Aim: This research aims to determine whether the time of injury (congenital or acquired) affects the quality of life (QOL) in families having a child or adolescent with neurological impairment. Design: Comparative, cross-sectional study. Material and methods: To find out if there are differences in the quality of life domains between these two groups, 66 subjects (31 mothers of patients with congenital disorders and 35 mothers of patients with acquired disorders) completed the PedsQL-Family Impact Module (PedsQL-FIM), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument—Short Form (WHOQOL-BRIEF), and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Results: Analyzing the PedsQL-FIM dimensions, we found significant differences between groups in terms of emotional functioning, communication, and worry, which favor the congenital group. There are no statistically significant differences between social functioning, cognitive functioning, and daily activities groups. No significant differences between groups when evaluating the WHOQOL-BRIEF’s domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, environment) have been found. According to CERQ results, adaptive strategies had higher mean scores in the congenital than in the acquired group. The mean score for maladaptive strategies in the congenital group is higher than that in the acquired one, except for catastrophizing, which is higher for acquired. Conclusion: Our findings show that the mothers of patients with acquired neuropathology have a lower quality of life in the emotional functioning, communication, and worry domains.

Background: University students often experience significant stress, which may contribute to disordered eating behaviors. Objectives: This study examines the relationship between perceived stress and eating attitudes among physical therapy students in Romania, exploring the impact on overall well-being and identifying predictors of maladaptive eating patterns. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 192 students from the Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Two validated instruments were used: the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) to assess eating behaviors and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) to measure stress levels. Statistical analyses included correlations, ANOVA, and regression models, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Results: Among respondents, 15.1% displayed disordered eating behaviors, with stress significantly correlating with EAT-26 subscales. Stress levels were predominantly moderate to high, with younger students reporting higher perceived stress. A significant positive correlation was found between perceived stress and disordered eating behaviors, particularly dieting and bulimia/food preoccupation. Female students reported higher stress levels than males; however, no significant gender differences were observed in disordered eating patterns. No significant associations were found between BMI, weight fluctuations, and EAT-26 scores, suggesting other factors may better explain disordered eating behaviors. Logistic regression identified perceived stress as a significant predictor of disordered eating risk, reinforcing its role in shaping maladaptive eating patterns. Conclusions: Stress significantly impacts eating attitudes, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to reduce stress and promote healthy coping mechanisms. Future research should investigate longitudinal patterns and the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving student well-being. The limited sample size and the absence of sensitivity analyses are notable limitations that constrain the generalizability of the findings.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between emotional intelligence and coping strategies used by adolescents with disabilities, on the one hand to understand how emotional skills influence stress management and everyday challenges and, on the other hand, considering that it could help specialists to develop interventions and educational programs that support the improvement of emotional skills and coping strategies among adolescents with disabilities. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 100 Romanian adolescents with neuromotor disabilities aged 13 to 18 years (M = 15.2) divided into three groups according to the stages of adolescence: Group 1 (13 years—46 respondents), Group 2 (14 to 17 years—26 respondents), and Group 3 (18 years—28 respondents). They completed a questionnaire that assessed the emotional intelligence of the adolescents (positive impression, interpersonal, intrapersonal, stress management, adaptability, and general mood) as well as another one that assessed the possible cognitive emotional coping strategies (e.g., “blame self”, “acceptance”, “rumination”, “positive refocusing”, “refocus on planning”, “positive reappraisal”, “putting into perspective”, “catastrophizing”, and “blaming others”) that they may adopt in managing life situations related to their health problem. Results: Group 3 has significantly higher scores than Group 2 on the Interpersonal subscale and also significantly higher scores than Group 1 on the Stress management. Our analysis also revealed significant correlations between adaptive coping strategies and emotional intelligence domains across all groups, with positive associations between acceptance and stress management, as well as between positive refocusing and adaptability. Regression analysis identified adaptive coping strategies as significant predictors of emotional intelligence, explaining 29% of its variance. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the critical importance of targeted interventions to enhance emotional regulation and adaptive coping strategies in adolescents with neuromotor disabilities. By focusing on strengthening emotional intelligence and tailoring interventions to developmental stages, these programs can promote better emotional and social functioning, particularly in challenging situations.

Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) is used in the rehabilitation of patients with shoulder periarthritis (SP) to promote tendon regeneration. This quasi-experimental non-randomized comparative study included 36 cases of SP, divided into two groups, and aimed to comparatively investigate the analgesic and functional effects of two different rESWT protocols. In Group One, the protocol involved an energy level of 210 J/session, a frequency of 10 Hz, and 2500 impulses per session. In Group Two, the protocol used an energy level of 190 J/session, a frequency of 10–15 Hz, and 2000 impulses per session. Treatments were administered over three sessions in Group One and five sessions in Group Two, with one-week intervals between sessions. Both rESWT protocols were combined with a physical therapy program consisting of ten daily sessions of analgesic physiotherapy and kinesiotherapy. Before and after the rehabilitation program, patients were assessed for pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS) and shoulder function using range of motion (ROM) measurements (via goniometry) and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Significantly better outcomes were observed in Group One (p < 0.001), particularly in terms of pain reduction and improvements in shoulder functionality, especially external rotation. These results support the effectiveness of the rESWT protocol used in Group One, which combined lower energy and frequency levels with a higher number of impulses over fewer sessions.

Introduction: Considering the extensive development of artificial intelligence (AI) facilities, like Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 4.o and ChatGPT Scholar, we explored their abilities to conduct a systematic literature review. Using as a specific domain, an attempt to frame/methodize clinical assessment instruments used to evaluate neuro-functional deficits in Parkinson’s disease (PD) – including framed through the ICF(-DH) paradigm – for the above-mentioned comparison between human intelligence (HI) and AI, this paper is as well, a follow-up regarding the most actual subject matter of the AI’s capabilities evolution in this respect. As well-known clinical-/paraclinical-/functional evaluations, using assessment quantitative (as much as possible) instruments, are basic endeavors for rehabilitation, as they enable setting of appropriate and realistic therapeutic-rehabilitative specific goals.Methods: Within the actual work, we have first achieved a narrative synthesis of the main molecular mechanisms involved in PD pathophysiology, underpinning its clinical appearance and evolution. To fundament our knowledge on an up-to-date information regarding the clinical-functional evaluation tools practiced in PD, we systematically reviewed the literature in this domain, published in the last 6 years, through a PRISMA type method for filtering/selecting the related bibliographic resources. The same keywords combinations/syntaxes have been used contextually, also to dialogize with ChatGPT4.o and ChatGPT.Results: Scholar Applying PRISMA type methodology (HI achieved), we have selected, matching the filtering criteria, 24 articles. Interrogating the two AI above-mentioned models, we obtained quite difficult to be availed/useful – comparative to our HI obtained – outcomes. Thus, when interrogating ChatGPT4.o, ChatGPT Scholar repeatedly, they provided - partially diverse - inappropriate related answers, including ones pending on the interrogator’s IP, although they claimed to have this capacity.Discussion: We consider, regarding their capabilities to achieve systematic literature reviews, that neither ChatGPT 4.o nor ChatGPT Scholar still cannot succeed this (yet, they keep improving lately). Additionally, we have consistently extended, including within a narrative related literature review, our ‘dialogue” with these two AI facilities regarding their availability to enhance the related evaluation instruments accuracy on neurofunctional assessments within biomarker-based frameworks. So, our research aimed basically to emphasize the main topical data regarding these two important paradigms of knowledge (based on HI and on AI) acquirements – considering the impetuous development of the latter – and thus, possibly to contribute inclusively at improving the actual performances to achieve Systematic Literature Reviews through the PRISMA type method – for the moment still better served by HI.

Background: The present study focuses on the development and validation of the Self-Perceived Anhedonia Scale for Adults (SPAS-A), a novel instrument designed to assess pleasure deficits across multiple dimensions of anhedonia, including social, physical, cognitive, and emotional facets. The study aimed to establish the psychometric properties of the scale, including its reliability and validity. Materials and methods: All the data were collected from a sample of 600 participants between February 2024 and November 2024 via Google Forms. Results: Factorial analysis, including Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 72.4% of the total variance, which demonstrated a coherent and multidimensional representation of anhedonia. The reliability of the scale was further supported by high Cronbach’s Alpha values for each subscale, with social anhedonia showing an exceptional value of 0.916, followed by emotional (0.905), cognitive (0.900), and physical (0.873) anhedonia. Conclusions: These findings indicate that SPAS-A is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pleasure deficits in adults, providing a comprehensive measure of anhedonia that can be utilized in both clinical and research settings. Future studies could benefit from longitudinal designs and more diverse samples to better understand the temporal and cultural variability of anhedonia.