Jicheng Lv

Dr. Jicheng Lv


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 August 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
JLJicheng Lv
Jicheng Lv
LZLu-Xia Zhang
Lu-Xia Zhang

1 January 2016 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XXXinfang Xie
Xinfang Xie
EAEmily Atkins
Emily Atkins
JLJicheng Lv
Jicheng Lv
ABAlexander Bennett
Alexander Bennett
Bruce NealBruce Neal
Bruce Neal
ARAnthony Rodgers
Anthony Rodgers
Recent hypertension guidelines have reversed previous recommendations for lower blood pressure targets in high-risk patients, such as those with cardiovascular disease, renal disease, or diabetes. This change represents uncertainty about whether more intensive blood pressure-lowering strategies are associated with greater reductions in risk of major cardiovascular and renal events. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure-lowering strategies. For this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for trials published between Jan 1, 1950, and Nov 3, 2015. We included randomised controlled trials with at least 6 months' follow-up that randomly assigned participants to more intensive versus less intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment, with different blood pressure targets or different blood pressure changes from baseline. We did not use any age or language restrictions. We did a meta-analysis of blood pressure reductions on relative risk (RR) of major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death, separately and combined), and non-vascular and all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease, and adverse events, as well as albuminuria and progression of retinopathy in trials done in patients with diabetes. We identified 19 trials including 44,989 participants, in whom 2496 major cardiovascular events were recorded during a mean 3·8 years of follow-up (range 1·0-8·4 years). Our meta-analysis showed that after randomisation, patients in the more intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment group had mean blood pressure levels of 133/76 mm Hg, compared with 140/81 mm Hg in the less intensive treatment group. Intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment achieved RR reductions for major cardiovascular events (14% [95% CI 4-22]), myocardial infarction (13% [0-24]), stroke (22% [10-32]), albuminuria (10% [3-16]), and retinopathy progression (19% [0-34]). However, more intensive treatment had no clear effects on heart failure (15% [95% CI -11 to 34]), cardiovascular death (9% [-11 to 26]), total mortality (9% [-3 to 19]), or end-stage kidney disease (10% [-6 to 23]). The reduction in major cardiovascular events was consistent across patient groups, and additional blood pressure lowering had a clear benefit even in patients with systolic blood pressure lower than 140 mm Hg. The absolute benefits were greatest in trials in which all enrolled patients had vascular disease, renal disease, or diabetes. Serious adverse events associated with blood pressure lowering were only reported by six trials and had an event rate of 1·2% per year in intensive blood pressure-lowering group participants, compared with 0·9% in the less intensive treatment group (RR 1·35 [95% CI 0·93-1·97]). Severe hypotension was more frequent in the more intensive treatment regimen (RR 2·68 [1·21-5·89], p=0·015), but the absolute excess was small (0·3% vs 0·1% per person-year for the duration of follow-up). Intensive blood pressure lowering provided greater vascular protection than standard regimens. In high-risk patients, there are additional benefits from more intensive blood pressure lowering, including for those with systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg. The net absolute benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering in high-risk individuals are large. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

1 May 2016 in American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XXXinfang Xie
Xinfang Xie
YLYouxia Liu
Youxia Liu
VPVlado Perkovic
Vlado Perkovic
XLXiangling Li
Xiangling Li
TNToshiharu Ninomiya
Toshiharu Ninomiya
HWHaiyan Wang
Haiyan Wang

1 October 2012 in Kidney International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NZNa Zhao
Na Zhao
PHPing Hou
Ping Hou
JLJicheng Lv
Jicheng Lv
ZMZina Moldoveanu
Zina Moldoveanu
YIFU LIYIFU LI
YIFU LI
HZHong Zhang
Hong Zhang

1 August 2015 in American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJingjing Da
Jingjing Da
XXXinfang Xie
Xinfang Xie
MWMyles Wolf
Myles Wolf
SDSinee Disthabanchong
Sinee Disthabanchong
JWJinwei Wang
Jinwei Wang
HWHaiyan Wang
Haiyan Wang

6 March 2013 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WHWanyin Hou
Wanyin Hou
JLJicheng Lv
Jicheng Lv
VPVlado Perkovic
Vlado Perkovic
LYLihong Yang
Lihong Yang
NZNa Zhao
Na Zhao
HWHaiyan Wang
Haiyan Wang
The effects of statin therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain uncertain. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of statin on major clinical outcomes. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for trials published between 1970 and November 2011. We included prospective, randomized, controlled trials assessing the effects of statins on cardiovascular outcomes in people with kidney disease. Summary estimates of relative risk (RR) reductions were calculated with a random effects model. Thirty-one trials that include at least one event were identified, providing data for 48 429 patients with CKD, including 6690 major cardiovascular events and 6653 deaths. Statin therapy produced a 23% RR reduction (16–30) for major cardiovascular events (P<0.001), an 18% RR reduction (8–27) for coronary events, and 9% (1–16) reduction in cardiovascular or all-cause deaths, but had no significantly effect on stroke (21%, –12 to 44) or no clear effect on kidney failure events (5%, −1 to 10). Adverse events were not significantly increased by statins, including hepatic (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.92–1.39) or muscular disorders (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95–1.09). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the relative effects of statin therapy in CKD were significantly reduced in people with advanced CKD (P < 0.001) but that the absolute risk reductions were comparable. Statin therapy reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease including those receiving dialysis.