Objective: To describe the first cochlear array insertions using a robot-assisted technique, with different types of straight or precurved electrode arrays, compared with arrays manually inserted into the cochlea. Study Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Tertiary otologic center. Patients: Twenty cochlear implantations in the robot-assisted group and 40 in the manually inserted group. Interventions: Cochlear implantations using a robot-assisted technique (RobOtol) with straight (eight Cochlear CI522/622, and eight Advanced Bionics Hifocus Slim J) or precurved (four Advanced Bionics Hifocus Mid-Scala) matched to manual cochlear implantations. Three-dimensional reconstruction images of the basilar membrane and the electrode array were obtained from pre- and postimplantation computed tomography. Main Outcome Measures: Rate and localization of scalar translocations. Results: For straight electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 19% (3/16) of the robot-assisted group and 31% (10/32) of the manually inserted group. Considering the number of translocated electrodes, this was lower in the robot-assisted group (7%) than in the manually inserted group (16%) (p < 0.0001, χ ² test). For precurved electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 50% (2/4) of the robot-assisted group and 38% (3/8) of the manually inserted group. Conclusion: This study showed a safe and reliable insertion of different electrode array types with a robot-assisted technique, with a less traumatic robotic insertion of straight electrode arrays when compared with manual insertion.

Objective: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the sphenoid is a rare but potentially lethal complication that can occur after irradiation of nasopharyngeal and clival malignancies. The objective of this study was to describe a multimodal treatment strategy tailored to the clinical signs and to the radiological extent of the disease, and to report on its preliminary results.Methods: Retrospective monocentric study at a tertiary skull base center. Patients treated for a sphenoid ORN from January 2014 to August 2018 were identified and charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, histologic tumor type, previous treatments of the tumor, clinical signs at presentation, radiological data, treatment, and outcomes. Sphenoid ORN was treated by a combination of medical therapy, endovascular treatment, and/or surgery. The use of each of these therapeutic modalities was based on the extent of ORN and on the presenting signs.Results: Seven patients were included: four patients underwent endovascular treatment with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, five patients underwent surgical debridement, and covering of the exposed bone by a local flap, seven patients received antibiotics (in combination with pentoxyphilline, tocopherol, and clodronate in one case). Three patients died after progression of the ORN. The global survival rate was 57% (4/7) with a mean follow‐up of 24 months. In one case, ORN was treated successfully by medical treatment only, with a combination of antibiotics, pentoxyphilline, tocopherol, and clodronate.Conclusion: This retrospective study describes the results of a management strategy adapted to the extent of the disease in sphenoid ORN and based on medical therapy only, or on a combination of medical therapy, interventional radiology, and/or surgery.Level of evidence: 4

The scalar position of the electrode array is assumed to be associated with auditory performance after cochlear implantation. We propose a new method that can be routinely applied in clinical practice to assess the position of an electrode array. Ten basilar membrane templates were generated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), based on the dimensions of 100 cochleae. Five surgeons were blinded to determine the position of the electrode array in 30 cadaveric cochleae. The procedure consisted of selecting the appropriate template based on cochlear dimensions, merging the electrode array reconstruction with the template using four landmarks, determining the position of the array according to the template position, and comparing the results obtained to histology data. The time taken to analyze each implanted cochlea was approximately 12 min. We found that, according to histology, surgeons were in almost perfect agreement when determining an electrode translocated to the scala vestibuli with the perimodiolar MidScala array (Fleiss’ kappa (κ) = 0.82), and in moderate agreement when using the lateral wall EVO array (κ = 0.42). Our data indicate that an adapted basilar membrane template can be used as a rapid and reproducible method to assess the position of the electrode array after cochlear implantation.