Candidiasis is a highly pervasive infection posing major health risks, especially for immunocompromised populations. Pathogenic Candida species have evolved intrinsic and acquired resistance to a variety of antifungal medications. The primary goal of this literature review is to summarize the molecular mechanisms associated with antifungal resistance in Candida species. Resistance can be conferred via gain-of-function mutations in target pathway genes or their transcriptional regulators. Therefore, an overview of the known gene mutations is presented for the following antifungals: azoles (fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and itraconazole), echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin), polyenes (amphotericin B and nystatin) and 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC). The following mutation hot spots were identified: (1) ergosterol biosynthesis pathway mutations (ERG11 and UPC2), resulting in azole resistance; (2) overexpression of the efflux pumps, promoting azole resistance (transcription factor genes: tac1 and mrr1; transporter genes: CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, PDR16 and SNQ2); (3) cell wall biosynthesis mutations (FKS1, FKS2 and PDR1), conferring resistance to echinocandins; (4) mutations of nucleic acid synthesis/repair genes (FCY1, FCY2 and FUR1), resulting in 5-FC resistance; and (5) biofilm production, promoting general antifungal resistance. This review also provides a summary of standardized inhibitory breakpoints obtained from international guidelines for prominent Candida species. Notably, N. glabrata, P. kudriavzevii and C. auris demonstrate fluconazole resistance.

Smoking during cancer treatment is associated with reduced treatment response and cancer recurrence in patients with tobacco-related cancers. The purpose of this study was to examine smoking characteristics in head and neck cancer patients (n = 503) with a history of smoking and examine the impact of an intensive clinical tobacco intervention to patients who were currently smoking. All participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire at study enrollment which examined smoking behaviours, motivations to quit, and strategies used to cessate smoking. Follow-up assessments were completed at 6- and 12-months which monitored whether patients had quit smoking, remained cessated, or continued to smoke since study recruitment. For those who were currently smoking (n = 186, 37.0%), an intensive clinical tobacco intervention that utilized the 3A’s—Ask, Advise, Arrange—and the Opt-Out approach was offered to assist with smoking cessation at their new patient visit and followed-up weekly during their head and neck radiation therapy for 7 weeks. At 6 months, 23.7% (n = 41) of those who were smoking successfully quit; 51.2% quit ‘cold turkey’ (defined as using no smoking cessation assistance, aids or pharmacotherapy to quit), while 34.9% used pharmacotherapy (varenicline (Champix)) to quit. On average, it took those who were smoking 1–5 attempts to quit, but once they quit they remained cessated for the duration of the study. Although the head and neck cancer patients in this study reported high levels of nicotine dependence, many were able to successfully cessate.

Rapid and accurate identification of Candida species is critical for guiding antifungal therapy, especially with the emergence of intrinsically resistant pathogens. However, diagnostics using culture-based methods remain slow and labor-intensive, limiting timely treatment decisions. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic performance and clinical applicability of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for Candida species identification using a PubMed search completed on 23 June 2025. A total of 888 records were screened, 333 full-text articles were assessed, and 158 studies were included based on criteria including comparison with standard diagnostic methods, diagnostic performance reporting, and involvement of clinical samples. PCR-based approaches were the most widely used, including conventional, nested, multiplex, real-time, and droplet digital PCR. Isothermal methods such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) were increasingly represented. Common molecular targets included the ITS and 18S/28S rDNA regions. The risk of bias assessment was completed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Diagnostic performance varied depending on assay design, specimen type, gene target, and reference method. Excellent specificity and low limits of detection were achieved, especially with isothermal platforms offering the shortest turnaround times and greatest potential for point-of-care implementation. Multiplex assays were particularly advantageous for detecting mixed-species samples, while highly specific assays were optimal for distinguishing clinically important species such as Candidozyma auris, Nakaseomyces glabratus, and Pichia kudriavzevii. Overall, NAATs represent a promising diagnostic tool for Candida species identification, but broader clinical adoption will require improved standardization, validation across diverse patient populations, and clearer interpretation of fungal burden in the context of colonization versus infection.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major contributor to colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence following curative-intent treatment, yet conventional surveillance methods may fail to detect residual disease at its earliest stages. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive biomarker for MRD detection and postoperative monitoring. We conducted a structured PubMed-based literature review and included 94 publications evaluating ctDNA in CRC. Across the literature, postoperative ctDNA positivity was consistently associated with increased recurrence risk and poorer disease-free and overall survival, while serial monitoring improved detection sensitivity and enabled assessment of treatment response. ctDNA frequently identified molecular recurrence approximately 2.5–11.5 months before conventional surveillance. Both tumor-informed and tumor-naive strategies were represented, using PCR/ddPCR, targeted next-generation sequencing, whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, methylation-based assays, and emerging multiomic approaches. Although ctDNA demonstrates strong prognostic value, evidence supporting treatment modification based solely on ctDNA status remains limited. Further prospective randomized trials, assay standardization, and consensus clinical guidelines are required before routine implementation. Overall, ctDNA is a promising tool for recurrence prediction, surveillance, and precision management of CRC.