Excessive iron intake is detrimental to human health, especially to the liver, which is the main organ for iron storage. Excessive iron intake can lead to liver injury. The gut-liver axis (GLA) refers to the bidirectional relationship between the gut and its microbiota and the liver, which is a combination of signals generated by dietary, genetic and environmental factors. Excessive iron intake disrupts the GLA at multiple interconnected levels, including the gut microbiota, gut barrier function, and the liver's innate immune system. Excessive iron intake induces gut microbiota dysbiosis, destroys gut barriers, promotes liver exposure to gut microbiota and its derived metabolites, and increases the pro-inflammatory environment of the liver. There is increasing evidence that excess iron intake alters the levels of gut microbiota-derived metabolites such as secondary bile acids (BAs), short-chain fatty acids, indoles, and trimethylamine N-oxide, which play an important role in maintaining homeostasis of the GLA. In addition to iron chelators, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory agents currently used in iron overload therapy, gut barrier intervention may be a potential target for iron overload therapy. In this paper, we review the relationship between excess iron intake and chronic liver diseases, the regulation of iron homeostasis by the GLA, and focus on the effects of excess iron intake on the GLA. It has been suggested that probiotics, fecal microbiota transfer, farnesoid X receptor agonists, and microRNA may be potential therapeutic targets for iron overload-induced liver injury by protecting gut barrier function.

Objective: Resistance to anticancer agents ensures a poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer. Metformin could enhance the anticancer effects of standard antineoplastic agents [traditional chemotherapy drugs, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)]; however, it is unclear whether metformin can be combined with antineoplastic agents in the treatment of lung cancer. To explore the efficacy of combinational strategies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for diabetic and non-diabetic patients with lung cancer.Method: An electronic literature search was performed to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes were extracted. Subgroup analysis by antineoplastic agents, study type, histology and clinical stage were investigated.Results: 14 studies (three RCTs and eleven observational cohort studies) consisting 3,856 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to standard antineoplastic agents alone (traditional chemotherapy drugs, EGFR-TKIs or ICIs), the antineoplastic agents combined with metformin significantly improved OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.81, p < 0.00001) and PFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59–0.88, p = 0.001); a similar association was found in observational evidence. Limited data from RCTs showed no differences in OS or PFS.Conclusion: Metformin plus antineoplastic agents may improve survival outcomes of patients with lung cancer. Further investigation is needed.