Background: Obstructive congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract have a high risk of kidney failure if not surgically corrected. Dynamic renal scintigraphy is the gold standard technique to evaluate drainage curves and split renal function (SRF). Objectives: To compare functional magnetic resonance (MR) urography with dynamic renal scintigraphy in measuring volumetric SRF and in the classification of drainage curves in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected patients with hydroureteronephrosis or pelvicalyceal dilatation at renal ultrasound, who underwent both functional MR urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy (DRS) within 6 months. DRS studies were evaluated by a single nuclear medicine physician with a double reading. Functional MR urography renograms were blind evaluated twice by two radiologists. The functional MR urographyintra- and inter-reading agreements as well as the agreement between the two imaging techniques were calculated. SRF was evaluated by Area Under the Curve and Rutland-Patlak methods. Drainage curves were classified as normal, borderline or accumulation patterns by both the techniques. Results: Fifty-two children were studied, 14 with bilateral involvement. A total of 104 kidney-urinary tracts were considered: 38 normal and 66 dilated. Considering Area Under the Curve and Rutland-Patlak for SRF, the intra- and inter-reader agreements of functional MR urography had excellent and good results, respectively, and the two techniques demonstrated a good concordance (r2: 67% for Area Under the Curve and 72% for Rutland-Patlak). Considering drainage curves, the inter-readers agreement for functional MR urography and the concordance between the two techniques were moderate (Cohen's k, respectively, 55.7 and 56.3%). Conclusions: According to our results, there are no significant differences between functional MR urography and DRS in measuring volumetric SRF and in the classification of drainage curves in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.

The role of MR Arterial-Spin-Labeling Cerebral Blood Flow maps (ASL-CBF) in the assessment of pediatric focal epilepsy is still debated. We aim to compare the Seizure Onset Zone (SOZ) detection rate of three methods of evaluation of ASL-CBF: 1) qualitative visual (qCBF), 2) z-score voxel-based quantitative analysis of index of asymmetry (AI-CBF), and 3) z-score voxel-based cluster analysis of the quantitative difference of patient’s CBF from the normative data of an age-matched healthy population (cCBF). Interictal ASL-CBF were acquired in 65 pediatric patients with focal epilepsy: 26 with focal brain lesions and 39 with a normal MRI. All hypoperfusion areas visible in at least 3 contiguous images of qCBF analysis were identified. In the quantitative evaluations, clusters with a significant z-score AI-CBF ≤ −1.64 and areas with a z-score cCBF ≤ −1.64 were considered potentially related to the SOZ. These areas were compared with the SOZ defined by the anatomo-electro-clinical data. In patients with a positive MRI, SOZ was correctly identified in 27% of patients using qCBF, 73% using AI-CBF, and 77% using cCBF. In negative MRI patients, SOZ was identified in 18% of patients using qCBF, in 46% using AI-CBF, and in 64% using cCBF (p < 0.001). Quantitative analyses of ASL-CBF maps increase the detection rate of SOZ compared to the qualitative method, principally in negative MRI patients.