Jun Chen

Dr. Jun Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 October 2016 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
SJSheng-Li Jiang
Sheng-Li Jiang
YYYi Yu
Yi Yu
YLYao Long
Yao Long
HZHan-Yue Zhao
Han-Yue Zhao
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen

6 April 2017 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZHZheng-Hua He
Zheng-Hua He
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
QWQiang Wu
Qiang Wu

16 March 2018 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CJChao Jiang
Chao Jiang
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
CSChengguo Sun
Chengguo Sun
CZChong Zhang
Chong Zhang
CYChen Yang
Chen Yang
BHBing-Cheng Hu
Bing-Cheng Hu
Huang and Xu argue that the cyclo -N 5 – ion in (N 5 ) 6 (H 3 O) 3 (NH 4 ) 4 Cl we described in our report is theoretically unfavorable and is instead protonated. Their conclusion is invalid, as they use an improper method to assess the proton transfer in a solid crystal structure. We present an in-depth experimental and theoretical analysis of (N 5 ) 6 (H 3 O) 3 (NH 4 ) 4 Cl that supports the results in the original paper.

2 September 2016 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
JWJi-Zhou Wu
Ji-Zhou Wu
SJSheng-Li Jiang
Sheng-Li Jiang
YYYi Yu
Yi Yu
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
Using a novel cocrystal explosive, 1 : 1 NTO : TZTN, as an example, we have gained insight into the interaction-structure–property interrelationship.

27 April 2015 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYao Long
Yao Long
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen

28 January 2018 in Journal of Applied Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XZXueyang Zhang
Xueyang Zhang
KWKun Wang
Kun Wang
WZWenjun Zhu
Wenjun Zhu
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
MCMengqiu Cai
Mengqiu Cai
Wangyu HuWangyu Hu
Wangyu Hu
Non-equilibrium molecular-dynamic simulations with a modified analytic embedded-atom model potential have been performed to investigate the effect of three kinds of grain boundaries (GBs) on the martensitic transformation in iron bicrystals with three different GBs under shock loadings. Our results show that the phase transition was influenced by the GBs. All three GBs provide a nucleation site for the α → ε transformation in samples shock-loaded with up = 0.5 km/s, and in particular, the elastic wave can induce the phase transformation at Σ3 ⟨110⟩ twist GB, which indicates that the phase transformation can occur at Σ3 ⟨110⟩ twist GB with a much lower pressure. The effect of GBs on the stress assisted transformation (SAT) mechanisms is discussed. All variants nucleating at the vicinity of these GBs meet the maximum strain work (MSW) criterion. Moreover, all of the variants with the MSW nucleate at Σ5 ⟨001⟩ twist GB and Σ3 ⟨110⟩ tilt GB, but only part of them nucleate at Σ3 ⟨110⟩ twist GB. This is because the coincident planes between both sides of the GB would affect the slip process, which is the second stage of the martensitic transformation and influences the selection of variant. We also find that the martensitic transformation at the front end of the bicrystals would give rise to stress attenuation in samples shock-loaded with up = 0.6 km/s, which makes the GBs seem to be unfavorable to the martensitic transformation. Our findings have the potential to affect the interface engineering and material design under high pressure conditions.