Teresa Gianferrara

Dr. Teresa Gianferrara

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 June 2009 in Dalton Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TGTeresa Gianferrara
Teresa Gianferrara
IBIoannis Bratsos
Ioannis Bratsos
EAEnzo Alessio
Enzo Alessio
The development of new metal anticancer compounds is a challenge for inorganic chemists. We have to face the fact that four decades of research in this field have only produced a small number of clinically used compounds, most often developed through serendipity rather than through rational chemical design. Nevertheless, by virtue of the wealth of knowledge acquired in these years, medicinal inorganic chemistry is probably mature for making significant steps forward and there are great expectations for future developments. With the aim of contributing to the rationalization of this field, we suggest here a categorization of metal anticancer compounds into five classes based on their mode of action: (i) the metal has a functional role, i.e. it must bind to the biological target; (ii) the metal has a structural role, i.e. it is instrumental in determining the shape of the compound and binding to the biological target occurs through non-covalent interactions; (iii) the metal is a carrier for active ligands that are delivered in vivo; (iv) the metal compound is a catalyst; and (v) the metal compound is photoactive and behaves as a photo-sensitizer. Selected examples for each category are given. The few metal anticancer drugs that are in clinical use are all believed to be functional compounds. Our classification, that is clearly focused on the metal compound and is independent from the nature of its bio-target(s)—most often still unknown—has the purpose of providing an intellectual tool that might be helpful in the rational development of new drugs.

1 November 2007 in Chimia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IBIoannis Bratsos
Ioannis Bratsos
SJStephanie Jedner
Stephanie Jedner
TGTeresa Gianferrara
Teresa Gianferrara
EAEnzo Alessio
Enzo Alessio
Two ruthenium compounds, namely [ImH]trans-[RuCl4(Im)(dmso-S)] (NAMI-A, Im = imidazole) and [IndH] trans-[RuCl4(Ind)2] (KP1019, Ind = indazole) have already completed phase I clinical trials as anticancer agents. They both have properties different from platinum anticancer drugs: for example, NAMI-A is selectively active against metastases of solid tumors. They show that in the field of anticancer metal drugs a new approach, based on targeted therapies, is possible. After a concise history of ruthenium anticancer compounds, this contribution will focus on ruthenium-dmso complexes and, in particular, on NAMI-A. Particular emphasis is given on the challenges that are inherent to this field: how to develop new anticancer ruthenium compounds and how to select new active compounds that manifest their anticancer activity through non-conventional mechanisms.

21 May 2010 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TGTeresa Gianferrara
Teresa Gianferrara
ABAlberta Bergamo
Alberta Bergamo
IBIoannis Bratsos
Ioannis Bratsos
BMBarbara Milani
Barbara Milani
CSCinzia Spagnul
Cinzia Spagnul
EAEnzo Alessio
Enzo Alessio

24 August 2005 in European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBarbara Serli
Barbara Serli
EZEnnio Zangrando
Ennio Zangrando
TGTeresa Gianferrara
Teresa Gianferrara
CSClaudine Scolaro
Claudine Scolaro
PDPaul Dyson
Paul Dyson
EAEnzo Alessio
Enzo Alessio

1 October 2003 in Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBarbara Serli
Barbara Serli
EZEnnio Zangrando
Ennio Zangrando
TGTeresa Gianferrara
Teresa Gianferrara
LYLesley Yellowlees
Lesley Yellowlees
EAEnzo Alessio
Enzo Alessio

27 August 2009 in Dalton Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TGTeresa Gianferrara
Teresa Gianferrara
IBIoannis Bratsos
Ioannis Bratsos
EIElisabetta Iengo
Elisabetta Iengo
BMBarbara Milani
Barbara Milani
AOAdrian Oštrić
Adrian Oštrić
EAEnzo Alessio
Enzo Alessio
The conjugation of porphyrins to metal fragments is a strategy for making new compounds that are expected to combine the phototoxicity and the tumour-localization properties of the porphyrin chromophore with the cytotoxicity of the metal fragment for additive antitumour effect. We report here the preparation of new classes of porphyrin–ruthenium conjugates with potential bio-medical applications. Ruthenium was chosen because several Ru compounds have shown promising anticancer activity. The conjugation with the porphyrin moiety was accomplished either through peripheral pyridyl rings (e.g.meso-4′-tetrapyridylporphyrin, 4′TPyP) or through bpy units (e.g.meso-(p-bpy-phenyl)porphyrins, bpyn-PPs, n = 1–4). The number of Ru fragments attached to the porphyrins ranges from 1 to 4 and the total charge of the conjugates from −4 to +8. Different types of peripheral fragments, both Ru(III) and Ru(II), have been used: in some cases they are structurally similar to established anticancer compounds. Examples are [Na]4[4′TPyP{trans-RuCl4(dmso-S)}4] (2), that bears four NAMI-type Ru(III) fragments, or [4′TPyP{Ru([9]aneS3)(en)}4][CF3SO3]8 (3) and [bpy4-PP{Ru([9]aneS3)(dmso-S)}4][CF3SO3]8 (9) (en = ethane-1,2-diamine, [9]aneS3 = 1,4,7-trithiacyclononane) that have four half-sandwich Ru(II) compounds. The Ru fragments may either contain one or more labile ligands, such as in 2 or in 9, or be coordinatively saturated and substitutionally inert, such as in 3 or in [bpy4-PP{Ru([12]aneS4)}4][CF3SO3]8 (11) ([12]aneS4 = 1,4,7,10-tetrathiacyclododecane). Most of the ruthenium-porphyrin conjugates described in this work are soluble—at least moderately—in aqueous solution and are thus suitable for biological investigations, in particular for cytotoxicity and photo-cytotoxicity tests.