Cynthia J. Jameson

Prof. Cynthia J. Jameson

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

57Years (1970-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1987 in Chemical Physics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJA.Keith Jameson
A.Keith Jameson
CJCynthia J. Jameson
Cynthia J. Jameson

15 September 1970 in The Journal of Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AJA. Keith Jameson
A. Keith Jameson
CJCynthia J. Jameson
Cynthia J. Jameson
HGH. S. Gutowsky
H. S. Gutowsky
Unlike other chemical shifts in gaseous systems which have been found to have strictly linear dependence on density, we have found the 129Xe chemical shift in pure xenon gas to have a quadratic and cubic dependence in addition to the dominant linear dependence on density. This implies the importance of three or more body interactions in xenon. In mixtures of xenon with another gas (Ar, Kr, CO2, HCl, CH4, CH3F, CH2F2, CHF3, CF4), the dependence of the 129Xe chemical shift on the density of the other gas is found to be linear within experimental error, and varying from 2300–11 700 ppm/mol cc−1. These shifts are orders of magnitude greater than the reported H and F shifts in gases. Analysis of the results show that the density dependence cannot adequately be reproduced by the contributions, Σ1 = Σb − B〈ε2〉 − B〈F2〉 , which had been adequate for H and F shifts. The general formulation for calculation of the A and B parameters, the coefficients of the linear and quadratic electric field terms in the theory of chemical shift in gases, is developed. An approximate calculation of B for atoms is given, and the repulsive and anisotropic contributions are estimated. The sensitivity of the chemical shift to the form of the intermolecular potential is suggested in the case of Xe and the fluoromethanes where the results are consistent with a noncentral field potential but not with a central field potential like the Lennard‐Jones.

1 November 1991 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CJCynthia J. Jameson
Cynthia J. Jameson

1 April 1990 in Chemical Physics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CJCynthia J. Jameson
Cynthia J. Jameson
ADAngel De Dios
Angel De Dios
AJA. Keith Jameson
A. Keith Jameson

1 January 1981 in The Journal of Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CJCynthia J. Jameson
Cynthia J. Jameson
AJA. Keith Jameson
A. Keith Jameson
DOD. Oppusunggu
D. Oppusunggu
SWS. Wille
S. Wille
PBPatricia M. Burrell
Patricia M. Burrell
JMJoan Mason
Joan Mason
We have measured the 15N nuclear magnetic resonance frequencies in 15N-labeled molecules (NNO, NNO, NH3, N2, and HCN) in gas phase samples and also in CH3NO2 as neat liquid. By using the previously determined temperature dependence of samples of the these gases at various densities, we are able to reduce the measured frequencies to the zero-density limit at 300 K, and obtain shielding differences between rovibrationally averaged isolated molecules at this shielding measurements from molecular beam studies to provide an 15N absolute shielding scale based on 15NH3.

15 October 1973 in The Journal of Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CJCynthia J. Jameson
Cynthia J. Jameson
AJA. Keith Jameson
A. Keith Jameson
SCSheila M. Cohen
Sheila M. Cohen
Studies of density dependence of 129Xe chemical shift in xenon gas at room temperature have shown that while the chemical shielding does have quadratic and cubic dependence on density over densities up to 250 amagat, σ(ρ, T) = σ0 + σ1(T)ρ + σ2(T)ρ2 + σ3(T)ρ3, the curve is essentially linear up to about 100 amagat. We have now obtained σ1(T), the linear density coefficient of chemical shielding, for pure xenon over the temperature range 240–440 °K. The experimental values of σ1(T) can be fitted by a fourth degree polynomial: σ1(τ) = 0.536 − 0.135 × 10−2τ + 0.132 × 10−4 τ2 − 0.598 × 10−7τ3 + 0.663 × 10−10τ4 (ppm/amagat), where τ = T − 300 °K. Comparison is made with σ1(T) for other nuclei and with σ1(T) predicted by various theoretical models.