Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in approximately 50% of invasive breast carcinomas and it is correlated with hormone resistance and poor prognosis. EGFR suppression by gefitinib, a quinazoline derivative that inhibits phosphorylation of the specific receptor, represents a novel therapeutic strategy. A dose-finding study was performed to evaluate the combination of gefitinib with weekly epirubicin in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Fifteen patients were enrolled at four sequential dose levels. Gefitinib was administered orally, at the fixed daily dose of 250 mg. The starting dose of epirubicin was 20 mg/m². Escalating dose levels of epirubicin were planned by increments of 5 mg/m² per level, up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacodynamic studies were performed by determining serum and tissue ERBB2 and EGFR. Results: At the first three dose levels tested no patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). In cohort 4, two patients experienced DLTs (grade 4 dyspnea and asthenia, grade 3 diarrhea and thrombocytopenia) identifying the MTD of epirubicin as 35 mg/m². Of the 14 cases assessable for response, partial response was documented in two patients, and stable disease in seven, giving an overall disease control rate of 64.2%. The comparison of pre- and post-therapy ERBB2 and EGFR values was not statistically significant between the subgroups of patients regarding responsiveness to treatment. Conclusions: The recommended dose of epirubicin for phase II studies is 30 mg/m² in combination with gefitinib at the daily dose of 250 mg. Pharmacodynamic studies did not identify any biomarker predictive of response.

Many effective physical activity (PA) interventions have focused on individual factors or a single theoretical model, limiting our understanding of the determinants of PA practice and their interactions in the cancer trajectory. The present mixed-method study aims to capture social and psychological determinants of PA practice from diagnosis to remission among cancer patients, and to identify key levers for PA practice. A nested sequential mixed-method design QUAN (QUAL+QUAL) will be used, with qualitative studies embedded in the quantitative study to broaden our understanding of the determinants of PA practice. The design is sequential, since qualitative data on medical staff will be collected before patient inclusion (Phase 1), followed by quantitative patient data collection lasting one year (Phase 2) and a final qualitative data collection one year after inclusion (Phase 3). Phase 1 will be a case study in the two hospitals involved in the study, exploring knowledge of and support for PA practice among medical staff. Through interviews and documental analyses, the PA support dynamic will be evaluated with regard to PA prescription. Phase 2 will be a one-year observational study among 693 cancer patients. Quantitative medical, social, dispositional and psychological data, PA practices and preferences, will be collected at diagnosis, and six months and one year thereafter. Phase 3 will be a retrospective study, evaluating societal and policy factors, as well as unexpected factors playing a role in PA levels and preferences among cancer patients. For this phase thirty patients will be identified six months after inclusion on the basis of their PA profiles. Quantitative data will provide the main dataset, whilst qualitative data will complete the picture, enabling determinants of PA practice and their interactions to be captured throughout the cancer trajectory. The present study aims to identify key levers and typical trajectories for PA practice among cancer patients, adapted to different times in the course of cancer and taking into account “what works”, “for whom”, “where” and “how”. The challenge is the tailoring of PA interventions to patients at different times in their cancer trajectory, and the implication of medical staff support. Clinical Trial NCT03919149 , 18 April 2019. Prospectively registered.

BACKGROUND:Breast metastasis (BM) is extremely rare. Ovarian cancer accounts for approximately 0.03% to 0.6% of all BMs. BM diagnosis is challenging and the prognosis very poor. The treatment is multidisciplinary and strictly related to multiple clinical and biological factors. CASE REPORT:A 70-year-old non-smoking Caucasian woman was hospitalized for a 4-month history of abdominal pain, anorexia, and weight loss of 10 kg. During the clinical examination, we found multiple axillary lymph nodes and a painless tumor lesion in the superior internal quadrant of the right breast. Whole body CT-scan and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET scan documented a right ovarian tumor associated with multiple metastases, a hypermetabolic lesion of the right breast, and multiple axillary lymphadenopathies that were confirmed by breast ultrasonography. The percutaneous biopsy of both the right axillary lymph node and breast tumor showed a metastasis from a high-grade serous papillary ovarian adenocarcinoma. Considering the tumor aggressiveness and the lack of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, we started systemic chemotherapy with a 3-week carboplatin/paclitaxel regimen combined with bevacizumab, which quickly improved the patient’s symptoms and induced a biological tumor response. CONCLUSIONS:This case reports a synchronous breast metastasis from an ovarian cancer and highlights this uncommon entity, which is very difficult to diagnose and treat. A differential diagnosis from a primary breast cancer should be considered as the treatment and prognosis of these 2 tumors are different.

Background: Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE) is a rare autoimmune neurological syndrome observed in cancer patients. PLE is difficult to diagnose and presents a variable response to treatment, depending on the characteristics of the tumor and neuronal autoantibodies. Case presentation: A 64-year-old, Caucasian, non-smoker man presented with a rapidly developing cognitive impairment, personality change, spatial disorientation, and short-term memory loss associated with anorexia and cervical and inguinal lymph nodes. The ¹⁸F-FDG PET scan documented intensely hypermetabolic lymph nodes, which histologically corresponded to a metastasis from a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The brain MRI revealed a high T2-weighted FLAIR signal of the hippocamps, consisted with a PLE. The presence of anti-neuronal Hu antibodies confirmed the diagnosis. The patient underwent plasmapheresis, associated to a systemic chemotherapy resulting in a partial and temporary improvement of the neurological symptoms. Four cycles of intravenous immunoglobulins were also necessary. After six cures of chemotherapy, the lymph node metastases regressed. However, a new anorectal lesion was detected and was histologically confirmed as a primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, which was treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. At the end of this treatment, the patient showed a rapid tumor progression leading to his death. Conclusions: This case highlights the rare entity, PLE, which is difficult to diagnose and manage. In addition, this is the first published case of PLE associated with an anorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, which appeared after completion of systemic chemotherapy.

Unusual clinical course Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common tumor in women. Abnormal uterine bleeding is the leading symptom in 90% of cases. The more frequent metastatic sites include lymph nodes, omentum, lungs, and liver. Bone metastasis has been reported to occur in 2–6% of all metastatic endometrial cancers, particularly in high surgical stage and grade, the most common involved site being the spine and hip. We report here the case of a 62-year-old white woman hospitalized for a painful swelling in the left foot, which appeared from January 2014, postmenopausal bleeding, and a progressive weight loss in the last year. An endometrioid, endometrial cancer was diagnosed by hysteroscopy, associated with a solitary bone metastasis of the left metatarsus, histologically confirmed by biopsy. The patient refused any surgical procedure. She received a single-fraction of 800 cGy radiotherapy to the left foot, leading to optimal analgesic control. Subsequently, systemic chemotherapy was started using a carboplatin/paclitaxel-containing regimen with IV zoledronic acid. This treatment is ongoing. There is no standard treatment for endometrial cancer bone metastasis. The prognosis of these patients is poor, with a median survival of about 12–17 months. The treatment is predominantly palliative and relies on several factors, including patient clinical conditions, site and number of bone metastases, and the presence of any additional visceral lesions. An aggressive multimodal treatment should be proposed to very select patients presenting better prognostic factors. In our case, a solitary fifth metatarsal bone metastasis, histologically proved, was shown as initial presentation of an EC. Endometrial cancer can present as initial bone diffusion, even in atypical locations such as acrometastasis and it should be considered when bone metastases are diagnosed.