Krzysztof Jeziorski

Dr. Krzysztof Jeziorski

1. Department of Gerontology, Public Health and Didactics, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Spartanska 1, 02-637 Warszawa, Poland
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 February 2016 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJ. Randolph Hecht
J. Randolph Hecht
YBYung-Jue Bang
Yung-Jue Bang
SQShukui K. Qin
Shukui K. Qin
HCHyun Cheol Chung
Hyun Cheol Chung
JXJianming M. Xu
Jianming M. Xu
DSDennis Slamon
Dennis Slamon
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of adding lapatinib to capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in patients with previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –amplified advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Patients with HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to CapeOx plus lapatinib 1,250 mg or placebo daily. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2 amplification in the primary efficacy population. Results: A total of 545 patients were randomly assigned, and 487 patients comprised the primary efficacy population. Median OS in the lapatinib and placebo arms was 12.2 (95% CI, 10.6 to 14.2) and 10.5 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 11.3), respectively, which was not significantly different (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.12). Median progression-free survival in the lapatinib and placebo arms was 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 7.0) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 5.7), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.00; P = .0381). Response rate was significantly higher in the lapatinib arm: 53% (95% CI, 46.4 to 58.8) compared with 39% (95% CI, 32.9 to 45.3) in the placebo arm (P = .0031). Preplanned exploratory subgroup analyses showed OS in the lapatinib arm was prolonged in Asian and younger patients. No correlation was observed between HER2 immunohistochemistry status and survival. There were increased toxicities in the lapatinib arm, particularly diarrhea. Conclusion: Addition of lapatinib to CapeOx did not increase OS in patients with HER2-amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. There were clear differences in the effect of lapatinib depending on region and age. Future studies could examine this correlation.

20 July 2007 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRobert G. Gish
Robert G. Gish
CPCamillo Porta
Camillo Porta
LLLucian Lazar
Lucian Lazar
PRPaul Ruff
Paul Ruff
RFRonald Feld
Ronald Feld
GKGerard T. Kennealey
Gerard T. Kennealey
Purpose: The study objective was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with nolatrexed (NOL) or doxorubicin (DOX). Patients and Methods: Patients from North America, Europe, and South Africa (N = 445) with HCC were randomly assigned to receive NOL or DOX. Eligible patients had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60%, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score ≤ 3, and adequate organ function. Primary end point was OS. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates, and safety. The treatment groups were well-balanced with regards to age, sex, ethnic origin, and underlying liver disease. Randomization was stratified according to KPS and CLIP score. Results: At the time of the final analysis, 377 patients had died. Median OS was 22.3 weeks for NOL and 32.3 weeks for DOX (P = .0068). The hazard ratio was 0.753 in favor of DOX. Objective response rate (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) was 1.4% for NOL and 4.0% for DOX. Median PFS was 12 weeks for NOL and 10 weeks for DOX (P = .7091). Median time to treatment failure was 8.4 weeks for NOL and 9.1 weeks for DOX (P = .0969). Grade 3 and 4 stomatitis, vomiting, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia were more common in the NOL arm. Alopecia was more common in the DOX arm. More patients were withdrawn from study for toxicity in the NOL arm than in the DOX arm. Conclusion: NOL showed minimal activity in this phase III trial. Further exploration at this dose and schedule in HCC is not warranted.

