Agustín Abarca

Dr. Agustín Abarca


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaria Avramova
Maria Avramova
AAAgustín Abarca
Agustín Abarca
JHJason Hou
Jason Hou
KIKostadin Nikolov Ivanov
Kostadin Nikolov Ivanov
This paper provides a review of current and upcoming innovations in development, validation, and uncertainty quantification of nuclear reactor multi-physics simulation methods. Multi-physics modelling and simulations (M&S) provide more accurate and realistic predictions of the nuclear reactors behavior including local safety parameters. Multi-physics M&S tools can be subdivided in two groups: traditional multi-physics M&S on assembly/channel spatial scale (currently used in industry and regulation), and novel high-fidelity multi-physics M&S on pin (sub-pin)/sub-channel spatial scale. The current trends in reactor design and safety analysis are towards further development, verification, and validation of multi-physics multi-scale M&S combined with uncertainty quantification and propagation. Approaches currently applied for validation of the traditional multi-physics M&S are summarized and illustrated using established Nuclear Energy Agency/Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (NEA/OECD) multi-physics benchmarks. Novel high-fidelity multi-physics M&S allow for insights crucial to resolve industry challenge and high impact problems previously impossible with the traditional tools. Challenges in validation of novel multi-physics M&S are discussed along with the needs for developing validation benchmarks based on experimental data. Due to their complexity, the novel multi-physics codes are still computationally expensive for routine applications. This fact motivates the use of high-fidelity novel models and codes to inform the low-fidelity traditional models and codes, leading to improved traditional multi-physics M&S. The uncertainty quantification and propagation across different scales (multi-scale) and multi-physics phenomena are demonstrated using the OECD/NEA Light Water Reactor Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling benchmark framework. Finally, the increasing role of data science and analytics techniques in development and validation of multi-physics M&S is summarized.

19 July 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGregory Kyriakos Delipei
Gregory Kyriakos Delipei
PRPascal Rouxelin
Pascal Rouxelin
AAAgustín Abarca
Agustín Abarca
JHJason Hou
Jason Hou
MAMaria Avramova
Maria Avramova
KIKostadin Nikolov Ivanov
Kostadin Nikolov Ivanov
Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) approaches for nuclear reactor applications have been extensively developed in recent years. The challenge for BEPU approaches is to achieve multi-physics modeling with an acceptable computational cost while preserving a reasonable fidelity of the physics modeled. In this work, we present the core multi-physics computational framework developed for the efficient computation of uncertainties in Light Water Reactor (LWR) simulations. The subchannel thermal-hydraulic code CTF and the nodal expansion neutronic code PARCS are coupled for the multi-physics modeling (CTF-PARCS). The computational framework is discussed in detail from the Polaris lattice calculations up to the CTF-PARCS coupling approaches. Sampler is used to perturb the multi-group microscopic cross-sections, fission yields and manufacturing parameters, while Dakota is used to sample the CTF input parameters and the boundary conditions. Python scripts were developed to automatize and modularize both pre- and post-processing. The current state of the framework allows the consistent perturbation of inputs across neutronics and thermal-hydraulics modeling. Improvements to the standard thermal-hydraulics modeling for such coupling approaches have been implemented in CTF to allow the usage of 3D burnup distribution, calculation of the radial power and the burnup profile, and the usage of Santamarina effective Doppler temperature. The uncertainty quantification approach allows the treatment of both scalar and functional quantities and can estimate correlation between the multi-physics outputs of interest and up to the originally perturbed microscopic cross-sections and yields. The computational framework is applied to three exercises of the LWR Uncertainty Analysis in Modeling Phase III benchmark. The exercises cover steady-state, depletion and transient calculations. The results show that the maximum fuel centerline temperature across all exercises is 2474K with 1.7% uncertainty and that the most correlated inputs are the 238U inelastic and elastic cross-sections above 1 MeV.

1 July 2010 in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJosé Ródenas
José Ródenas
AAAgustín Abarca
Agustín Abarca
SGSergio Gallardo
Sergio Gallardo
ESEduardo Sollet
Eduardo Sollet

1 April 2010 in Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJosé Ródenas
José Ródenas
SGSergio Gallardo
Sergio Gallardo
AAAgustín Abarca
Agustín Abarca
VJVioleta Juan
Violeta Juan

1 April 2010 in Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJ. Ródenas
J. Ródenas
SGS. Gallardo
S. Gallardo
AAAgustín Abarca
Agustín Abarca
VJV. Juan
V. Juan

1 November 2011 in Progress in Nuclear Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMR. Miró
R. Miró
TBT. Barrachina
T. Barrachina
AAAgustín Abarca
Agustín Abarca
GVG. Verdú
G. Verdú
CPC. Pereira
C. Pereira
JMJ.C. Martínez-Murillo
J.C. Martínez-Murillo