Jessica Metcalfe

Dr. Jessica Metcalfe


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 August 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMelissa Pflugh Prescott
Melissa Pflugh Prescott
XBXanna Burg
Xanna Burg
JMJessica Metcalfe
Jessica Metcalfe
ALAlexander E. Lipka
Alexander E. Lipka
CHCameron Herritt
Cameron Herritt
LCLeslie D. Cunningham-Sabo
Leslie D. Cunningham-Sabo
Emerging evidence suggests a link between young people’s interest in alternative food production practices and dietary quality. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a student-driven sustainable food systems education and promotion intervention on adolescent school lunch selection, consumption, and waste behaviors. Sixth grade science teachers at two middle schools (n = 268 students) implemented a standards-based curriculum on sustainable food systems, addressing the environmental impacts of food choices and food waste. The cumulating curriculum activity required the 6th grade students to share their food systems knowledge with their 7th and 8th grade counterparts (n = 426) through a cafeteria promotional campaign to discourage food waste. School-wide monthly plate waste assessments were used to evaluate changes in vegetable consumption and overall plate waste using a previously validated digital photography method. At baseline, the intervention students consumed significantly less vegetables relative to the control group (47.1% and 71.8% of vegetables selected, respectively (p = 0.006). This disparity was eliminated after the intervention with the intervention group consuming 69.4% and the control consuming 68.1% of selected vegetables (p = 0.848). At five months follow up, the intervention group wasted significantly less salad bar vegetables compared to the control group (24.2 g and 50.1 g respectively (p = 0.029). These findings suggest that food systems education can be used to promote improved dietary behaviors among adolescent youth.

Karen GlanzKaren Glanz
Karen Glanz
JMJessica Metcalfe
Jessica Metcalfe
SFSara Folta
Sara Folta
Alison G.M. BrownAlison G.M. Brown
Alison G.M. Brown
BFBarbara Fiese
Barbara Fiese
In-home and shared meals have been hypothesized to have positive effects. This narrative review examines research on the influence of in-home eating on diet quality, health outcomes, and family relationships. A combination search approach included a search of PubMed, backward searches of previous published reviews, and studies the authors were familiar with. A search identified 118 publications; 54 original studies and 11 review studies were included in this review. Each study was reviewed and summarized. The diverse designs precluded quantitative data synthesis. Relatively strong evidence from cross-sectional research supports the association of shared family meals with favorable dietary patterns in children and adolescents, including consumption of fruits, vegetables, and healthful nutrients. Correlational evidence links shared meals with health and psychosocial outcomes in youth, including less obesity, decreased risk for eating disorders, and academic achievement. Most evidence is cross-sectional, thus, limiting attribution of causality. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that interventions improve the frequency of shared meals, improve diet, or prevent child obesity. Despite the “common wisdom”, the evidence that in-home, shared meals, per se, have positive effects on diet quality, health outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, and family relationships is limited due to weak research designs and single-item measurement of the independent variable. More research, with stronger designs, is warranted.


21 March 2022 in Public Health Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJessica Metcalfe
Jessica Metcalfe
JMJennifer McCaffrey
Jennifer McCaffrey
MSMelissa Schumacher
Melissa Schumacher
CKCaitlin Kownacki
Caitlin Kownacki
MPMelissa Pflugh Prescott
Melissa Pflugh Prescott
Objective: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the Market to MyPlate (M2MP) program on participants’ reported farmers’ market (FM) attitudes and shopping behaviours, frequency of serving vegetables to their families, food resource management behaviours and food security. A secondary objective was to identify facilitators and barriers to shopping at FM and food waste reduction techniques used by low-income families.Design: The current study used a mixed methods evaluation embedded within a cluster randomised trial of the M2MP intervention.Setting: The 7-week M2MP program was delivered at Extension offices and community centres in central Illinois.Participants: Participants included 120 adults and their families. Class cohorts were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) nutrition education and cooking classes with produce allocations (PAE,n39); (2) nutrition education and cooking classes only (EO,n36) or (3) control group (n45).Results: Compared with control participants, PAE participants were significantly more likely to report shopping at FM (P= 0·029) and reported serving more vegetables to their families (P= 0·010) (EO participants did not differ from the control group on any outcomes). There were no differences between conditions in survey-based measures of food security or food resource management behaviours. Interview results describe facilitators and barriers to shopping at FM and a variety of food waste reduction techniques (including food placement and food resource management).Conclusions: These findings suggest that fresh produce provision coupled with nutrition and culinary education can positively impact shopping and dietary behaviours.

