Fritz Bopp

Prof. Fritz Bopp

Department of Physics, University of Siegen
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 January 2008 in Physical Review C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fritz BoppFritz Bopp
Fritz Bopp
JRJ. Ranft
J. Ranft
RER. Engel
R. Engel
SRS. Roesler
S. Roesler
To understand baryon stopping we analyze new Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and Fermilab data within the framework of the multichain Monte Carlo DPMJET-III. The present consideration is restricted to hadron-hadron and d-Au collisions, where the present version of the model can be trusted.

17 February 2017 in Foundations of Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fritz BoppFritz Bopp
Fritz Bopp

1 May 2006 in The European Physical Journal A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fritz BoppFritz Bopp
Fritz Bopp
YSYu. M. Shabelski
Yu. M. Shabelski

1 December 2005 in Physics of Atomic Nuclei
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fritz BoppFritz Bopp
Fritz Bopp
YSYu. M. Shabelski
Yu. M. Shabelski
The processes of baryon-number transfer due to string-junction propagation in rapidity is considered. It has a significant effect on the net baryon production in pp collisions at mid-rapidities and an even larger effect in the forward hemisphere in the cases of πp and γp interactions. The results of numerical calculations in the framework of the quark-gluon string model are in reasonable agreement with the data with the same parameter values for different energies.

4 December 2018 in Foundations of Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fritz BoppFritz Bopp
Fritz Bopp

20 November 2017 in Proceedings
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
Fritz BoppFritz Bopp
Fritz Bopp
The letter submitted is an executive summary of our previous paper. To solve the Einstein Podolsky Rosen “paradox” the two boundary quantum mechanics is taken as self consistent interpretation of quantum dynamics. The difficulty with this interpretation is to reconcile it with classical physics. To avoid macroscopic backward causation two “corresponding transition rules” are formulated which specify needed properties of macroscopic observations and manipulations. The apparent classical causal decision tree requires to understand the classically unchosen options. They are taken to occur with an “incomplete knowledge” of the boundary states typically in macroscopic considerations. The precise boundary conditions with given phases then select the actual measured path and this selection is mistaken to happen at the time of measurement. The apparent time direction of the decision tree originates in an assumed relative proximity to the initial state. Only the far away final state allows for classically distinct options to be selected from. Cosmologically the picture could correspond to a big bang initial and a hugely extended final state scenario. It is speculated that it might also hold for a big bang/big crunch world. If this would be the case the Born probability postulate could find a natural explanation if we coexist in the expanding and the correlated CPT conjugate contracting world.