Leslie Denise Williams

Dr. Leslie Denise Williams

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

20 April 2020 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TVTetyana I. Vasylyeva
Tetyana I. Vasylyeva
AZAlexander Zarebski
Alexander Zarebski
PSPavlo Smyrnov
Pavlo Smyrnov
Leslie Denise WilliamsLeslie Denise Williams
Leslie Denise Williams
AKAnia Korobchuk
Ania Korobchuk
Samuel R. FriedmanSamuel R. Friedman
Samuel R. Friedman
Assessment of the long-term population-level effects of HIV interventions is an ongoing public health challenge. Following the implementation of a Transmission Reduction Intervention Project (TRIP) in Odessa, Ukraine, in 2013–2016, we obtained HIV pol gene sequences and used phylogenetics to identify HIV transmission clusters. We further applied the birth-death skyline model to the sequences from Odessa (n = 275) and Kyiv (n = 92) in order to estimate changes in the epidemic’s effective reproductive number (Re) and rate of becoming uninfectious (δ). We identified 12 transmission clusters in Odessa; phylogenetic clustering was correlated with younger age and higher average viral load at the time of sampling. Estimated Re were similar in Odessa and Kyiv before the initiation of TRIP; Re started to decline in 2013 and is now below Re = 1 in Odessa (Re = 0.4, 95%HPD 0.06–0.75), but not in Kyiv (Re = 2.3, 95%HPD 0.2–5.4). Similarly, estimates of δ increased in Odessa after the initiation of TRIP. Given that both cities shared the same HIV prevention programs in 2013–2019, apart from TRIP, the observed changes in transmission parameters are likely attributable to the TRIP intervention. We propose that molecular epidemiology analysis can be used as a post-intervention effectiveness assessment tool.

3 April 2020 in Annals of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Leslie Denise WilliamsLeslie Denise Williams
Leslie Denise Williams
UIUmedjon Ibragimov
Umedjon Ibragimov
BTBarbara Tempalski
Barbara Tempalski
RSRonald Stall
Ronald Stall
AJAnna Satcher Johnson
Anna Satcher Johnson
SFSamuel R. Friedman
Samuel R. Friedman

17 February 2021 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Leslie Denise WilliamsLeslie Denise Williams
Leslie Denise Williams
MMMary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
Carl LatkinCarl Latkin
Carl Latkin
BBBasmattee Boodram
Basmattee Boodram

18 September 2020 in Annals of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Leslie Denise WilliamsLeslie Denise Williams
Leslie Denise Williams
RSRonald Stall
Ronald Stall
BTBarbara Tempalski
Barbara Tempalski
KJKevin Jefferson
Kevin Jefferson
JSJustin Smith
Justin Smith
SFSamuel R. Friedman
Samuel R. Friedman

Leslie Denise WilliamsLeslie Denise Williams
Leslie Denise Williams
ELEunhye Lee
Eunhye Lee
Carl LatkinCarl Latkin
Carl Latkin
MMMary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
MKMaggie Kaufmann
Maggie Kaufmann
BBBasmattee Boodram
Basmattee Boodram
People who inject drugs (PWID) are a population that disproportionately struggles with economic and mental health challenges. However, despite numerous reports of people globally experiencing new or exacerbated economic and/or mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, the literature on the effect of the pandemic on PWID and their risk for harm (e.g., overdose) remains sparse. The present study will describe reported changes during the pandemic in risk factors for drug overdose (including changes in mental health symptoms and care access) among PWID in Chicago, and it will examine associations between such risk factor changes and the experience of economic challenges during the pandemic. Participants from an ongoing longitudinal study of young PWID from the Chicago suburbs and their injection risk network members (N = 138; mean age = 28.7 years) were interviewed about changes in their experiences, substance use behavior, and mental health since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Bivariate cross tabulations were computed of each “overdose risk factor” with experiences of economic challenges during the pandemic. Fisher’s Exact Tests were used to assess statistical significance. Adjusted logistic regression models were also conducted that controlled for sociodemographic characteristics, for time elapsed since the start of the pandemic, and for pre-pandemic income, homelessness, and injection frequency. Over half of our sample reported using alone more than usual during the pandemic, and over 40% reported using more than usual and/or buying drugs that were of a decreased purity or quality. Additionally, a large proportion of our sample (52.5% of those asked) reported more difficulty than usual accessing mental health care. Experiencing loss of a source of income during the pandemic was associated with using more drugs, using alone more, using a larger amount of drugs while using alone, wanting to stop using but being unable, and difficulty accessing mental health care. The preliminary associations found by the present study suggest that economic challenges or disruptions experienced during the pandemic are likely to increase risk for overdose among PWID experiencing such challenges, via changes in the above behaviors and/or conditions that are associated with risk for overdose. Intervention efforts should therefore be focused not only directly on overdose prevention, but also on assisting PWID with their economic challenges and helping them regain economic stability and access to services that may have been impeded by financial difficulty.