For software quality assurance, many safety-critical industries appeal to the use of dynamic testing and structural coverage criteria. However, there are reasons to doubt the adequacy of such practices. Mutation testing has been suggested as an alternative or complementary approach but its cost has traditionally hindered its adoption by industry, and there are limited studies applying it to real safety-critical code. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of state-of-the-art mutation testing on safety-critical code from within the U.K. nuclear industry, in terms of revealing flaws in test suites that already meet the structural coverage criteria recommended by relevant safety standards. It also assesses the practical feasibility of implementing such mutation testing in a real setting. We applied a conventional selective mutation approach to a C codebase supplied by a nuclear industry partner and measured the mutation score achieved by the existing test suite. We repeated the experiment using trivial compiler equivalence (TCE) to assess the benefit that it might provide. Using a conventional approach, it first appeared that the existing test suite only killed 82% of the mutants, but applying TCE revealed that it killed 92%. The difference was due to equivalent or duplicate mutants that TCE eliminated. We then added new tests to kill all the surviving mutants, increasing the test suite size by 18% in the process. In conclusion, mutation testing can potentially improve fault detection compared to structural-coverage-guided testing, and may be affordable in a nuclear industry context. The industry feedback on our results was positive, although further evidence is needed from application of mutation testing to software with known real faults.

Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UW-ASNs) are predominantly used for underwater environments and find applications in many areas. However, a lack of security considerations, the unstable and challenging nature of the underwater environment, and the resource-constrained nature of the sensor nodes used for UW-ASNs (which makes them incapable of adopting security primitives) make the UW-ASN prone to vulnerabilities. This paper proposes an Adaptive decentralised Intrusion Detection and Prevention System called AIDPS for UW-ASNs. The proposed AIDPS can improve the security of the UW-ASNs so that they can efficiently detect underwater-related attacks (e.g., blackhole, grayhole and flooding attacks). To determine the most effective configuration of the proposed construction, we conduct a number of experiments using several state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms (e.g., Adaptive Random Forest (ARF), light gradient-boosting machine, and K-nearest neighbours) and concept drift detection algorithms (e.g., ADWIN, kdqTree, and Page-Hinkley). Our experimental results show that incremental ARF using ADWIN provides optimal performance when implemented with One-class support vector machine (SVM) anomaly-based detectors. Furthermore, our extensive evaluation results also show that the proposed scheme outperforms state-of-the-art bench-marking methods while providing a wider range of desirable features such as scalability and complexity.

Malware detection is a major security concern and has been the subject of a great deal of research and development. Machine learning is a natural technology for addressing malware detection, and many researchers have investigated its use. However, the performance of machine learning algorithms often depends significantly on parametric choices, so the question arises as to what parameter choices are optimal. In this paper, we investigate how best to tune the parameters of machine learning algorithms—a process generally known as hyper-parameter optimisation—in the context of malware detection. We examine the effects of some simple (model-free) ways of parameter tuning together with a state-of-the-art Bayesian model-building approach. Our work is carried out using Ember, a major published malware benchmark dataset of Windows Portable Execution metadata samples, and a smaller dataset from kaggle.com (also comprising Windows Portable Execution metadata). We demonstrate that optimal parameter choices may differ significantly from default choices and argue that hyper-parameter optimisation should be adopted as a ‘formal outer loop’ in the research and development of malware detection systems. We also argue that doing so is essential for the development of the discipline since it facilitates a fair comparison of competing machine learning algorithms applied to the malware detection problem.