This study aims to predict IDH wt with TERTp-mut gliomas using multiparametric MRI sequences through a novel fusion model, while matching model classification metrics with patient risk stratification aids in crafting personalized diagnostic and prognosis evaluations.Preoperative T1CE and T2FLAIR sequences from 1185 glioma patients were analyzed. A MultiChannel_2.5D_DL model and a 2D DL model, both based on the cross-scale attention vision transformer (CrossFormer) neural network, along with a Radiomics model, were developed. These were integrated via ensemble learning into a stacking model. The MultiChannel_2.5D_DL model outperformed the 2D_DL and Radiomics models, with AUCs of 0.806-0.870. The stacking model achieved the highest AUC (0.855-0.904) across validation sets. Patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on stacking model scores, with significant survival differences observed via Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests. The stacking model effectively identifies IDH wt TERTp-mutant gliomas and stratifies patient risk, aiding personalized prognosis.

As the most common neuro-epithelial tumors of the central nervous system in adults, gliomas are highly malignant and easy to recurrence, with a dismal prognosis. Imaging studies are indispensable for tracking tumor progression (TP) or treatment-related changes (TRCs). During follow-up, distinguishing TRCs from TP in treated patients with gliomas remains challenging as both share similar clinical symptoms and morphological imaging characteristics (with new and/or increasing enhancing mass lesions) and fulfill criteria for progression. Thus, the early identification of TP and TRCs is of great significance for determining the prognosis and treatment. Histopathological biopsy is currently the gold standard for TP and TRC diagnosis. However, the invasive nature of this technique limits its clinical application. Advanced imaging methods (e.g., diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), amide proton transfer (APT) and artificial intelligence (AI)) provide a non-invasive and feasible technical means for identifying of TP and TRCs at an early stage, which have recently become research hotspots. This paper reviews the current research on using the abovementioned advanced imaging methods to identify TP and TRCs of gliomas. First, the review focuses on the pathological changes of the two entities to establish a theoretical basis for imaging identification. Then, it elaborates on the application of different imaging techniques and AI in identifying the two entities. Finally, the current challenges and future prospects of these techniques and methods are discussed.

Objective: High‐risk types of diffuse gliomas in adults include isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild‐type glioblastomas and grade 4 astrocytomas. Achieving noninvasive prediction of high‐risk molecular subtypes of gliomas is important for personalized and precise diagnosis and treatment.Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 116 patients diagnosed with adult diffuse gliomas. Multiple high‐risk molecular markers were tested, and various habitat models and whole‐tumor models were constructed based on preoperative routine and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) sequences to predict high‐risk molecular subtypes of gliomas. Feature selection and model construction utilized Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and support vector machine (SVM). Finally, the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was employed to explore the correlation between habitat quantitative features (intra‐tumor heterogeneity score，ITH score) and heterogeneity, as well as high‐risk molecular subtypes.Results: The results showed that the habitat analysis model based on DKI performed remarkably well (with AUC values reaching 0.977 and 0.902 in the training and test sets, respectively). The model's performance was further enhanced when combined with clinical variables. (The AUC values were 0.994 and 0.920, respectively.) Additionally, we found a close correlation between ITH score and heterogeneity, with statistically significant differences observed between high‐risk and non‐high‐risk molecular subtypes.Interpretation: The habitat model based on DKI is an ideal means for preoperatively predicting high‐risk molecular subtypes of gliomas, holding significant value for noninvasively alerting malignant gliomas and those with malignant transformation potential.

