The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted rapid investigation and deployment of vaccine platforms never before used to combat human disease. The severe impact on the health system and the high economic cost of non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as lockdowns and international border closures employed to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 prior to the arrival of effective vaccines, have led to calls for development and deployment of novel vaccine technologies as part of a “100-day response ambition” for the next pandemic. Prior to COVID-19, all of the pandemics (excluding HIV) in the past century have been due to influenza viruses, and influenza remains one of the most likely future pandemic threats along with new coronaviruses. New and emerging vaccine platforms are likely to play an important role in combatting the next pandemic. However, the existing well-established, proven platforms for seasonal and pandemic influenza manufacturing will also continue to be utilized to rapidly address the next influenza threat. The field of influenza vaccine manufacturing has a long history of successes, including approval of vaccines within approximately 100 days after WHO declaration of the A(H1N1) 2009 influenza pandemic. Moreover, many advances in vaccine science and manufacturing capabilities have been made in the past decade to optimize a rapid and timely response should a new influenza pandemic threat emerge.

This commentary provides an overview of the development of a zoonotic influenza vaccine, in response to the emergence of an H5N1 subtype virus from clade 2.3.4.4b in mid-2020. When development was initiated, the World Health Organization (WHO) had recommended four candidate vaccine viruses; the A/Astrakhan/3212/2020-like strain was selected as it provided good coverage of circulating viruses and, critically, was available. To facilitate regulatory approval, the licence of an existing zoonotic vaccine, Aflunov (A/turkey/Turkey/01/2005)—a pre-pandemic monovalent A/H5N1 adjuvanted with MF59 and manufactured using the egg-based platform—was duplicated, with the plan to submit a variation to the duplicate licence for the strain update. This was supported by a ferret immunogenicity study using pseudoviruses (allowing the work to be conducted at a lower biosafety level), in conjunction with clinical data from the original Aflunov licence application, and a US study (NCT05874713) on another candidate zoonotic vaccine manufactured using the cell-based platform. Qualification batches for characterisation studies were manufactured at-risk, until calibrated, homologous reagents were available, and the final product release and stability studies were conducted, with rolling provision of stability data to health authorities. The vaccine was initially approved with a shorter shelf-life, allowing early distribution in certain countries, with later extension of the shelf-life once data became available. In terms of procurement and logistics, early consultation between the European Commission and EU member states resulted in the award of a Framework Contract for the initial supply of 665,000 doses to 15 states. Learnings from the development of this vaccine may help to improve pandemic readiness in the future.