Andrew Hersh

Mr. Andrew Hersh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hersh
Andrew Hersh
SASafwan Alomari
Safwan Alomari
BTBetty Tyler
Betty Tyler
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) constitutes a microvascular network responsible for excluding most drugs from the brain. Treatment of brain tumors is limited by the impermeability of the BBB and, consequently, survival outcomes for malignant brain tumors remain poor. Nanoparticles (NPs) represent a potential solution to improve drug transport to brain tumors, given their small size and capacity to target tumor cells. Here, we review the unique physical and chemical properties of NPs that aid in BBB transport and discuss mechanisms of NP transport across the BBB, including paracellular transport, carrier-mediated transport, and adsorptive- and receptor-mediated transcytosis. The major types of NPs investigated for treatment of brain tumors are detailed, including polymeric NPs, liposomes, solid lipid NPs, dendrimers, metals, quantum dots, and nanogels. In addition to their role in drug delivery, NPs can be used as imaging contrast agents and can be conjugated with imaging probes to assist in visualizing tumors, demarcating lesion boundaries and margins, and monitoring drug delivery and treatment response. Multifunctional NPs can be designed that are capable of targeting tumors for both imaging and therapeutic purposes. Finally, limitations of NPs for brain tumor treatment are discussed.

8 October 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hersh
Andrew Hersh
MBMeghana Bhimreddy
Meghana Bhimreddy
CWCarly Weber-Levine
Carly Weber-Levine
KJKelly Jiang
Kelly Jiang
SASafwan Alomari
Safwan Alomari
BTBetty Tyler
Betty Tyler
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary astrocytoma associated with short overall survival. Treatment for GBM primarily consists of maximal safe surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy using temozolomide. Nonetheless, recurrence and tumor progression is the norm, driven by tumor stem cell activity and a high mutational burden. Focused ultrasound (FUS) has shown promising results in preclinical and clinical trials for treatment of GBM and has received regulatory approval for the treatment of other neoplasms. Here, we review the range of applications for FUS in the treatment of GBM, which depend on parameters, including frequency, power, pulse duration, and duty cycle. Low-intensity FUS can be used to transiently open the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which restricts diffusion of most macromolecules and therapeutic agents into the brain. Under guidance from magnetic resonance imaging, the BBB can be targeted in a precise location to permit diffusion of molecules only at the vicinity of the tumor, preventing side effects to healthy tissue. BBB opening can also be used to improve detection of cell-free tumor DNA with liquid biopsies, allowing non-invasive diagnosis and identification of molecular mutations. High-intensity FUS can cause tumor ablation via a hyperthermic effect. Additionally, FUS can stimulate immunological attack of tumor cells, can activate sonosensitizers to exert cytotoxic effects on tumor tissue, and can sensitize tumors to radiation therapy. Finally, another mechanism under investigation, known as histotripsy, produces tumor ablation via acoustic cavitation rather than thermal effects.

31 July 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hersh
Andrew Hersh
HGHallie Francis Gaitsch
Hallie Francis Gaitsch
SASafwan Alomari
Safwan Alomari
DLDaniel Lubelski
Daniel Lubelski
BTBetty Tyler
Betty Tyler
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive tumor of the central nervous system categorized by the World Health Organization as a Grade 4 astrocytoma. Despite treatment with surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, outcomes remain poor, with a median survival of only 14-16 months. Although tumor regression is often observed initially after treatment, long-term recurrence or progression invariably occurs. Tumor growth, invasion, and recurrence is mediated by a unique population of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). Their high mutation rate and dysregulated transcriptional landscape augment their resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy, explaining the poor outcomes observed in patients. Consequently, GSCs have emerged as targets of interest in new treatment paradigms. Here, we review the unique properties of GSCs, including their interactions with the hypoxic microenvironment that drives their proliferation. We discuss vital signaling pathways in GSCs that mediate stemness, self-renewal, proliferation, and invasion, including the Notch, epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt, sonic hedgehog, transforming growth factor beta, Wnt, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and inhibitors of differentiation pathways. We also review epigenomic changes in GSCs that influence their transcriptional state, including DNA methylation, histone methylation and acetylation, and miRNA expression. The constituent molecular components of the signaling pathways and epigenomic regulators represent potential sites for targeted therapy, and representative examples of inhibitory molecules and pharmaceuticals are discussed. Continued investigation into the molecular pathways of GSCs and candidate therapeutics is needed to discover new effective treatments for GBM and improve survival.

23 April 2021 in Global Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDaniel Lubelski
Daniel Lubelski
AHAndrew Hersh
Andrew Hersh
TATej D. Azad
Tej D. Azad
JEJeff Ehresman
Jeff Ehresman
Zach PenningtonZach Pennington
Zach Pennington
Daniel M. SciubbaDaniel M. Sciubba
Daniel M. Sciubba
Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: To review the existing literature of prediction models in degenerative spinal surgery. Methods: Review of PubMed/Medline and Embase databases was conducted to identify articles between January 1, 2000 and March 1, 2020 that reported prediction model performance for outcomes following elective degenerative spine surgery. Results: Thirty-one articles were included. Twenty studies were of thoracolumbar, 5 were of cervical, and 6 included all spine patients. Five studies were externally validated. Prediction models were developed using machine learning (42%) and logistic regression (42%) as well as other techniques. Web-based calculators were included in 45% of published articles. Various outcomes were investigated, including complications, infection, length of stay, discharge disposition, reoperation, readmission, disability score, back pain, leg pain, return to work, and opioid dependence. Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity exists in methods used to develop prediction models of postoperative outcomes after degenerative spine surgery. Most internally validate their scores, but a few have been externally validated. Areas under the curve for most models range from 0.6 to 0.9. Techniques for development are becoming increasingly sophisticated with different machine learning tools. With further external validation, these models can be deployed online for patient, physician, and administrative use, and have the potential to optimize outcomes and maximize value in spine surgery.

24 June 2023 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNicholas Theodore
Nicholas Theodore
NMNikolay Martirosyan
Nikolay Martirosyan
AHAndrew Hersh
Andrew Hersh
JEJeff Ehresman
Jeff Ehresman
AAA. Karim Ahmed
A. Karim Ahmed
MHMark N. Hadley
Mark N. Hadley

26 May 2022 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Aladine A. ElsamadicyAladine A. Elsamadicy
Aladine A. Elsamadicy
JHJohn L. Havlik
John L. Havlik
BRBenjamin Reeves
Benjamin Reeves
JSJosiah Sherman
Josiah Sherman
AKAndrew B. Koo
Andrew B. Koo
DSDaniel M. Sciubba
Daniel M. Sciubba