Asma Aziz

Asma Aziz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2021 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SASabeena Ahmed
Sabeena Ahmed
MKMohammad Mahbubul Karim
Mohammad Mahbubul Karim
ARAllen G. Ross
Allen G. Ross
MHMohammad Sharif Hossain
Mohammad Sharif Hossain
JCJohn D. Clemens
John D. Clemens
WKWasif Ali Khan
Wasif Ali Khan
• Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic agent, was found to be an inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 replication in the laboratory. • Ivermectin may be effective for the treatment of early-onset mild COVID-19 in adult patients. • Early viral clearance of SARS-CoV-2 was observed in ivermectin treated patients. • Remission of fever, cough and sore throat did not differ among treatment groups. No severe adverse event was observed. • Larger trials will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

1 May 2018 in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCarine Claeys
Carine Claeys
KZKhalequ Zaman
Khalequ Zaman
Ghassan DbaiboGhassan Dbaibo
Ghassan Dbaibo
PLPing Li
Ping Li
AIAllen Izu
Allen Izu
MWMarie Wheeler
Marie Wheeler

10 January 2020 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KZK Zaman
K Zaman
SDSusanne Gjeruldsen Dudman
Susanne Gjeruldsen Dudman
KSKathrine Stene-Johansen
Kathrine Stene-Johansen
FQFirdausi Qadri
Firdausi Qadri
YUYunus
Yunus
JCJohn D Clemens
John D Clemens
Introduction Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a leading cause of acute viral hepatitis in the developing world and is a public health problem, in particular among pregnant women, where it may lead to severe or fatal complications. A recombinant HEV vaccine, 239 (Hecolin; Xiamen Innovax Biotech, Xiamen, China), is licensed in China, but WHO calls for further studies to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine in vulnerable populations, and to evaluate protection in pregnancy. We are therefore conducting a phase IV trial to assess the effectiveness, safety and immunogenicity of the HEV 239 vaccine when given in women of childbearing age in rural Bangladesh, where HEV infection is endemic. Methods and analysis Enrolment of a target of approximately 20 000 non-pregnant women, aged 16–39 years, started on 2 October 2017 in Matlab, Bangladesh. Sixty-seven villages were randomised by village at a 1:1 ratio to receive either the HEV vaccine or the control vaccine (hepatitis B vaccine). A 3-dose vaccination series at 0, 1 and 6 months is ongoing, and women are followed up for 24 months. The primary outcome is confirmed HEV disease among pregnant women. After vaccination, participants are requested to report information about clinical hepatitis symptoms. Participants who become pregnant are visited at their homes every 2 weeks to collect information about pregnancy outcome and to screen for clinical hepatitis. All suspected hepatitis cases undergo laboratory testing for diagnostic evaluation. The incidence of confirmed HEV disease among pregnant and non-pregnant women will be compared between the HEV vaccinated and control groups, safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine will also be evaluated. Ethics and dissemination The protocol was reviewed and approved by the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Research Review Committee and Ethical Review Committee, and the Directorate General of Drug Administration in Bangladesh, and by the Regional Ethics Committee in Norway. This article is based on the protocol version 2.2 dated 29 June 2017. We will present the results through peer-reviewed publications and at international conferences. Trial registration number The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the registry name “Effectiveness Trial to Evaluate Protection of Pregnant Women by Hepatitis E Vaccine in Bangladesh” and the identifier NCT02759991.

1 December 2020 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAsma Aziz
Asma Aziz
Rubhana RaqibRubhana Raqib
Rubhana Raqib
WKWasif A. Khan
Wasif A. Khan
MRMd Mahbubur Rahman
Md Mahbubur Rahman
RHRashidul Haque
Rashidul Haque
Allen G. P. RossAllen G. P. Ross
Allen G. P. Ross
Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face many challenges in controlling COVID-19. Healthcare resources are limited and so are ICU beds. RT-PCR testing is conducted on a limited scale and treatment options are few. There is no vaccine. Therefore, what low-cost solutions remain for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of SARS-CoV-2? How should these essential health services be delivered in order to reach the most vulnerable in our societies? In this editorial we discuss several important strategies for controlling COVID-19 including: vaccination, molecular and serological diagnostics, hygiene and WaSH interventions, and low-cost therapeutics. We also discuss the delivery of such services in order to reach the most in need. The proposed integrated control strategy requires immediate action and political will in order to reduce the widening health inequalities caused by the pandemic.

12 April 2022 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBirkneh Tilahun Tadesse
Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse
FKFarhana Khanam
Farhana Khanam
FAFaisal Ahmmed
Faisal Ahmmed
JIJustin Im
Justin Im
TITaufiqul Islam
Taufiqul Islam
JCJohn D Clemens
John D Clemens
Typhoid fever contributes to approximately 135 000 deaths annually. Achievable improvements in household water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) combined with vaccination using typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCVs) may be an effective preventive strategy. However, little is known about how improved WASH and vaccination interact to lower the risk of typhoid. A total of 61 654 urban Bangladeshi children aged 9 months to <16 years, residing in 150 clusters with a baseline population of 205 760 residents, were randomized 1:1 by cluster to Vi-tetanus toxoid TCV or Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine. Surveillance for blood culture–confirmed typhoid fever was conducted over 2 years. Existing household WASH status was assessed at baseline as Better or Not Better using previously validated criteria. The reduction in typhoid risk among all residents associated with living in TCV clusters, Better WASH households, or both was evaluated using mixed-effects Poisson regression models. The adjusted reduced risk of typhoid among all residents living in the clusters assigned to TCV was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43%–65%; P < .001), and that of living in Better WASH households, regardless of cluster, was 37% (95% CI, 24%–48%; P < .001). The highest risk of typhoid was observed in persons living in households with Not Better WASH in the JE clusters. In comparison with these persons, those living in households with Better WASH in the TCV clusters had an adjusted reduced risk of 71% (95% CI, 59%–80%; P < .001). Implementation of TCV programs combined with achievable and culturally acceptable household WASH practices were independently associated with a significant reduction in typhoid risk. ISRCTN11643110.

24 December 2021 in eClinicalMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJohn Clemens
John Clemens
AAAsma Aziz
Asma Aziz
BTBirkneh Tilahun Tadesse
Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse
SKSophie Kang
Sophie Kang
FMFlorian Marks
Florian Marks
JKJerome Kim
Jerome Kim
The availability and use of vaccines for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in low and middle-income countries (L/MICs) lags far behind more affluent countries, and vaccines currently used in L/MICs are predominantly of lower efficacy. As vaccines continue to be rolled out in L/MICs, successful control of COVID-19 by vaccines requires monitoring both of vaccine protection of vaccinees (effectiveness) and of the entire targeted populations, including vaccine herd protection of non-vaccinees (impact). To be of greatest relevance to L/MICs, there is the need to address the distinctive medical and demographic features of populations, health systems, and demography that may greatly affect vaccine performance in these settings. We identified 58 published studies that included 85 evaluations of the effectiveness of different COVID-19 vaccines globally. Only three were done in L/MICs, and no impact studies were identified in these settings. Post-deployment studies of the protection by COVID-19 vaccines rolled out in L/MICs constitute an important but currently neglected global priority.