This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore expectations of patients and healthcare experts for an online self-management program for rheumatoid arthritis. Participants were recruited from rheumatology clinics, medical centers, and universities in Taiwan. Individual face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 16) and healthcare experts (n = 7). Content analysis of the interview data resulted in five subthemes for expectations of an online self-management program: information about how the disease trajectory would impact future health status, availability of opportunities for self-monitoring, opportunities to interact with fellow patients and healthcare providers, simplicity and ease-of-use of the program, and methods to facilitate patient-motivation. These subthemes formulated two overarching themes: content and format. An online self-management program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis should provide evidence-based information about disease variables and behaviors aligned with the specific needs of the individual and adopt strategies that encourage and increase motivation and confidence.
Background: Self-management programs can help patients with rheumatoid arthritis develop strategies to address their disease-related problems. However, accessibility to traditional self-management programs is often limited. Purpose: This study was developed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of a smartphone-delivered self-management program application (app) for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: A two-arm (intervention vs. control) randomized controlled trial was used. Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis were recruited from the rheumatology departments of a medical center. Study enrollment capabilities were limited by current pandemic restrictions. The patients who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate (N = 46) were enrolled as participants and randomly assigned either to the intervention group (n = 25), which received instructions on the use of a smartphone app designed to facilitate the self-management of rheumatoid arthritis, or to the control group (n = 21), which received instructions on related self-management only. The outcome variables were assessed at baseline and at 8 and 12 weeks. Differences in between-group outcomes over time were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Feasibility and acceptability were also evaluated. Data were collected between August 1, 2020, and July 31, 2022. Results: At baseline, no differences were detected between the two groups in terms of the demographic and disease characteristics of concern. Outcome measures for the intervention group improved significantly more than the control group for self-efficacy of pain at 8 weeks (B = 6.39, p < .05) and for both of self-efficacy of pain and self-management behavior at 12 weeks (B = 9.16, p < .05, and B = 4.25, p < .001, respectively). Factors related to app ease of use included limiting pop-ups and windows and having no time restrictions. Most of the participants reported the app as acceptable and easy to use, although challenges relating to using technology limited the usability of the app for some. Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The smartphone app was shown to improve self-efficacy of pain and self-management behaviors. However, an accurate assessment of the effectiveness of the app and generalizability of the findings is limited by the smaller-than-desired sample size due to the COVID-19 pandemic and technological challenges. A greater understanding of how to overcome technological challenges is needed to optimize the delivery of self-management programs via smartphone-based apps. Studies reevaluating this app on a larger sample size should be conducted.
Rheumatoid arthritis results in progressive destruction of the joints. However, descriptions of patient’s experiences with the disease are limited. This qualitative study aimed to explore patients’ personal experiences with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 30 patients from January to May 2019; interview data were analyzed with content analysis. Most participants were female (90%); their mean age was 57 years. Three main categories emerged from analysis of the data: “physical suffering,” “limitations of abilities,” and “coexisting with the disease.” Physical suffering was due to personal lifelong hardships from chronic pain and stiffness. Limitations of abilities occurred from loss of physical function and limited social life, due to participants discomfort with joint deformities and their appearance to others. Participants coexisted with the disease by making changes in their outlook and comparing their lives with others in order to gain a positive perspective.
This study aimed to determine whether there were gender differences in the effectiveness of a 12-week dietary self-management program for older community-dwelling adults in northeast Taiwan. This was a secondary analysis of a previous study; participants (N = 58) were purposively sampled from two public health centers. Non-parametric models examined differences in outcome measures because of the small sample size; 20 males and 38 females completed the study. The results showed males scored significantly better than females for nutritional status, internal health locus of control, and responsibility for food preparation, which may have implications for older female adults’ nutritional health.