6 September 2021 in Public Health Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJessica Metcalfe
Jessica Metcalfe
MPMelissa Pflugh Prescott
Melissa Pflugh Prescott
MSMelissa Schumacher
Melissa Schumacher
CKCaitlin Kownacki
Caitlin Kownacki
JMJennifer McCaffrey
Jennifer McCaffrey
Objective: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the Market to MyPlate (M2MP) program on fruit and vegetable consumption and cooking behaviours. Secondary objectives were to examine factors that affected participant retention and program completion, and analyse program feedback provided by participants.Design: This study conducted a mixed methods evaluation embedded within a cluster randomised controlled trial of the M2MP intervention. Adult participants completed a pre- and post-program survey reporting on their fruit and vegetable consumption and cooking behaviours. A subsample participated in structured interviews, providing feedback about M2MP and the impact of the program.Setting: Seven weekly classes took place in community centres and extension offices in central Illinois.Participants: 120 adults and their families participated. Class cohorts were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) nutrition education and cooking classes with produce allocations (PAE,n39); (2) nutrition education and cooking classes only (EO,n36) or (3) control group (n45).Results: Compared to control, PAE participants reported larger increases from pre- to post-intervention in fruit (P= 0·001) and vegetable consumption (P= 0·002), with no differences in cooking frequency. Interview analyses identified key themes in behaviour changes due to M2MP, including reported increases in dietary variety, cooking self-efficacy and children’s participation in cooking.Conclusions: PAE participants who received an intervention that directly increased their access to fresh produce (via produce allocations) increased their reported fruit and vegetable consumption. Though participants’ cooking frequency did not change, interviewees reported increased variety, cooking confidence and family participation in cooking.

NHNader Hamdi
Nader Hamdi
BEBrenna Ellison
Brenna Ellison
JMJennifer McCaffrey
Jennifer McCaffrey
JMJessica Metcalfe
Jessica Metcalfe
AHAshley Hoffman
Ashley Hoffman
MPMelissa Pflugh Prescott
Melissa Pflugh Prescott
Nudge interventions are widely used to promote health in schools, yet implementation metrics are seldom used to understand intervention outcomes. A multi-component intervention consisting of cafeteria decorations, creative names, social norming taste tests, and flavor station components was implemented in three rural elementary school cafeterias by school nutrition services (SNS) and extension staff. Selection and consumption of fruits and vegetables at lunch were measured through monthly plate waste assessments over eight months (n = 1255 trays). Interviews were conducted with SNS staff (n = 3) upon completion of the intervention to assess implementation outcomes using validated acceptability and feasibility metrics. Consumption findings were generally inconsistent across schools and time points, yet fruit consumption increased at School 1 (p < 0.05) during the taste test and flavor station intervention months and School 2 (p < 0.001) during the creative names intervention months compared to baseline. Odds of selecting a vegetable at School 3 were three times higher than baseline during the taste test intervention months (odds ratio (OR), 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3–6.5). Cafeteria decorations and taste tests had higher reported implementation metrics for acceptability and feasibility than other interventions. Thematic analysis underscored the facilitating role of extension support, as well as systems factors, which served as facilitators and barriers across schools and interventions. These findings suggest that nudge interventions are a promising strategy to improve vegetable selection and fruit consumption in school meal programs.