Ruth Rama

Prof. Dr. Ruth Rama


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 April 2023 in Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAdelheid Holl
Adelheid Holl
RRRuth Rama
Ruth Rama
Digital transformation plays an increasingly important role in the growth and competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), yet little is known regarding spatial inequalities in their adoption of advanced digital technologies. Using recent data from the Flash Eurobarometer 486, we study the spatial patterns of drivers for the implementation of new digital technologies in SMEs in Europe. In our analysis, the focus is on the possible influence of location. Considerable heterogeneity of SMEs is found in their propensity to adopt advanced digital technologies related to the strength of the local business environment and to the urban/rural hierarchy.Plain English Summary: European SMEs and Digitalisation: The adoption of digital technologies favours the competitiveness, resilience, and internationalisation of firms, but SMEs, which form the backbone of the EU economy, are lagging behind. A recent survey reveals that location greatly influences the probability that European SMEs adopt digital technology. Rural and small-town SMEs are less likely to be adopters, even when country, sector, and firm-specific characteristics are taken into account. However, good business environments always encourage the adoption of digitalisation technologies, whatever the geographic location of an SME. Innovators tend to be adopters, especially when they employ green innovation or management innovation. Larger SMEs, companies that are part of a business group, grow more rapidly, and/or export, are all more likely to adopt digital technologies. Policy-makers need to contemplate the urban/rural-divide and promote strong business environments in all types of locations. Public encouragement towards innovation is likely to indirectly promote easier access to digital technologies.


1 July 2009 in Research Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FFFragkiskos Filippaios
Fragkiskos Filippaios
MPMarina Papanastassiou
Marina Papanastassiou
RPRobert Pearce
Robert Pearce
RRRuth Rama
Ruth Rama

1 June 2002 in Agribusiness
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OAOscar Alfranca
Oscar Alfranca
RRRuth Rama
Ruth Rama
NTNicholas von Tunzelmann
Nicholas von Tunzelmann

1 February 2003 in Regional Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRuth Rama
Ruth Rama
DFDeron Ferguson
Deron Ferguson
AMAna Melero
Ana Melero
RAMA R., FERGUSON D. and MELERO A. (2003) Subcontracting networks in industrial districts: the electronics industries of Madrid , Reg. Studies 37 , 71- 88. With the recent introduction of industrial district typologies, the definition of "industrial district' has been extended beyond the classical "flexibly specialized' districts popularized in Italian case studies to include "hub- and-spoke' districts, technology districts and others. Few studies compare lesser known or emerging districts to these models. One difficult issue in the comparison of industrial districts has involved the insufficient identification and inconsistent measurement of interfirm connectedness and "networks'. In this paper, we propose that production subcontracting is a consistent yet relatively unexplored empirical measure of intradistrict connectedness, and that it varies uniformly in its nature and scope across district types. We present a model relating different types of industrial districts to particular subcontracting patterns on the basis of the overall incidence of subcontracting, its directionality, the durability of relationships, producers' motivations for externalizing production, and other producer characteristics. We then apply our model in assessing the subcontracting patterns we found among a sample of Madrid electronics producers, which we conclude comprise an emerging high-technology district. RAMA R., FERGUSON D. et MELERO A. (2003). Les réseaux de sous- traitants dans les districts industriels: l'électronique à Madrid, Reg. Studies 37 , 71-88. Avec l'introduction récente des typologies des districts industriels, la notion de "district industriel' va au- delà des districts classiques, à savoir spécialisés de façon souple et vulgarisés dans les études de cas italiens pour comprendre, parmi d'autres, des districts "rayonnants' et des technopoles. Rares sont les études qui comparent des districts moins connus ou naissants à ces modèles. Dans la comparaison des districts industriels, une question importante à aborder a été la faible identification et la mesure peu méthodique de la connectivité interentreprise et des "réseaux'. Cet article cherche à avancer la notion que sous-traiter la production constitue une mesure empirique systématique, pourtant relativement inexplorée, de la connectivité des districts, et qu'elle varie de façon uniforme quant à sa nature et à sa portée à travers une typologie de districts. On présente un modèle qui cherche à établir un rapport entre une typologie de districts industriels et des modes de sous-traitance particuliers sur la base de la tendance générale à la sous-traitance, à son orientation, à la solidité des rapports, à la motivation des producteurs quant à l'externalisation de la production, et à d'autres caractéristiques des producteurs. Il s'ensuit une application du modèle afin d'évaluer les modes de sous-traitance qui proviennent d'un échantillon de producteurs dans l'électronique à Madrid, qui représente une technopole naissante. RAMA R., FERGUSON D. und MELERO A. (2003) Weitervergebende Netzwerke in Industriegebieten: die Elektronikindustrien von Madrid, Reg. Studies 37 , 71-88. Dank der kürzlich vorgenommenen Einführung typologischer Bezeichnungen für Industriegebiete ist der Begriff "Industriegebiet' über klassische "elastisch spezialisierte' Gebiete hinaus ausgedehnt worden, die sich in italienischen Fallstudien großer Beliebtheit erfreut hatten, um Nabe-und Speichengebiete, Technologiegebiete und andere miteinzubeziehen. Nur wenige Studien stellen Vergleiche zwischen diesen Modellen und weniger bekannten, erst in Entstehung begriffenen Distrikten auf. Es erhebt sich jedoch eine schwierige Frage beim Vergleich von Industriegebieten: die unzureichende Identifizierung und ungleichartige Messung der Verflechtung von Firmen und " Netzwerken'. In diesem Aufsatz wird vorgeschlagen, Weitervergebung von Produktion als ein folgerichtiges, doch verhältnismäßig unerforschtes empirisches Maß zwischengebietlicher Verflechtung aufzufassen, das seiner Natur und Umfang nach gleichmäßige Abweichungen über Gebietstypen hinweg unterworfen ist. Es wird ein Modell vorgestellt, das verschiedene Industriegebietstypen zu weitervergebenden Mustern in Verbindung setzt, und zwar auf der Grundlage des Gesamtvorkommens von Weitervergebung, seiner Ausrichtung, Dauerhaftigkeit der Beziehungen, Motivation zur Verlagerung der Produktion nach Außen und anderen Herstellereigenschaften. Das Modell wird dann dazu benutzt, die Weitervergebungsmuster einzuschätzen, die sich in Madrid bei einer unter Herstellern elektronischer Geräte durchgeführten Stichprobe ergaben, und daraus den Schluß zu ziehen, daß diese em neu aufkommendes Hochtechnologebiet darstellen.

2 January 2014 in Industry and Innovation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAdelheid Holl
Adelheid Holl
RRRuth Rama
Ruth Rama
Firms acquire external technological knowledge via different channels. In this paper, we compare the technology sourcing of foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms looking at domestic R&D outsourcing, international R&D outsourcing, domestic cooperation for innovation and international cooperation for innovation. We use data from the Spanish Technological Innovation Panel for the years 2005–2009 for 10,206 innovative firms operating in Spain. We apply a multivariate probit specification which allows for systematic correlations among the different choices. The results show that the different technology sourcing choices are interdependent and that foreign subsidiaries show a different pattern of external technology sourcing. Compared to affiliated domestic companies, foreign subsidiaries show a smaller propensity for external technology sourcing via R&D outsourcing from independent firms in the host country, for international R&D outsourcing and for international cooperation for innovation. In contrast, foreign subsidiaries show a greater propensity for domestic cooperation for innovation. However, foreign subsidiaries are not a homogenous group in this respect.