Anna Price

Dr. Anna Price


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 October 2008 in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJordana K. Bayer
Jordana K. Bayer
HHHarriet Hiscock
Harriet Hiscock
OUObioha C. Ukoumunne
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
APAnna Price
Anna Price
MWMelissa Anne Wake
Melissa Anne Wake

1 January 2019 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
sharon goldfeldsharon goldfeld
sharon goldfeld
APAnna Price
Anna Price
CSCharlene Smith
Charlene Smith
TBTracey Bruce
Tracey Bruce
HBHannah Bryson
Hannah Bryson
LKLynn Kemp
Lynn Kemp
OBJECTIVES: Nurse home visiting (NHV) may redress inequities in children’s health and development evident by school entry. We tested the effectiveness of an Australian NHV program (right@home), offered to pregnant women experiencing adversity, hypothesizing improvements in (1) parent care, (2) responsivity, and (3) the home learning environment at child age 2 years. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of NHV delivered via universal child and family health services was conducted. Pregnant women experiencing adversity (≥2 of 10 risk factors) with sufficient English proficiency were recruited from antenatal clinics at 10 hospitals across 2 states. The intervention comprised 25 nurse visits to child age 2 years. Researchers blinded to randomization assessed 13 primary outcomes, including Home Observation of the Environment (HOME) Inventory (6 subscales) and 25 secondary outcomes. REULTS: Of 1427 eligible women, 722 (50.6%) were randomly assigned; 306 of 363 (84%) women in the intervention and 290 of 359 (81%) women in the control group provided 2-year data. Compared with women in the control group, those in the intervention reported more regular child bedtimes (adjusted odds ratio 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25 to 2.48), increased safety (adjusted mean difference [AMD] 0.22; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.37), increased warm parenting (AMD 0.09; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16), less hostile parenting (reverse scored; AMD 0.29; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.41), increased HOME parental involvement (AMD 0.26; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.38), and increased HOME variety in experience (AMD 0.20; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The right@home program improved parenting and home environment determinants of children’s health and development. With replicability possible at scale, it could be integrated into Australian child and family health services or trialed in countries with similar child health services.

31 January 2008 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHarriet Hiscock
Harriet Hiscock
JBJordana K Bayer
Jordana K Bayer
APAnna Price
Anna Price
OUObioha C Ukoumunne
Obioha C Ukoumunne
SRSusan Rogers
Susan Rogers
MWMelissa Anne Wake
Melissa Anne Wake
Objective To determine whether a parenting programme, offered universally in primary care, can prevent behavioural problems in children and improve parenting and maternal mental health. Design Cluster randomised trial. Setting 40 primary care nursing centres (clusters) in Victoria, Australia. Participants 733 English speaking mothers of 8 month old children sequentially recruited from well child appointments; 656 retained at 24 months. Intervention Structured three session programme at age 8-15 months, co-led by well child providers and a parenting expert. The programme covered normal development and behaviour, strategies to increase desired behaviour, and strategies to reduce unwanted behaviour. Main outcome measures Maternal report of child externalising behaviour (child behavior checklist 1½-5 year old), parenting (parent behavior checklist), and maternal mental health (depression anxiety stress scales) at 18 and 24 months. Results At 18 months, child behaviour and parenting scores were similar in the two groups. At 24 months, externalising scores in the intervention and control groups were similar (mean 11.9 (SD 7.2) v 12.9 (7.4)); however, on the parent behavior checklist subscale scores, intervention group parents were less likely to report harsh/abusive parenting (mean 38.9 (SD 7.7) v 40.5 (8.8); adjusted mean difference −1.83, 95% confidence interval −3.12 to −0.55) and unreasonable expectations of child development (40.9 (9.9) v 42.7 (9.6); −2.18, −3.74 to −0.62). Mean scores for nurturing parenting and maternal mental health were similar in the two groups at both times. Conclusions A universal parenting programme resulted in modest improvement in parenting factors that predict behavioural problems in children but did not reduce externalising behavioural problems or affect maternal mental health at 2 years. Trial registration ISRCTN 77531789.

