Summary: The aim of this review was to undertake a survey of researchers working with plant‐parasitic nematodes in order to determine a ‘top 10’ list of these pathogens based on scientific and economic importance. Any such list will not be definitive as economic importance will vary depending on the region of the world in which a researcher is based. However, care was taken to include researchers from as many parts of the world as possible when carrying out the survey. The top 10 list emerging from the survey is composed of: (1) root‐knot nematodes ( M eloidogyne spp.); (2) cyst nematodes ( H eterodera and G lobodera spp.); (3) root lesion nematodes ( P ratylenchus spp.); (4) the burrowing nematode R adopholus similis ; (5) D itylenchus dipsaci ; (6) the pine wilt nematode B ursaphelenchus xylophilus ; (7) the reniform nematode R otylenchulus reniformis ; (8) X iphinema index (the only virus vector nematode to make the list); (9) N acobbus aberrans ; and (10) A phelenchoides besseyi . The biology of each nematode (or nematode group) is reviewed briefly.

Procedures are described for measuring sucrose in plant extracts or freeze-dried tissue in the range between 10⁻⁷ and 10⁻¹⁴ moles. The method is based on the destruction of pre-existing glucose and fructose, followed by the hydrolysis of sucrose and reduction of NADP⁺ by a series of coupled enzymic reactions. Depending on the sensitivity required, the NADPH is determined directly with a spectrophotometer or a fluorometer, or is amplified as much as 30,000 times before fluorometric assay. The procedures suggested for the macro level are simpler than current methods, and those suggested for microanalysis are several orders of magnitude more sensitive.

Background and Purpose—: The characteristics of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may vary by ICH location because of differences in the distribution of underlying cerebral small vessel diseases. Therefore, we investigated the incidence, characteristics, and outcome of lobar and nonlobar ICH. Methods—: In a population-based, prospective inception cohort study of ICH, we used multiple overlapping sources of case ascertainment and follow-up to identify and validate ICH diagnoses in 2010 to 2011 in an adult population of 695 335. Results—: There were 128 participants with first-ever primary ICH. The overall incidence of lobar ICH was similar to nonlobar ICH (9.8 [95% confidence interval, 7.7–12.4] versus 8.6 [95% confidence interval, 6.7–11.1] per 100 000 adults/y). At baseline, adults with lobar ICH were more likely to have preceding dementia (21% versus 5%; P =0.01), lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (median, 13 versus 14; P =0.03), larger ICHs (median, 38 versus 11 mL; P <0.001), subarachnoid extension (57% versus 5%; P <0.001), and subdural extension (15% versus 3%; P =0.02) than those with nonlobar ICH. One-year case fatality was lower after lobar ICH than after nonlobar ICH (adjusted odds ratio for death at 1 year: lobar versus nonlobar ICH 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.07–0.63; P =0.006, after adjustment for known predictors of outcome). There were 4 recurrent ICHs, which occurred exclusively in survivors of lobar ICH (annual risk of recurrent ICH after lobar ICH, 11.8%; 95% confidence interval, 4.6%–28.5% versus 0% after nonlobar ICH; log-rank P =0.04). Conclusions—: The baseline characteristics and outcome of lobar ICH differ from other locations.