Chris Button

Dr. Chris Button

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 June 2014 in Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSusan Giblin
Susan Giblin
DCDave Collins
Dave Collins
CBChris Button
Chris Button
Physical literacy (PL) has become a major focus of physical education, physical activity and sports promotion worldwide. PL is a multifaceted conceptualisation of the skills required to fully realise potentials through embodied experience. Substantial financial investments in PL education by governments are underpinned by a wide range of anticipated benefits, including expectations of significant future savings to healthcare, improved physical and psychological well-being of the population, increased work-force productivity and raised levels of expertise in sport and exercise participation. However, disappointingly, scientific evidence showing the efficacy of PL interventions to successfully meet such high expectation is limited. We suggest that contradictions in research findings are due largely to limitations in movement assessment batteries and consequent discrepancies between measurements used to assess the immediate outcomes of PL programmes. Notably, there is no robust empirical tool for evidencing skill learning in the physical movement component of PL, education and this presents a serious limitation to the design of, and claims that can be made for, such interventions. Considering the parameters of proficient PL skills and the limitations of current evaluation instruments, possible future directions for developing empirical measures of PL movement skills are presented.

10 June 2007 in Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBChris Button
Chris Button
NAN. Anderson
N. Anderson
CBC. Bradford
C. Bradford
JCJ. D. Cotter
J. D. Cotter
PAP. N. Ainslie
P. N. Ainslie

CSCarlos Santos
Carlos Santos
Carolina BurnayCarolina Burnay
Carolina Burnay
CBChris Button
Chris Button
RCRita Cordovil
Rita Cordovil
This systematic review investigated the possible effects of exposing infants to formal activities in aquatic environments. A literature search of eight databases was concluded on 12 December 2022. Studies were eligible if they: (i) focused on 0–36 months of age infants, (ii) addressed the exposure of infants to formal aquatic activities, and (iii) compared the ‘same condition of aquatic exposure with the control’ or ‘before and after exposure’. The PRISMA protocol was used. Articles considered for inclusion (n = 18) were clustered in the health, development, and physiological outcome domains. The results show that research is focused on indoor activities, mainly in baby swimming programs and baby aquatic therapy interventions. Swimming and aquatic therapy practices are generally safe for babies’ health, and there are benefits to preterm and newborns exposed to aquatic therapy once the physiological parameters are maintained in normal and safe patterns. A positive effect is also suggested in general gross and fine motor skills, visual motion perception, cognitive flexibility, and response selection accuracy for infants who participated in aquatic programs. Further investigation with high-quality experimental designs is required to establish the effect of exposure of infants to formal aquatic activities (Systematic Review Registration: CRD42021248054).

8 December 2010 in Cognitive Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBChris Button
Chris Button
MDM. Dicks
M. Dicks
RHR. Haines
R. Haines
RBR. Barker
R. Barker
KDKeith Davids
Keith Davids

8 October 2021 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TDTina van Duijn
Tina van Duijn
JNJonathan Leo Ng
Jonathan Leo Ng
CBCarolina Burnay
Carolina Burnay
NANeil Anderson
Neil Anderson
LULuiz Uehara
Luiz Uehara
CBChris Button
Chris Button
Learning aquatic skills is an important component of developing physical literacy in children. Aquatic skills such as floating, swimming and safe entry/exit promote engagement in different water environments and may help preserve lives in an emergency. This scoping review was conducted to evaluate the influence of task constraints (i.e., equipment) and environmental constraints (i.e., physical and social) on how children learn foundational aquatic skills. In developed countries, children are typically taught in swimming pools under direct supervision. It is also not uncommon to see children and infants learning to swim with assistive equipment (e.g., buoyancy aids). However, perhaps surprisingly, the evidence on how and where children learn aquatic skills does not uniformly promote such practices. For example, the use of flotation devices has not been proven to aid skill learning. Some researchers have advocated that children should learn aquatic skills whilst wearing outdoor clothing. One benefit of children wearing clothing is an increased capacity to practice in colder water (such as the ocean, rivers, or lakes). Overall, whilst practitioners often use equipment for various reasons it seems that not all equipment is equally useful in promoting the acquisition of aquatic skills. In less developed countries, with limited access to swimming pools and fewer resources for private instruction, a range of different open water aquatic environments and practices, such as swimming in temporarily flooded areas, have been reported. Such strategies are in urgent demand of further research given that drowning rates in less developed countries around the world exceed those in developed nations. It can be argued that learning in pools does not afford the opportunities to develop the whole range of adaptive skills that may be required in different open water environments such as navigating currents and waves, floating whilst clothed, or making life-saving decisions. Consequently, a shift toward teaching in open water environments has occurred in several countries. This review provides an evidence-base upon which practitioners can design more effective aquatic education programs for children.

1 January 2015 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChris Button
Chris Button
JCJames L. Croft
James L. Croft
JCJames D. Cotter
James D. Cotter
MGMatthew J. Graham
Matthew J. Graham
SLSam Lucas
Sam Lucas