In a global context, where the construction industry is a major source of CO₂ emissions and resource use, is dependent on concrete and its risks, and lags behind in digitalization, a clear need arises to direct architecture towards more practical, efficient, and sustainable practices. This research introduces an alternative technique for building timber space structures, aiming to expand its applications in areas with limited access to advanced technologies such as CNCs with more than five axes and industrial robotic arms. This involves reconfiguring economic and ecological constraints to maximize the structural and architectural advantages of these systems. The method develops a parametric tool that integrates computational design and manufacturing based on two-axis laser cutting for shells with segmented hexagonal plywood plates. It uses a modified ‘half-lap joint’ mechanical joint, also made of plywood and without additional fasteners, ensuring a precise and robust connection. The results demonstrate the compatibility of the geometry with two-axis CNC machines, which simplifies manufacturing and reduces the cuts required, thus increasing economic efficiency. The prototype, with a span of 1.5 m and composed of 63 plywood panels and 163 connectors, each 6 mm thick, supported a point load of 0.8 kN with a maximum displacement of 5 mm, weighing 15.1 kg. Assembly and disassembly, carried out by two students, took 5 h and 1.45 h, respectively, highlighting the practicality and accessibility of the method. In conclusion, the technique for building timber shells based on two-axis CNC is feasible and effective, proven by practical experimentation and finite element analysis.

This qualitative systematic review evaluates the potential of modular prefabricated OSB/plywood housing systems in low-technification, high-seismicity settings. These systems are promoted as low-carbon options for emerging contexts, and we assess how far the evidence supports that promise and under which conditions they can contribute to net-zero housing pathways. An adapted PRISMA 2020 workflow was applied to Scopus (TITLE-ABS, 2000–2025); 153 studies were synthesized in a table-first, coded matrix into axes for structural, digital fabrication, sustainability/circularity, and extrapolatable systems—supplemented by curated housing cases—with other EWPs used only for contrast. To address fragmentation and heterogeneity across domains, we developed a domain-based QA/QC instrument (STRUCTURAL, LCA, and FABRICATION) to judge whether studies provide minimally comparable evidence. Structural performance is relatively mature for certain patterns (calibrated FEM, cyclic tests, some 1:1 trials), whereas digital fabrication and LCA evidence remain partial: file-to-factory workflows rarely report verifiable QA/QC traceability, and most LCAs stop at A1–A3 with uneven treatment of A4, C/D, and biogenic carbon. Full convergence of adequate STRUCTURAL, LCA, and FABRICATION evidence within the same system type is rare, so both transferability to low-technification, seismic-prone settings and alignment with net-zero objectives must be characterized as conditional rather than established. The review identifies minimum multi-domain thresholds—technical robustness, whole-life LCA coverage, and verifiable QA/QC—as prerequisites for positioning modular OSB/plywood housing as a credible low-carbon pathway. These conclusions are limited by Scopus-only, English-language coverage and methodological heterogeneity, especially in the LCA.