The effects of cancer surgery and treatment harm patients’ life and working ability: major causes of this can be intensified by the postoperative symptoms. This study, the first part of the HEAGIS project (Health and Employment after Gastrointestinal Surgery), proposes a method to assess patients and caregivers’ competences in dealing with postoperative course and the related needs to improve the adequate competences. In this observational study, an ad hoc structured interview was conducted with 47 patients and 15 caregivers between the third and fifteenth postoperative day. Oesophageal (38%), esophagogastric junction (13%), gastric (30%), colon (8%) and rectum (11%) cancer patients were considered. Computerized textual data analysis methodology was used to identify levels of competences. Text analysis highlighted three different levels (low, medium and high) of four specific types of patients and caregivers’ competences. In particular, the overall trend of the preview of future scenarios and use of resource competences was low. Less critical were situation evaluation and preview repercussion of own actions’ competences. Caregivers’ trends were similar. The Kruskal–Wallis test did not distinguish any differences in the level of competences related to the characteristics of the participants. Patients and caregivers are not accurate in planning the future after surgery, using personal beliefs rather than referring to physicians, and not recognizing adequate resources. The medium-low competences’ trend leads to unexpected critical situations, and patients could not deal with them in a maximally effective way. Both patients and caregivers should be taken over by healthcare professionals to improve patients’ competences and make the curative surgery effective in daily life.

There is a high postoperative morbidity rate after cancer surgery, that impairs patients’ self-management, job condition and economic strength. This paper describes the results of a peculiar psychological intervention on patients undergoing surgery for esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer. The intervention aimed to enhance patients’ competences in the management of postoperative daily life. A narrative approach (M.A.D.I.T.—Methodology for the Analysis of Computerised Text Data) was used to create a questionnaire, Health and Employment after Gastro-Intestinal Surgery—Dialogical Questionnaire, HEAGIS-DQ, that assesses four competences. It was administered to 48 participants. Results were used as guidance for specific intervention, structured on patients’ competence profiles. The intervention lasted nine months after surgery and was structured in weekly to monthly therapeutic sessions. Quality of Life questionnaires were administered too. At the end of the intervention, 94% of patients maintained their job and only 10% of patients asked for financial support. The mean self-perception of health-related quality of life was 71.2. The distribution of three of four competences increased after nine months (p < 0.05). Despite economic difficulties due to lasting symptoms after surgery, and to the current pandemic scenario, a structured intervention with patients let them to resume their jobs and continue activities after surgery.

Previous studies have shown that, after postoperative recovery from upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery for cancer, patients use peculiar modalities to describe their health. The purpose of this study is to determine how upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer surgery is considered by patients when they set their health. A structured interview was developed and 47 consecutive patients were interviewed postoperatively. Answers were analyzed through M.A.D.I.T., a quantitative and qualitative methodology that allows for the detection of discursive processes comprising the text, beyond thematic analysis. Four dimensions have been analyzed: representation of the postoperative period in daily life; use of resources; participation in achieving the clinical objective after hospital discharge; and continuing to respect the surgeons’ indications. A corpus of 2374 text occurrences was analyzed. Without differences between types of surgery, surgical patients described the time after surgical intervention as a critical scenario. Patients expressed their personal opinions, expecting normality after surgery and having difficulty envisioning the future: their representation of inflexibility in the postoperative period prevented them from finding new coping strategies. Overall, across all four dimensions, participants used stabilization discursive modalities in more than 50% of cases, representative of a situation bound within strict ties and personal theories. When defining their health, cancer surgery patients tend not to consider their condition as a new and different one from before; they imagine that they will be able to fully resume their previous habits. However, this can risk undermining the achievement of the clinical objective. Thus, during early surgical consultations, as well as in surgical recovery, exploring differences after surgery and solutions could help patients in their engagement with surgical outcomes and consequences.