william h battye

Dr. william h battye

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 September 2017 in Earth's Future
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WBwilliam h battye
william h battye
Viney AnejaViney Aneja
Viney Aneja
WSWilliam H. Schlesinger
William H. Schlesinger
Key Points: The rapid growth of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen production now makes it unquestionably dominant relative to the total of natural sources Anthropogenic production of reactive nitrogen has increased almost five‐fold in the last 60 years. This anthropogenic activity is a massive perturbation of a global geochemical cycle in a relatively short period of time.

1 December 2019 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBCasey Bray
Casey Bray
WBwilliam h battye
william h battye
VAViney P. Aneja
Viney P. Aneja

8 February 2020 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Viney AnejaViney Aneja
Viney Aneja
WSWilliam H. Schlesinger
William H. Schlesinger
QLQi Li
Qi Li
ANAlberth Nahas
Alberth Nahas
WBwilliam h battye
william h battye
Global ammonia (NH3) emissions to the atmosphere are projected to increase in the coming years with the increased use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers and cultivation of nitrogen‐fixing crops. A statistical model (NH3_STAT) is developed for characterizing atmospheric NH3 emissions from agricultural soils and compared to the performance of other global and regional NH3 models (e.g., Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research, Magnitude and Seasonality of Agricultural Emissions, MIX, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). The statistical model was developed from a multiple linear regression between NH3 emission and the physicochemical variables. The model was evaluated for 2012 NH3 emissions. The results indicate that, in comparison to other data sets, the model provides a lower global NH3 estimate by 58%, (NH3_STAT: 13.9 Tg N yr−1; Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research: 33.0 Tg N yr−1). We also performed a region‐based analysis (United States, India, and China) using the NH3_STAT model. For the United States, our model produces an estimate that is a ~1.4 times higher in comparison to the Environmental Protection Agency. Meanwhile, the NH3_STAT estimate for India shows NH3 emissions between 0.8 and 1.4 times lower when compared to other data sets. A lower estimate is also seen for China, where the model estimates NH3 emissions 0.4 to 5 times lower than other data sets. The difference in the global estimates is attributed to the lower estimates in major agricultural countries like China and India. The statistical model captures the spatial distribution of global NH3 emissions by utilizing a simplified approach compared to other readily available data sets. Moreover, the NH3_STAT model provides an opportunity to predict future NH3 emissions in a changing world.

23 September 2017 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCasey Bray
Casey Bray
WBwilliam h battye
william h battye
PUPornpan Uttamang
Pornpan Uttamang
PPPriya Pillai
Priya Pillai
Viney AnejaViney Aneja
Viney Aneja
Ambient concentrations of both fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 micron (PM10) were measured from 10 June 2015 to 13 July 2015 at three locations surrounding the Cheswick Power Plant, which is located between the boroughs of Springdale and Cheswick, Pennsylvania. The average concentrations of PM10 observed during the periods were 20.5 ± 10.2 μg m−3 (Station 1), 16.1 ± 4.9 μg m−3 (Station 2) and 16.5 ± 7.1 μg m−3 (Station 3). The average concentrations of PM2.5 observed at the stations were 9.1 ± 5.1 μg m−3 (Station 1), 0.2 ± 0.4 μg m−3 (Station 2) and 11.6 ± 4.8 μg m−3 (Station 3). In addition, concentrations of PM2.5 measured by four Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection air quality monitors (all within a radius of 40 miles) were also analyzed. The observed average concentrations at these sites were 12.7 ± 6.9 μg m−3 (Beaver Falls), 11.2 ± 4.7 μg m−3 (Florence), 12.2 ± 5.3 μg m−3 (Greensburg) and 12.2 ± 5.5 μg m−3 (Washington). Elemental analysis for samples (blank – corrected) revealed the presence of metals that are present in coal (i.e., antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel and selenium).

17 May 2022 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RWRebecca Wiegand
Rebecca Wiegand
WBwilliam h battye
william h battye
CBCasey Bray
Casey Bray
Viney AnejaViney Aneja
Viney Aneja
Intensive animal agriculture is an important part of the US and North Carolina’s (NC’s) economy. Large emissions of ammonia (NH3) gas emanate from the handling of animal wastes at these operations contributing to the formation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) around the state causing a variety of human health and environmental effects. The objective of this research is to provide the relationship between ammonia, aerosol optical depth and meteorology and its effect on PM2.5 concentrations using satellite observations (column ammonia and aerosol optical depth (AOD)) and ground-based meteorological observations. An observational-based multiple linear regression model was derived to predict ground-level PM2.5 during the summer months (JJA) from 2008–2017 in New Hanover County, Catawba County and Sampson County. A combination of the Cumberland and Johnston County models for the summer was chosen and validated for Duplin County, NC, then used to predict Sampson County, NC, PM2.5 concentrations. The model predicted a total of six 24 h exceedances over the nine-year period. This indicates that there are rural areas of the state that may have air quality issues that are not captured for a lack of measurements. Moreover, PM2.5 chemical composition analysis suggests that ammonium is a major component of the PM2.5 aerosol.

27 July 2019 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WBwilliam h battye
william h battye
CBCasey Bray
Casey Bray
Viney AnejaViney Aneja
Viney Aneja
QTQuansong Tong
Quansong Tong
Pius LeePius Lee
Pius Lee
YTYouhua Tang
Youhua Tang