Additive manufacturing (AM, 3D printing) is used in many fields and different industries. In the medical and dental field, every patient is unique and, therefore, AM has significant potential in personalized and customized solutions. This review explores what additive manufacturing processes and materials are utilized in medical and dental applications, especially focusing on processes that are less commonly used. The processes are categorized in ISO/ASTM process classes: powder bed fusion, material extrusion, VAT photopolymerization, material jetting, binder jetting, sheet lamination and directed energy deposition combined with classification of medical applications of AM. Based on the findings, it seems that directed energy deposition is utilized rarely only in implants and sheet lamination rarely for medical models or phantoms. Powder bed fusion, material extrusion and VAT photopolymerization are utilized in all categories. Material jetting is not used for implants and biomanufacturing, and binder jetting is not utilized for tools, instruments and parts for medical devices. The most common materials are thermoplastics, photopolymers and metals such as titanium alloys. If standard terminology of AM would be followed, this would allow a more systematic review of the utilization of different AM processes. Current development in binder jetting would allow more possibilities in the future.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a workflow for 3D modeling and additive manufacturing (AM) of patient‐specific medical implants. The comprehensive workflow consists of four steps: medical imaging; 3D modelling; additive manufacturing; and clinical application. Implants are used to reconstruct bone damage or defects caused by trauma or disease. Traditionally, implants have been manually bent and shaped, either preoperatively or intraoperatively, with the help of anatomic solid models. The proposed workflow obviates the manual procedure and may result in more accurate and cost‐effective implants.Design/methodology/approach: A patient‐specific implant was digitally designed to reconstruct a facial bone defect. Several test pieces were additive manufactured from stainless steel and titanium by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technology. An additive manufactured titanium EOS Titanium Ti64 ELI reconstruction plate was successfully implanted onto the patient's injured orbital wall.Findings: This method enables exact fitting of implants to surrounding tissues. Creating implants before surgery improves accuracy, may reduce operation time and decrease patient morbidity, hence improving quality of surgery. By using AM methods it is possible to manufacture a volumetric net structure, which also allows cells and tissues to grow through it to and from surrounding tissues. The net is created from surface and its thickness and hole size are adjustable. The implant can be designed so that its mass is low and therefore sensitivity to hot and cold temperatures is reduced.Originality/value: The paper describes a novel technique to create patient‐specific reconstruction implants for facial bony defects.

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a digital process for manufacturing of occlusal splints. An alginate impression was taken from the upper and lower jaws of a patient with temporomandibular disorder owing to cross bite and wear of the teeth, and then digitized using a table laser scanner. The scanned model was repaired using the 3D ata E xpert software, and a splint was designed with the V iscam RP software. A splint was manufactured from a biocompatible liquid photopolymer by stereolithography. The system employed in the process was SLA 350. The splint was worn nightly for six months. The patient adapted to the splint well and found it comfortable to use. The splint relieved tension in the patient's bite muscles. No sign of tooth wear or significant splint wear was detected after six months of testing. Modern digital technology enables us to manufacture clinically functional occlusal splints, which might reduce costs, dental technician working time and chair-side time. Maximum-dimensional errors of approximately 1 mm were found at thin walls and sharp corners of the splint when compared with the digital model.