Self-control refers to the ability to override impulses and behave in accordance with societal norms, and deficits in self-control are strongly associated with conduct problems, externalizing disorders, crime, and violence. Here, we examine the psychometric properties of the Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) and its refined version (BSCS-R) among a forensic sample (n = 131) of incarcerated male youth and a school sample of male (n = 257) and female (n = 213) youth from Portugal. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original one-factor structure of the BSCS and the refined two-factor structure of the BSCS-R obtained adequate fits. The BSCS demonstrated strong measurement invariance across gender and setting (forensic versus school), while the BSCS-R only revealed gender measurement invariance. The BSCS also tended to perform better that the BSCS-R in terms of other psychometric properties, including internal consistency measured by Alpha and Omega coefficients, discriminant and convergent validities, criterion validity, and known-groups validity. Findings support the use of the BSCS among justice-involved and community youth, but caution is advised regarding the use of its refined version in forensic settings.

Background Our aims were to evaluate the neurocognitive performance in adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) and to determine whether parameters of fetal development evaluated in neonates, such as head circumference, length, weight, and Apgar scores, are somehow related to their neurocognitive performance. Methods We evaluated 77 CHD patients (43 males) aged from 13 to 18 years old (mean = 15.04 ± 1.86), 46 cyanotic, 23 with tetralogy of Fallot (TF), 23 with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and 31 acyanotic with ventricular septal defect (VSD) enrolled in this study. The control group included 16 healthy children (11 males) ages ranging from 13 to 18 years old (mean = 15.69 years ± 1.44 years). All assessment measures for CHD patients were once obtained in a tertiary hospital; the control group was evaluated in school. Neuropsychological assessment included Wechsler's Digit Test, direct and reverse (WDD and WDR) and Symbol Search, Rey's Complex Figure (RCF), BADS's Key Searching Test, Color-Word Stroop Test (CWS), Trail Making Test (TMT), and Logical Memory Task (LMT). We evaluated some fetal parameters, such as head circumference, weight and length assessed at birth, and neonatal parameters, such as Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. We also registered some surgical parameters, such as the age at first operation and the number of surgeries. Results CHD patients compared with control group showed lower scores on every test, except for logical memory task. Patients with VSD when compared with patients with TF and TGA showed better results in all neuropsychological tests, although the only significant differences were in RCF, copy (F = 4936; P = .010). Several correlations were apparent between fetal/neonatal parameters and neuropsychological abilities in each type of CHD. However, head circumference at birth stands as the main correlation with cognitive development later on in all kinds of CHD (WDD: rho = .339, P = .011; RCF, copy: rho = 0.297, P = .027; CWS, interference: rho = 0.283, P = .036; TMT-A: rho = −0.321, P = .017). We analyzed the predicting relevance of several variables to cognitive performance of adolescents with CHD and confirmed that “cyanosis” stands as the main predictor (â = −4.758; t = −2.622; P = .011). Conclusions Adolescents with CHD have worse neuropsychological performance than the control group, mainly the cyanotic patients. Fetal circulation seems to have impact on cerebral and somatic growth, predicting cognitive impairment in adolescents with CHD.

Long term psychosocial outcomes of congenital heart disease (CHD) in adolescents and young adults

The objectives of this study were to assess the neuropsychological performance (NP) of adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), comparing them with a group of healthy controls, to determine whether there are different neurocognitive phenotypes in CHD, and to identify their relation to sociodemographic, neonatal, clinical and psychological adjustment variables. A total of 217 CHD patients (116 male, aged 15.73±2.68 years) and 80 controls (35 male, age 16.76±2.22 years) underwent an extensive neuropsychological assessment and analysis of psychological adjustment. CHD patients had significantly poorer NP than healthy controls in all neurocognitive domains. Three different phenotypes of NP in CHD patients were identified: non-impaired (NI), moderately impaired (MI) and globally impaired (GI). They differed in all dimensions of NP. The GI cluster showed fewer years of schooling (p=0.025) and lower neonatal indicators such as head circumference (p=0.019), 1-min Apgar score (p=0.006), birth weight (p=0.05) and length (p=0.034) than the NI cluster. In the MI and GI clusters, there were more cyanotic forms of disease, including tetralogy of Fallot and transposition of the great arteries. The GI cluster presented more difficulties with psychological adjustment, including social (p=0.038), attention (p=0.001) and aggressive (p=0.003) problems. CHD patients have poorer NP than controls. NP in the CHD group can be classified in three clusters that reflect different levels of neuropsychological functioning, which is sensitive to social, neonatal and psychological adjustment variables.

This paper discusses the sentencing purposes for penal penalties, judges’ perceptions of sentencing purposes and prison sentences, and the effects of penal sanctions. We examine judges’ positions towards different penalties, with a focus on imprisonment, since their views on the different penalties are related to their sentencing decision-making. Understanding these views is then critical for several practical and political purposes, including bridging the gap between academic discourse and legal practice. We accessed judges’ views on penal sanctions through a questionnaire and an interview. Our sample is compounded by the judges of the criminal courts from the three major cities in Portugal. Despite the most recent criminological empirical knowledge, judges valued imprisonment as the most adequate sentence, both for different crimes and for different judicial purposes. This result is not consistent with viewing imprisonment as a ‘last resort’ solution. Indeed, we did not find this ‘last resort’ position in our data, and it is not apparent in the judicial statistics on imprisonment rates. Our data highlight the importance of increasing judges’ training on criminological and sociological issues as well as the importance of changing the influence of their personal beliefs regarding penal sanctions into research-based positions.