Coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) are a group of congenital conditions characterized by abnormal origin or course of any of the 3 main epicardial coronary arteries. Although CAAs have been identified as a common underlying condition in young athletes with sudden cardiac death, the widespread use of invasive and noninvasive coronary imaging has led to increased recognition of CAAs among adults. CAAS are often discovered as an incidental finding during the diagnostic workup for ischemic heart disease. The clinical correlates and prognostic implication of CAAs remain poorly understood in this context, and guideline-recommended therapeutic choices are supported by a low level of scientific evidence. Several studies have examined whether assessment of CAA-related myocardial ischemia can improve risk stratification in these patients, suggesting that multimodality imaging and functional tests may be key in the management of CAAs. The aim of this review is to outline definitions, classification, and epidemiology of the most relevant CAAs, highlighting recent advances and the potential impact of multimodality evaluation, and to discuss current therapeutic opportunities.

Aims: Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt-CA) affects older adults and is currently considered as a rare disorder. We investigated for the first time the prevalence of ATTRwt-CA in elderly individuals from the general population. Methods and results: General practitioners from Pisa, Italy, proposed a screening for ATTRwt-CA to all their patients aged 65–90 years, until 1000 accepted. The following red flags were searched: interventricular septal thickness ≥ 12 mm, any echocardiographic, electrocardiographic or clinical hallmark of CA, or high-sensitivity troponin T ≥ 14 ng/L. Individuals with at least one red flag (n = 346) were asked to undergo the search for a monoclonal protein and bone scintigraphy, and 216 accepted. Four patients received a non-invasive diagnosis of ATTRwt-CA. All complained of dyspnoea on moderate effort. A woman and a man aged 79 and 85 years, respectively, showed an intense cardiac tracer uptake (Grade 3), left ventricular (LV) wall thickening, Grade 2 and 3 diastolic dysfunction, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) > 1000 ng/L. Two other patients (a man aged 74 years and a woman aged 83 years) showed a Grade 2 uptake, an increased LV septal thickness, but preserved diastolic function, and NT-proBNP < 300 ng/L. The prevalence of ATTR-CA in subjects ≥ 65 years was calculated as 0.46% (i.e. 4 out of the 870 subjects completing the screening, namely 654 not meeting the criteria for Step 2 and 216 progressing to Step 2). Conclusion: Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis is uncommon in elderly subjects from the general population, but more frequent than expected for a rare disease.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is highly prevalent and is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. However, an evidence-based treatment is still absent. The heterogeneous definitions, differences in aetiology/pathophysiology, and diagnostic challenges of HFpEF made it difficult to define its epidemiological landmarks so far. Several large registries and observational studies have recently disclosed an increasing incidence/prevalence, as well as its prognostic significance. An accurate definition of HFpEF epidemiological boundaries and phenotypes is mandatory to develop novel effective and rational therapeutic approaches.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome resulting from the interaction between cardiac diseases, comorbidities and ageing. HFpEF is characterised by the activation of neurohormonal axes, namely of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, although to a lesser extent compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This provides a rationale for neurohormonal modulation as a therapeutic approach for HFpEF. Nonetheless, randomised clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a prognostic benefit from neurohormonal modulation therapies in HFpEF, with the sole exception of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction in the lower range of normality, for whom the American guidelines suggest that such therapies may be considered. In this review, the pathophysiological rationale for neurohormonal modulation in HFpEF is summarised and the clinical evidence on pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches backing current recommendations discussed.

Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the safest and most effective strategy for controlling the pandemic. However, some cases of acute cardiac events following vaccine administration have been reported, including myocarditis and myocardial infarction (MI). While post-vaccine myocarditis has been widely discussed, information about post-vaccine MI is scarce and heterogenous, often lacking in histopathological and pathophysiological details. We hereby present five cases (four men, mean age 64 years, range 50–76) of sudden death secondary to MI and tightly temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination. In each case, comprehensive macro- and microscopic pathological analyses were performed, including post-mortem cardiac magnetic resonance, to ascertain the cause of death. To investigate the pathophysiological determinants of MI, toxicological and tryptase analyses were performed, yielding negative results, while the absence of anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies ruled out vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Finally, genetic testing disclosed that all subjects were carriers of at least one pro-thrombotic mutation. Although the presented cases do not allow us to establish any causative relation, they should foster further research to investigate the possible link between COVID-19 vaccination, pro-thrombotic genotypes, and acute cardiovascular events.

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by autonomic nervous system (ANS) imbalance and low-grade chronic inflammation. The bidirectional relationship between the ANS and immune system (IS) is named ‘neuroimmune cross-talk’ (NICT) and is based on common signaling molecules, receptors, and pathways. NICT may be altered in HF, and neuroinflammation seems to be a main driver of HF progression. In HF, heightened sympathetic nerve activity triggers inflammatory cascades that lead to cardiomyocyte death and myocardial interstitial fibrosis. Concurrently, parasympathetic withdrawal may impair the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, with a less effective immune response to infections or inflammatory events. Additionally, microglial activation and inflammatory molecules contribute to autonomic imbalance by acting on central nuclei and peripheral visceral feedbacks, which in turn promote adverse cardiac remodeling, HF decompensation, and potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. Therefore, neuroinflammation has been identified as a potential target for treatment. Pharmacological antagonism of the neurohormonal system remains the cornerstone of chronic HF therapy. While some drugs used in HF management may have additional benefits due to their anti-inflammatory properties, clinical trials targeting inflammation in patients with HF have so far produced inconclusive results. Nevertheless, considering the pathophysiological relevance of NICT, its modulation seems an appealing strategy to optimize HF management. Current research is therefore investigating novel pharmacological targets for anti-inflammatory drugs, and the immunomodulatory properties of denervation approaches and bioelectronic medicine devices targeting NICT and neuroinflammation in HF. A deeper understanding of the complex relationship between the ANS and IS, as outlined in this review, could therefore facilitate the design of future studies aimed at improving outcomes by targeting NICT in patients with HF.