Aisling Caffrey

Dr. Aisling Caffrey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 November 2018 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBEric Borrelli
Eric Borrelli
ELErica Y. Lee
Erica Y. Lee
ADAndrew M. Descoteaux
Andrew M. Descoteaux
SKStephen J. Kogut
Stephen J. Kogut
ACAisling Caffrey
Aisling Caffrey

15 March 2022 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAHaley J Appaneal
Haley J Appaneal
VLVrishali V. Lopes
Vrishali V. Lopes
KLKerry L. LaPlante
Kerry L. LaPlante
ACAisling Caffrey
Aisling Caffrey
The objectives were to analyze treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection. This was a retrospective cohort study of inpatients with A. baumannii cultures and treatment from 2010 to 2019.

1 January 2018 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELErica Yookyung Lee
Erica Yookyung Lee
ACAisling Caffrey
Aisling Caffrey
Several studies have suggested the risk of thrombocytopenia with tedizolid, a second-in-class oxazolidinone antibiotic (approved June 2014), is less than that observed with linezolid (first-in-class oxazolidinone). Using data from the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (July 2014 through December 2016), we observed significantly increased risks of thrombocytopenia of similar magnitudes with both antibiotics: linezolid reporting odds ratio [ROR], 37.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.78 to 69.17); tedizolid ROR, 34.0 (95% CI, 4.67 to 247.30).

29 April 2025 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HAHaley J. Appaneal
Haley J. Appaneal
VLVrishali V. Lopes
Vrishali V. Lopes
LPLaura Puzniak
Laura Puzniak
EZEvan J. Zasowski
Evan J. Zasowski
LJLuis Jodar
Luis Jodar
ACAisling Caffrey
Aisling Caffrey
This test-negative case-control study within the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System aims to estimate early vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the BNT162b2 KP.2 vaccine (2024–2025 formulation) compared to not receiving the KP.2 vaccine against COVID-19 outcomes. The study includes adult patients (age ≥18 years) with an acute respiratory infection (ARI) in hospital, emergency department and urgent care (ED/UC), or outpatient settings between September 5 and November 30, 2024. Separate multivariable logistic regression models compare the odds of receiving BNT162b2 KP.2 vaccine among SARS-CoV-2 positive cases and test-negative controls within each ARI outcome category, while adjusting for potentially confounding variables. Among 44,598 ARI episodes, VE is 68% (42–82%), 57% (46–65%), and 56% (36–69%) against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, emergency department and urgent care visits, and outpatient visits, respectively. Uptake of updated COVID-19 vaccines is low (3.7%).

1 March 2017 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAisling Caffrey
Aisling Caffrey
TTTristan T. Timbrook
Tristan T. Timbrook
ENEunsun Noh
Eunsun Noh
GSGeorge Sakoulas
George Sakoulas
SOSteven M. Opal
Steven M. Opal
KLKerry L. LaPlante
Kerry L. LaPlante
In addition to cholesterol-lowering capabilities, statins possess anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. We sought to quantify the real-world impact of different statin exposure patterns on clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among hospitalized patients with positive S. aureus blood cultures receiving appropriate antibiotics within 48 h of culture collection (Veterans Affairs hospitals, 2002 to 2013). Three statin exposure groups were compared to nonusers: pretreated statin users initiating therapy in the 30 days prior to culture and either (i) continuing statin therapy after culture or (ii) not continuing after culture, and (iii) de novo users initiating at culture. Nonusers included patients without statins in the year prior to culture through discharge. Propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed. We were able to balance significantly different baseline characteristics using propensity score matching for pretreated without continuation ( n = 331), pretreated with continuation ( n = 141), and de novo ( n = 177) statin users compared to nonusers. We observed a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.84; number needed to treat [NNT], 10) among pretreated and continued statin users, while protective effects were not observed in de novo (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.82; NNT, undefined) or pretreated but not continued (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.32; NNT, 47) users. In our national cohort study among patients with S. aureus bacteremia, continuation of statin therapy among incident statin users was associated with significant beneficial effects on mortality, including a 54% lower 30-day mortality rate.

2 November 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAisling Caffrey
Aisling Caffrey
HAHaley J. Appaneal
Haley J. Appaneal
VLVrishali V. Lopes
Vrishali V. Lopes
LPLaura Puzniak
Laura Puzniak
EZEvan J. Zasowski
Evan J. Zasowski
JMJohn M. McLaughlin
John M. McLaughlin
Data evaluating effectiveness of XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines against JN.1-related endpoints are scarce. This nationwide test-negative case-control study within the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System aims to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine compared to not receiving an XBB vaccine of any kind against COVID-19 hospitalization, emergency department or urgent care visits (ED/UC), and outpatient visits. Between September 25, 2023 and January 31, 2024, effectiveness was 24–35% during a period of JN.1 predominance and 50–61% during XBB predominance across all outcomes. VE within 60 days of vaccination during the likely JN.1 period was 32% (95% confidence interval 3–52%) against hospitalization, 41% (23–54%) against ED/UC visits, and 31% (1–52%) against outpatient visits. Corresponding VE during the likely XBB period was 62% (44–74%), 52% (37–63%), and 50% (25–66%) by setting, respectively. Here, we show the importance of strain match to maximize the public health impact of COVID-19 vaccination.