1 October 2012 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAnna Price
Anna Price
MWMelissa Anne Wake
Melissa Anne Wake
OUObioha C. Ukoumunne
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
HHHarriet Hiscock
Harriet Hiscock
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Randomized trials have demonstrated the short- to medium-term effectiveness of behavioral infant sleep interventions. However, concerns persist that they may harm children’s emotional development and subsequent mental health. This study aimed to determine long-term harms and/or benefits of an infant behavioral sleep program at age 6 years on (1) child, (2) child-parent, and (3) maternal outcomes. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-six children (173 intervention) with parent-reported sleep problems at age 7 months were selected from a population sample of 692 infants recruited from well-child centers. The study was a 5-year follow-up of a population-based cluster-randomized trial. Allocation was concealed and researchers (but not parents) were blinded to group allocation. Behavioral techniques were delivered over 1 to 3 individual nurse consultations at infant age 8 to 10 months, versus usual care. The main outcomes measured were (1) child mental health, sleep, psychosocial functioning, stress regulation; (2) child-parent relationship; and (3) maternal mental health and parenting styles. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five families (69%) participated. There was no evidence of differences between intervention and control families for any outcome, including (1) children’s emotional (P = .8) and conduct behavior scores (P = .6), sleep problems (9% vs 7%, P = .2), sleep habits score (P = .4), parent- (P = .7) and child-reported (P = .8) psychosocial functioning, chronic stress (29% vs 22%, P = .4); (2) child-parent closeness (P = .1) and conflict (P = .4), global relationship (P = .9), disinhibited attachment (P = .3); and (3) parent depression, anxiety, and stress scores (P = .9) or authoritative parenting (63% vs 59%, P = .5). CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral sleep techniques have no marked long-lasting effects (positive or negative). Parents and health professionals can confidently use these techniques to reduce the short- to medium-term burden of infant sleep problems and maternal depression.

16 December 2013 in Archives of Disease in Childhood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAnna Price
Anna Price
JBJ. E. Brown
J. E. Brown
MBMichael Bittman
Michael Bittman
MWMelissa Anne Wake
Melissa Anne Wake
JQJon Quach
Jon Quach
HHHarriet Hiscock
Harriet Hiscock
Objective To provide accurate population normative data documenting cross-sectional, age-specific sleep patterns in Australian children aged 0–9 years. Design and setting The first three waves of the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, comprising two cohorts recruited in 2004 at ages 0–1 years (n=5107) and 4–5 years (n=4983), and assessed biennially. Participants Children with analysable sleep data for at least one wave. Measures At every wave, parents prospectively completed 24-h time-use diaries for a randomly selected week or weekend day. ‘Sleeping, napping’ was one of the 26 precoded activities recorded in 15-min time intervals. Results From 0 to 9 years of age, 24-h sleep duration fell from a mean peak of 14 (SD 2.2) h at 4–6 months to 10 (SD 1.9) h at 9 years, mainly due to progressively later mean sleep onset time from 20:00 (SD 75 min) to 21:00 (SD 60 min) and declining length of day sleep from 3.0 (SD 1.7) h to 0.03 (SD 0.2) h. Number and duration of night wakings also fell. By primary school, wake and sleep onset times were markedly later on weekend days. The most striking feature of the centile charts is the huge variation at all ages in sleep duration, sleep onset time and, especially, wake time in this normal population. Conclusions Parents and professionals can use these new centile charts to judge normalcy of children's sleep. In future research, these population parameters will now be used to empirically determine optimal child sleep patterns for child and parent outcomes like mental and physical health.

18 April 2011 in Medical Journal of Australia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHarriet Hiscock
Harriet Hiscock
GRGehan Roberts
Gehan Roberts
DEDaryl Efron
Daryl Efron
JSJillian R Sewell
Jillian R Sewell
HBHannah E Bryson
Hannah E Bryson
MWMelissa Anne Wake
Melissa Anne Wake
Objective: To audit general paediatric outpatient practice in Australia, including consultation characteristics and management patterns, diagnoses, factors associated with diagnoses, and billing prac...