Maize is one of the most widely grown cereals in the world. However, to address the challenges in maize breeding arising from climatic anomalies, there is a need for developing novel strategies to harness the power of multi-omics technologies. In this regard, pleiotropy is an important genetic phenomenon that can be utilized to simultaneously enhance multiple agronomic phenotypes in maize. In addition to pleiotropy, another aspect is the consideration of the regulatory SNPs (rSNPs) that are likely to have causal effects in phenotypic development. By incorporating both aspects in our study, we performed a systematic analysis based on multi-omics data to reveal the novel pleiotropic signatures of rSNPs in a global maize population. For this purpose, we first applied Random Forests and then Markov clustering algorithms to decipher the pleiotropic signatures of rSNPs, based on which hierarchical network models are constructed to elucidate the complex interplay among transcription factors, rSNPs, and phenotypes. The results obtained in our study could help to understand the genetic programs orchestrating multiple phenotypes and thus could provide novel breeding targets for the simultaneous improvement of several agronomic traits.

The NFDI-consortium FAIRagro has established a systematic framework for evaluating the FAIRness of Research Data Infrastructures (RDI) within the German agrosystem research landscape. While FAIR principles are widely accepted, their practical implementation by RDIs remains challenging. By operationalizing the FAIR principles into a reproducible multi-dimensional scoring methodology, this initiative addresses the critical need for a transparent and citable benchmark of RDIs that moves beyond simple compliance. This paper details the underlying assessment criteria, comprising 20 core metrics, the iterative community-driven validation process, and the integration of these metrics into the FAIRagro Search Hub. This framework evaluates RDIs, like repositories or databases, instead of sampling hosted data sets, across the four distinct categories of FAIR independently, yielding granular, pillar-specific ratings. Unlike aggregate scoring models, which can inadvertently mask technical deficiencies by averaging performance across categories, this multi-dimensional approach ensures that a repository’s distinct strengths and bottlenecks remain fully visible. Our findings demonstrate that standardized scoring not only clarifies data accessibility for users but also highlights specific operational gaps, allowing repository providers to identify precisely where the service implementation can be enhanced. By establishing this data-driven service in the agronomy domain, we provide a scalable template for the broader NFDI and EOSC ecosystems to foster a culture of excellence in research data stewardship.