Andrew Southam

Dr. Andrew Southam


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008 in Analytical Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHuifeng Wu
Huifeng Wu
ASAndrew Southam
Andrew Southam
AHAdam Hines
Adam Hines
MVMark Viant
Mark Viant

3 September 2020 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LFLivingstone Fultang
Livingstone Fultang
SBSarah Booth
Sarah Booth
OYOrli Yogev
Orli Yogev
BCBarbara Martins da Costa
Barbara Martins da Costa
VTVanessa Tubb
Vanessa Tubb
CSCarmela De Santo
Carmela De Santo
Hematological and solid cancers catabolize the semiessential amino acid arginine to drive cell proliferation. However, the resulting low arginine microenvironment also impairs chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) cell proliferation, limiting their efficacy in clinical trials against hematological and solid malignancies. T cells are susceptible to the low arginine microenvironment because of the low expression of the arginine resynthesis enzymes argininosuccinate synthase (ASS) and ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC). We demonstrate that T cells can be reengineered to express functional ASS or OTC enzymes, in concert with different chimeric antigen receptors. Enzyme modifications increase CAR-T cell proliferation, with no loss of CAR cytotoxicity or increased exhaustion. In vivo, enzyme-modified CAR-T cells lead to enhanced clearance of leukemia or solid tumor burden, providing the first metabolic modification to enhance CAR-T cell therapies.

19 May 2007 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAndrew Southam
Andrew Southam
TPTristan G. Payne
Tristan G. Payne
HCHelen J. Cooper
Helen J. Cooper
TATheodoros N. Arvanitis
Theodoros N. Arvanitis
MVMark Viant
Mark Viant
Direct infusion nanoelectrospray Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (DI nESI FT-ICR MS) offers high mass accuracy and resolution for analyzing complex metabolite mixtures. High dynamic range across a wide mass range, however, can only be achieved at the expense of mass accuracy, since the large numbers of ions entering the ICR detector induce adverse space-charge effects. Here we report an optimized strategy for wide-scan DI nESI FT-ICR MS that increases dynamic range but maintains high mass accuracy. It comprises the collection of multiple adjacent selected ion monitoring (SIM) windows that are stitched together using novel algorithms. The final SIM-stitching method, derived from several optimization experiments, comprises 21 adjoining SIM windows each of width m/z 30 (from m/z 70 to 500; adjacent windows overlap by m/z 10) with an automated gain control (AGC) target of 1 × 105 charges. SIM-stitching and wide-scan range (WSR; Thermo Electron) were compared using a defined standard to assess mass accuracy and a liver extract to assess peak count and dynamic range. SIM-stitching decreased the maximum mass error by 1.3- and 4.3-fold, and increased the peak count by 5.3- and 1.8-fold, versus WSR (AGC targets of 1 × 105 and 5 × 105, respectively). SIM-stitching achieved an rms mass error of 0.18 ppm and detected over 3000 peaks in liver extract. This novel approach increases metabolome coverage, has very high mass accuracy, and at 5.5 min/sample is conducive for high-throughput metabolomics.

16 August 2016 in Metabolomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEmily G. Armitage
Emily G. Armitage
ASAndrew Southam
Andrew Southam
Introduction Cellular metabolism is altered during cancer initiation and progression, which allows cancer cells to increase anabolic synthesis, avoid apoptosis and adapt to low nutrient and oxygen availability. The metabolic nature of cancer enables patient cancer status to be monitored by metabolomics and lipidomics. Additionally, monitoring metabolic status of patients or biological models can be used to greater understand the action of anticancer therapeutics. Objectives Discuss how metabolomics and lipidomics can be used to (i) identify metabolic biomarkers of cancer and (ii) understand the mechanism-of-action of anticancer therapies. Discuss considerations that can maximize the clinical value of metabolic cancer biomarkers including case–control, prognostic and longitudinal study designs. Methods A literature search of the current relevant primary research was performed. Results Metabolomics and lipidomics can identify metabolic signatures that associate with cancer diagnosis, prognosis and disease progression. Discriminatory metabolites were most commonly linked to lipid or energy metabolism. Case–control studies outnumbered prognostic and longitudinal approaches. Prognostic studies were able to correlate metabolic features with future cancer risk, whereas longitudinal studies were most effective for studying cancer progression. Metabolomics and lipidomics can help to understand the mechanism-of-action of anticancer therapeutics and mechanisms of drug resistance. Conclusion Metabolomics and lipidomics can be used to identify biomarkers associated with cancer and to better understand anticancer therapies.

19 April 2011 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RWRalf J. M. Weber
Ralf J. M. Weber
ASAndrew Southam
Andrew Southam
USUlf Sommer
Ulf Sommer
MVMark Viant
Mark Viant

1 June 2009 in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPTristan G. Payne
Tristan G. Payne
ASAndrew Southam
Andrew Southam
TATheodoros N. Arvanitis
Theodoros N. Arvanitis
MVMark Viant
Mark Viant