In view of the global spread of multiresistant bacteria and the occurrence of panresistant bacteria, there is an urgent need for antimicrobials with novel modes of action. A promising class is antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), including them proline-rich AMPs (PrAMPs), which target the 70S ribosome to inhibit protein translation. Here, we present a new designer peptide, Api805, combining the N- and C-terminal sequences of PrAMPs Api137 and drosocin, respectively. Api805 was similarly active against two Escherichia coli B strains but was inactive against E. coli K12 strain BW25113. These different activities could not be explained by the dissociation constants measured for 70S ribosome preparations from E. coli K12 and B strains. Mutations in the SbmA transporter that PrAMPs use to pass the inner membrane or proteolytic degradation of Api805 by lysate proteases could not explain this either. Interestingly, Api805 seems not to bind to the known binding sites of PrAMPs at the 70S ribosome and inhibited in vitro protein translation, independent of release factors, most likely using a “multimodal effect”. Interestingly, Api805 entered the E. coli B strain Rosetta faster and at larger quantities than the E. coli K-12 strain BW25113, which may be related to the different LPS core structure. In conclusion, slight structural changes in PrAMPs significantly altered their binding sites and mechanisms of action, allowing for the design of different antibiotic classes.

The global spread of multi- and pan-resistant bacteria has triggered research to identify novel strategies to fight these pathogens, such as antimicrobial peptides and, more recently, bacteriophages. In a proof-of-concept study, we have genetically modified lytic T7Select phages targeting Escherichia coli Rosetta by integrating DNA sequences derived from the proline-rich antimicrobial peptide, apidaecin. This allowed testing of our hypothesis that apidaecins and bacteriophages can synergistically act on phage-sensitive and phage-resistant E. coli cells and overcome the excessive cost of peptide drugs by using infected cells to express apidaecins before cell lysis. Indeed, the addition of the highly active synthetic apidaecin analogs, Api802 and Api806, to T7Select phage-infected E. coli Rosetta cultures prevented or delayed the growth of potentially phage-resistant E. coli Rosetta strains. However, high concentrations of Api802 also reduced the T7Select phage fitness. Additionally, plasmids encoding Api802, Api806, and Api810 sequences transformed into E. coli Rosetta allowed the production of satisfactory peptide quantities. When these sequences were integrated into the T7Select phage genome carrying an N-terminal green fluorescent protein (GFP-) tag to monitor the expression in infected E. coli Rosetta cells, the GFP–apidaecin analogs were produced in reasonable quantities. However, when Api802, Api806 and Api810 sequences were integrated into the T7Select phage genome, expression was below detection limits and an effect on the growth of potentially phage-resistant E. coli Rosetta strains was not observed for Api802 and Api806. In conclusion, we were able to show that apidaecins can be integrated into the T7Select phage genome to induce their expression in host cells, but further research is required to optimize the engineered T7Select phages for higher expression levels of apidaecins to achieve the expected synergistic effects that were visible when the T7Select phages and synthetic Api802 and Api806 were added to E. coli Rosetta cultures.