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved into a worldwide pandemic. Although CT is sensitive in detecting lesions and assessing their severity, these works mainly depend on radiologists’ subjective judgment, which is inefficient in case of a large-scale outbreak. This work focuses on developing a CT-based radiomics model to assess whether COVID-19 patients are in the early, progressive, severe, or absorption stages of the disease. We retrospectively analyzed the CT images of 284 COVID-19 patients. All of the patients were divided into four groups (0-3): early ( ), progressive ( ), severe ( ), and absorption ( ) groups, according to the progression of the disease and the CT features. Meanwhile, they were split randomly to training and test datasets with the fixed ratio of 7 : 3 in each category. Thirty-eight radiomic features were nominated from 1688 radiomic features after using select -best method and the ElasticNet algorithm. On this basis, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier was trained to build this model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the diagnostic performance of various models. The precision, recall, and -score of the classification model of macro- and microaverage were 0.82, 0.82, 0.81, 0.81, 0.81, and 0.81 for the training dataset and 0.75, 0.73, 0.73, 0.72, 0.72, and 0.72 for the test dataset. The AUCs for groups 0, 1, 2, and 3 on the training dataset were 0.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 0.93, and the microaverage AUC was 0.97 with a macroaverage AUC of 0.97. On the test dataset, AUCs for each group were 0.97, 0.86, 0.83, and 0.89 and the microaverage AUC was 0.89 with a macroaverage AUC of 0.90. The CT-based radiomics model proved efficacious in assessing the severity of COVID-19.

Purpose: To explore the role of bi-parametric MRI radiomics features in identifying PNI in high-grade PCa and to further develop a combined nomogram with clinical information. Methods: 183 high-grade PCa patients were included in this retrospective study. Tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were manually delineated on T2WI and DWI images. Radiomics features were extracted from lesion area segmented images obtained. Univariate logistic regression analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method were used for feature selection. A clinical model, a radiomics model, and a combined model were developed to predict PNI positive. Predictive performance was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curves. Results: The differential diagnostic efficiency of the clinical model had no statistical difference compared with the radiomics model (area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.766 and 0.823 in the train and test group, respectively). The radiomics model showed better discrimination in both the train cohort and test cohort (train AUC: 0.879 and test AUC: 0.908) than each subcategory image (T2WI train AUC: 0.813 and test AUC: 0.827; DWI train AUC: 0.749 and test AUC: 0.734). The discrimination efficiency improved when combining the radiomics and clinical models (train AUC: 0.906 and test AUC: 0.947). Conclusion: The model including radiomics signatures and clinical factors can accurately predict PNI positive in high-grade PCa patients.

Background: In lower-grade gliomas (LrGGs, histological grades 2–3), there exist a minority of high-risk molecular subtypes with malignant transformation potential, associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes and shorter survival prognosis. Identifying high-risk molecular subtypes early in LrGGs and conducting preoperative prognostic evaluations are crucial for precise clinical diagnosis and treatment. Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected data from 345 patients with LrGGs and comprehensively screened key high-risk molecular markers. Based on preoperative MRI sequences (CE-T1WI/T2-FLAIR), we employed seven classifiers to construct models based on habitat, radiomics, and combined. Eventually, we identified Extra Trees based on habitat features as the optimal predictive model for identifying high-risk molecular subtypes of LrGGs. Moreover, we developed a prognostic prediction model based on radiomics score (Radscore) to assess the survival outlook of patients with LrGGs. We utilized Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis alongside the log-rank test to discern variations in survival probabilities among high-risk and low-risk cohorts. The concordance index was employed to gauge the efficacy of habitat, clinical, and amalgamated prognosis models. Calibration curves were utilized to appraise the congruence between the anticipated survival probability and the actual survival probability projected by the models. Results: The habitat model for predicting high-risk molecular subtypes of LrGGs, achieved AUCs of 0.802, 0.771, and 0.768 in the training set, internal test set, and external test set, respectively. Comparison among habitat, clinical, combined prognostic models revealed that the combined prognostic model exhibited the highest performance (C-index = 0.781 in the training set, C-index = 0.778 in the internal test set, C-index = 0.743 in the external test set), followed by the habitat prognostic model (C-index = 0.749 in the training set, C-index = 0.716 in the internal test set, C-index = 0.707 in the external test set), while the clinical prognostic model performed the worst (C-index = 0.717 in the training set, C-index = 0.687 in the internal test set, C-index = 0.649 in the external test set). Furthermore, the calibration curves of the combined model exhibited satisfactory alignment when forecasting the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival probabilities of patients with LrGGs. Conclusion: The MRI-based habitat model simultaneously achieves the objectives of non-invasive prediction of high-risk molecular subtypes of LrGGs and assessment of survival prognosis. This has incremental value for early non-invasive warning of malignant transformation in LrGGs and risk-stratified management.