Jaakko Hyvönen

Prof. Jaakko Hyvönen

1. Finnish Museum of Natural History (Botany), PO Box 7, 00014 Univ. Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Plant Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Peter PoczaiPeter Poczai
Peter Poczai
IVIldikó Varga
Ildikó Varga
MLMaarja Laos
Maarja Laos
Andras CsehAndras Cseh
Andras Cseh
NBNeil Bell
Neil Bell
JHJaakko Hyvönen
Jaakko Hyvönen
Public genomic databases have provided new directions for molecular marker development and initiated a shift in the types of PCR-based techniques commonly used in plant science. Alongside commonly used arbitrarily amplified DNA markers, other methods have been developed. Targeted fingerprinting marker techniques are based on the well-established practices of arbitrarily amplified DNA methods, but employ novel methodological innovations such as the incorporation of gene or promoter elements in the primers. These markers provide good reproducibility and increased resolution by the concurrent incidence of dominant and co-dominant bands. Despite their promising features, these semi-random markers suffer from possible problems of collision and non-homology analogous to those found with randomly generated fingerprints. Transposable elements, present in abundance in plant genomes, may also be used to generate fingerprints. These markers provide increased genomic coverage by utilizing specific targeted sites and produce bands that mostly seem to be homologous. The biggest drawback with most of these techniques is that prior genomic information about retrotransposons is needed for primer design, prohibiting universal applications. Another class of recently developed methods exploits length polymorphism present in arrays of multi-copy gene families such as cytochrome P450 and β-tubulin genes to provide cross-species amplification and transferability. A specific class of marker makes use of common features of plant resistance genes to generate bands linked to a given phenotype, or to reveal genetic diversity. Conserved DNA-based strategies have limited genome coverage and may fail to reveal genetic diversity, while resistance genes may be under specific evolutionary selection. Markers may also be generated from functional and/or transcribed regions of the genome using different gene-targeting approaches coupled with the use of RNA information. Such techniques have the potential to generate phenotypically linked functional markers, especially when fingerprints are generated from the transcribed or expressed region of the genome. It is to be expected that these recently developed techniques will generate larger datasets, but their shortcomings should also be acknowledged and carefully investigated.

24 June 2010 in Molecular Biology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPéter Poczai
Péter Poczai
JHJaakko Hyvönen
Jaakko Hyvönen

21 July 2009 in Molecular Biology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPéter Poczai
Péter Poczai
JHJaakko Hyvönen
Jaakko Hyvönen

22 January 2011 in Molecular Biology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPéter Poczai
Péter Poczai
JHJaakko Hyvönen
Jaakko Hyvönen
DSDavid E. Symon
David E. Symon

1 June 2004 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJaakko Hyvönen
Jaakko Hyvönen
SKSatu Koskinen
Satu Koskinen
GMGary L. Smith Merrill
Gary L. Smith Merrill
THTerry A. Hedderson
Terry A. Hedderson
SSSoili Stenroos
Soili Stenroos

1 January 2014 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNeil E Bell
Neil E Bell
JBJeffrey L Boore
Jeffrey L Boore
BMBrent Mishler
Brent Mishler
JHJaakko Hyvönen
Jaakko Hyvönen
Mosses are the largest of the three extant clades of gametophyte-dominant land plants and remain poorly studied using comparative genomic methods. Major monophyletic moss lineages are characterised by different types of a spore dehiscence apparatus called the peristome, and the most important unsolved problem in higher-level moss systematics is the branching order of these peristomate clades. Organellar genome sequencing offers the potential to resolve this issue through the provision of both genomic structural characters and a greatly increased quantity of nucleotide substitution characters, as well as to elucidate organellar evolution in mosses. We publish and describe the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of Tetraphis pellucida, representative of the most phylogenetically intractable and morphologically isolated peristomate lineage. Assembly of reads from Illumina SBS and Pacific Biosciences RS sequencing reveals that the Tetraphis chloroplast genome comprises 127,489 bp and the mitochondrial genome 107,730 bp. Although genomic structures are similar to those of the small number of other known moss organellar genomes, the chloroplast lacks the petN gene (in common with Tortula ruralis) and the mitochondrion has only a non-functional pseudogenised remnant of nad7 (uniquely amongst known moss chondromes). Structural genomic features exist with the potential to be informative for phylogenetic relationships amongst the peristomate moss lineages, and thus organellar genome sequences are urgently required for exemplars from other clades. The unique genomic and morphological features of Tetraphis confirm its importance for resolving one of the major questions in land plant phylogeny and for understanding the evolution of the peristome, a likely key innovation underlying the diversity of mosses. The functional loss of nad7 from the chondrome is now shown to have occurred independently in all three bryophyte clades as well as in the early-diverging tracheophyte Huperzia squarrosa.