David Kirmayer

Dr. David Kirmayer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2006 in Journal of Controlled Release
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LKLeonid Kagan
Leonid Kagan
NLNoa Lapidot
Noa Lapidot
MAMichel Afargan
Michel Afargan
DKDavid Kirmayer
David Kirmayer
EMEytan Moor
Eytan Moor
AHAmnon Hoffman
Amnon Hoffman

1 January 2018 in European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
J(Julia Gefter (Shenderovich)
Julia Gefter (Shenderovich)
BZBatya Zaks
Batya Zaks
DKDavid Kirmayer
David Kirmayer
ELEran Lavy
Eran Lavy
DSDoron Steinberg
Doron Steinberg
MFMichael Friedman
Michael Friedman

1 May 2015 in International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJulia Shenderovich
Julia Shenderovich
MFMark Feldman
Mark Feldman
DKDavid Kirmayer
David Kirmayer
AAAbed Al-Quntar
Abed Al-Quntar
DSDoron Steinberg
Doron Steinberg
MFMichael Friedman
Michael Friedman

20 August 2019 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBernhard Funk
Bernhard Funk
DKDavid Kirmayer
David Kirmayer
SSSharonit Sahar-Helft
Sharonit Sahar-Helft
IGIrith Gati
Irith Gati
MFMichael Friedman
Michael Friedman
DSDoron Steinberg
Doron Steinberg
Enterococcus faecalis is a bacterium frequently isolated after failed root canal therapy. This study analyzed the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects in vitro of sustained-release fillers (SRF) containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) against vancomycin resistant E. faecalis. First, the solidification capability was tested by introducing liquid SRF into phosphate buffered saline, followed by 30 s of vortexing. The antimicrobial effects of SRF-CPC against static monospecies biofilms were analyzed with a metabolic assay. Inhibition of biofilm formation was tested by exposing daily refreshed E. faecalis suspensions to SRF-CPC for 9 weeks. To evaluate the effects of SRF-CPC against preformed biofilms, biofilms were grown for 1, 3 and 7 days, and then treated with SRF-CPC for 24 h. Biofilm kill time was tested by applying SRF-CPC to a 3-day-old biofilm and measuring its viability at different time points. All experiments were compared to Placebo SRFs and to untreated control biofilms. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05. The liquid SRF solidified within seconds and no structural changes were observed after 30 s of vortexing at maximum speed. SRF-CPC inhibited E. faecalis biofilm formation for 7 weeks and significantly reduced its viability in weeks 8 and 9. Mature biofilms grown for 1, 3 and 7 days were destructed by SRF-CPC in less than 24 h. Fifty percent of a 3-day-old biofilm was destructed in 2 h and complete destruction occurred in less than 12 h. (P < 0.05 in all cases, compared to SRII-Placebo). SRF-CPC’s physical properties and long-lasting anti-biofilm effects make it a promising coadjuvant medication for endodontic therapy.

1 March 2018 in Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANili Avni-Magen
Nili Avni-Magen
DEDavid Eshar
David Eshar
MFMichael Friedman
Michael Friedman
DKDavid Kirmayer
David Kirmayer
LLLital Letschert
Lital Letschert
ELEran Lavy
Eran Lavy
Myiasis is a major disease condition in human and veterinary medicine. Domestic, free-ranging, and zoo-housed animals can be severely affected by myiasis. Depending on case severity, multiple treatment episodes may be indicated and can lead to recurrent capturing, handling stress, and anesthetics, all of which increase the risk of adverse responses (including death) individually and also in the herd. As an insecticide, ivermectin is often used for larval control. A total of 28 individual myiasis cases were retrospectively evaluated, out of which 11 cases were also treated using an ivermectin sustained-release varnish (SRV). The clinical outcome of all cases was assessed and the results suggest that the use of a topical ivermectin SRV (with or without concurrent injectable ivermectin) can reduce handling and treatments, has no adverse effects, and has minimal recurrence of the disease when compared with cases treated without it.

11 March 2015 in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZNZakhar Nudelman
Zakhar Nudelman
MFMordechai Findler
Mordechai Findler
DBDinorah Barasch
Dinorah Barasch
ANAlina Nemirovski
Alina Nemirovski
APAnna Pikovsky
Anna Pikovsky
RCRakefet Czerninski
Rakefet Czerninski