Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS), the official journal of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation, is an international, peer-reviewed, immediate open access journal. All published articles in JDRS has been free for everyone, without embargo, since 1990.

Objectives: There is no consensus on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and autologous conditioned serum (ACS) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Also, the group of patients who will benefit most from this treatment is not clear. This study aims to understand the effects of two treatment modalities: ACS and PRP on pain and clinical scores in the treatment of OA. For this reason, we compared the long-term (five-year follow up) clinical results of the patients to whom these two treatment methods were applied. Materials and methods: Eighty-two knee osteoarthritis cases, selected from a database prospectively maintained in our tertiary university hospital after institutional ethics committee approval, examined between January 2013 and September 2020 and treated with ACS and PRP by the same orthobiological treatment team, were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical results of group A (n=40) treated with ACS and group B (n=42) treated with PRP were statistically analyzed. Clinical evaluations were made pre-injection and at one, six, 12, 24 and 60 months post-treatment, using the knee injury and osteoarthritis result score (KOOS) for the evaluation of function and a visual analog scale (VAS) for the evaluation of pain. Results: Side effects were noted in two patients (5%) in group A and 16 patients (38.1%) in group B. More side effects were seen in group B compared to group A (p<0.001). The better VAS scores in both groups were detected in the sixth and 12th months. When VAS scores were examined, better results were obtained in group A in the 12th and 24th months (p<0.05). When KOOS scores were examined, the superiority of ACS to PRP at 12 and 24 months was shown in KOOS.S, KOOS.P and KOOS.ADL scores (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of all scores and baseline scores at 60 months. Conclusion: The effectiveness of ACS and PRP treatments can last up to two years. After two years, the effectiveness of both treatments decreases. Comparing the two treatments, ACS treatment showed better results on VAS and KOOS scores compared to PRP treatment.

Background: Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a spectrum of aggressive soft tissue fibroblastic neoplasms characterized by variable myxoid stroma, pleomorphism, and a distinctive curved vascular pattern; these tumors are associated with a high likelihood of recurrence. Better local tumor control (a tumor-free margin) is believed to be important to minimize the risk of recurrence, but the effect of surgical resection margin status on local recurrence and survival in MFS is not as well-characterized as it might be. Questions/purposes: (1) Is margin width associated with local recurrence? (2) Is there a relationship between greater margin thickness and improved overall and disease-free survival (DFS)? (3) Is worsening French Federation of Cancer Centers grade associated with local recurrence and poorer overall survival? Methods: Using a database of patients with bone and soft tissue tumors at a tertiary university hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 282 patients who had soft tissue sarcomas and who had been surgically treated by a multidisciplinary bone and soft tissue tumor care team between January 2010 and December 2021. Of these 282 patients, 38 were identified as having MFS. Patients who received surgical care for MFS outside our institution (unplanned resection) (four patients) and whose surgical margins were not reported as microscopic numerical data (10) were excluded from the analysis. We estimated survival and local recurrence and examined factors potentially influencing these outcomes. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical margin distance (in mm), and disease-related outcomes were recorded. The minimum follow-up was 3 months (median 41.5 months, range 3 to 128 months). Results: Overall 1-year local recurrence-free rates were 66.7% (95% CI 50% to 88%). Patients with positive margins were more likely to have local recurrence than patients with negative margins (HR 10.91 [95% CI 2.61 to 45.66]; p = 0.001). Patients with an inadequate margin (positive margin or a negative margin of 1 mm or less) had a greater risk of local recurrence (HR 9.96 [95% CI 1.22 to 81.44]; p = 0.032). Patients with positive margins or margins less than or equal to 1 mm had worse 2-year local recurrence-free survival than did those with margins of greater than 1 mm (46.9% [95% CI 16% to 76%] versus 91.7% [95% CI 75% to 100%]; p = 0.005). The mean overall survival was 98 months (95% CI 77.2 to 118.8). The Kaplan-Meier overall 1-, 2- and 5-year estimated rates of survival were 88% (95% CI 75% to 100%), 79.2% (95% CI 64.5% to 97.2%), and 73.5% (95% CI 57.2 % to 94.5%), respectively. Positive surgical margins were associated with decreased overall survival (HR 6.96 [95% CI 1.39 to 34.89]; p = 0.018). There was a mean DFS time of 4.25 months (95% CI 0.92 to 7.59) in microscopically positive patients, 75.5 months (95% CI 37.47 to 113.53) in patients with margins 1 mm or less, and 118 months (95% CI 99.23 to 136.77) in patients with margins over 1 mm. There was a statistical difference between DFS times according to surgical margin classification (p < 0.001). With the numbers we had, we could not detect any difference between the histologic grades determined by the French Federation of Cancer Centers grading system in terms of local recurrence (HR 3.80 [95% CI 0.76 to 18.94]; p = 0.103) and overall survival (HR 6.91 [95% CI 0.79 to 60.13]; p = 0.080). Tumor size was the prognostic factor associated with a higher local recurrence rate among all factors analyzed as univariate (HR 1.18 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.32]; p = 0.004). Conclusion: A surgical procedure with a sufficient negative surgical margin distance appears to be associated with a lower proportion of patients who experience a local recurrence and is associated with overall patient survival. It is difficult to define what a sufficient margin is, but in our patients, it appears to be greater than 1 mm. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS), the official journal of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation, is an international, peer-reviewed, immediate open access journal. All published articles in JDRS has been free for everyone, without embargo, since 1990.

Background and Objectives: The primary objective of surgeons treating bone and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is to achieve optimal local tumor control, ensuring a tumor-free margin and preventing local recurrence. However, the impact of surgical resection margin status on extremity STSs remains an area that requires further exploration. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of surgical resection margin status on both local recurrence and overall survival rates. Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty-five patients who underwent surgical resection with a diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma were studied. The study recorded patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical margin distance (in millimeters), and disease-related outcomes. Results: The minimum follow-up period was 24 months (24–168). The mean time to local recurrence after resection was 103.2 months (95% CI 91.73 to 114.64). The mean local recurrence-free survival was found to be 7.23 months in patients with positive surgical margins, 87.42 months in patients with ≤1 mm, and 139.80 months in patients with >1 mm (p < 0.001). Patients with surgical margins ≤1 mm were more likely to have local recurrence than patients with >1 mm (0.41 [0.21–0.81], p = 0.010). The mean overall survival was 106.72 months (95% CI 95.98 to 117.46). Positive surgical margins were associated with decreased overall survival (3.58 [1.46–8.80], p = 0.005). There was a statistically significant difference between the histologic grade in terms of local recurrence (4.50 [95% CI 2.57 to 7.88]; p < 0.001) and overall survival (3.12 [95% CI 1.52 to 6.41]; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Achieving a negative surgical margin distance of more than 1 mm appears to be correlated with a reduced risk of local recurrence. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor that detrimentally impacts overall patient survival. However, determining the appropriate margin distance for all patients poses a significant challenge.