15 October 2009 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JĆJarosław Ćwikła
Jarosław Ćwikła
ASA. Sankowski
A. Sankowski
NSN. Seklecka
N. Seklecka
JBJ. R. Buscombe
J. R. Buscombe
ANA. Nasierowska-Guttmejer
A. Nasierowska-Guttmejer
JWJ. Walecki
J. Walecki
Background: To evaluate the clinical and radiological effectiveness of [DOTA0, D-Phe1, Tyr3]-octreotate (DOTATATE) Y-90 in patients with extensive progressive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NETs). Materials and methods: Sixty patients with histologically proven GEP-NETs were treated with DOTATATE Y-90. Clinical responses were assessed 6 weeks after completing therapy and then after each of the 3- to 6-month intervals. The radiological response was classified according to RECIST criteria. Results: At 6 months after final treatment, radiological partial response (PR; at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) was observed in 13 patients (23%), and the remaining patients had stable disease (SD; less than 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or less than 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) (77%). Clinical PR at 6 months was in 43 patients (72%), nine patients had SD and progressive disease (PD) was noted in eight patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months, while the median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. In eight patients with early PD, the PFS was 4.5 and OS 9.5 months, while in those with SD or PR, PFS and OS were 19.5 and 23.5 months, respectively. After 12 months of follow-up, five patients had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 or 3 renal toxicity. Haematological toxicity (WHO grade 3 and 4) was noted during therapy in 10% of patients and persisted in 5%. Conclusions: DOTATATE Y-90 therapy is effective and relatively safe in patients with GEP-NET. Standard doses of DOTATATE Y-90 result in a relatively low risk of myelotoxicity. However, due to ongoing risk of renal toxicity, careful monitoring of the kidney is recommended.

1 February 2005 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDM Ducreux
M Ducreux
ECE Van Cutsem
E Van Cutsem
JLJ L Van Laethem
J L Van Laethem
TGThomas M Gress
Thomas M Gress
KJKrzysztof Jeziorski
Krzysztof Jeziorski
EGEORTC Gastro Intestinal Tract Cancer Group
EORTC Gastro Intestinal Tract Cancer Group

15 January 2013 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OGon behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group
on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group
GYG Yadegarfar
G Yadegarfar
LFL Friend
L Friend
LJL Jones
L Jones
LPL M Plum
L M Plum
JRJ K Ramage
J K Ramage
Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:

20 June 2007 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLManfred Paul Lutz
Manfred Paul Lutz
HWHansjochen Wilke
Hansjochen Wilke
DWD.J. Theo Wagener
D.J. Theo Wagener
UVUdo Vanhoefer
Udo Vanhoefer
KJKrzysztof Jeziorski
Krzysztof Jeziorski
ECEric Van Cutsem
Eric Van Cutsem
Purpose: This multicentric, randomized, two-stage phase II trial evaluated three simplified weekly infusional regimens of fluorouracil (FU) or FU plus folinic acid (FA) and cisplatin (Cis) with the aim to select a regimen for future phase III trials. Patients and Methods: A total of 145 patients with advanced gastric cancer where randomly assigned to weekly FU 3,000 mg/m2/24 hours (HD-FU), FU 2,600 mg/m2/24 hours plus dl-FA 500 mg/m2 or l-FA 250 mg/m2 (HD-FU/FA), or FU 2000 mg/m2/24 hours plus FA plus biweekly Cis 50 mg/m2, each administered for 6 weeks with a 1-week rest. The primary end point was the response rate. Results: Confirmed responses were observed in 6.1% (two of 33) of the eligible patients treated with HD-FU, in 25% (12 of 48, including one complete remission [CR]) with HD-FU/FA, and in 45.7% (21 of 46, including four CRs) with HD-FU/FA/Cis. The HD-FU arm was closed after stage 1 because the required minimum number of responses was not met. The median progression-free survival of all patients in the HD-FU, HD-FU/FA, and HD-FU/FA/Cis arm was 1.9, 4.0, and 6.1 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 7.1, 8.9, and 9.7 months, and the survival rate at 1 year was 24.3%, 30.3%, and 45.3%, respectively. Grade 4 toxicities were rare. The most relevant grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia in 1.9%, 5.4%, and 19.6%, and diarrhea in 2.7%, 1.9%, and 3.9% of the cycles in the HD-FU, HD-FU/FA, and HD-/FU/Cis arms, respectively. Conclusion: Weekly infusional FU/FA plus biweekly Cis is effective and safe in patients with gastric cancer.