Zifei Liu

Dr. Zifei Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 August 2005 in Journal of Environmental Monitoring
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FLFuyan Liang
Fuyan Liang
MLMingming Lu
Mingming Lu
TKTim C. Keener
Tim C. Keener
Zifei LiuZifei Liu
Zifei Liu
SKSoon-Jai Khang
Soon-Jai Khang
Diesel-powered equipment is known to emit significant quantities of fine particulate matter to the atmosphere. Numerous organic compounds can be adsorbed onto the surfaces of these inhalable particles, among which polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are considered potential occupational carcinogens. Guidelines have been established by various agencies regarding diesel emissions and various control technologies are under development. The purpose of this study is to identify, quantify and compare the organic compounds in diesel particulate matter (DPM) with the diesel fuel and engine oil used in a non-road diesel generator. Approximately 90 organic compounds were quantified (with molecular weight ranging from 120 to 350), which include alkanes, PAHs, alkylated PAHs, alkylbenzenes and alkanoic acids. The low sulfur diesel fuel contains 61% alkanes and 7.1% of PAHs. The identifiable portion of the engine oil contains mainly the alkanoic and benzoic acids. The composition of DPM suggests that they may be originated from unburned diesel fuel, engine oil evaporation and combustion generated products. Compared with diesel fuel, DPM contains fewer fractions of alkanes and more PAH compounds, with the shift toward higher molecular weight ones. The enrichment of compounds with higher molecular weight in DPM may be combustion related (pyrogenic).

3 August 2007 in Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Zifei LiuZifei Liu
Zifei Liu
LWLingjuan Wang
Lingjuan Wang
DBDavid Beasley
David Beasley
EOEdgar Orlando Oviedo
Edgar Orlando Oviedo

1 May 2006 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLFuyan Liang
Fuyan Liang
MLMingming Lu
Mingming Lu
MBM. Eileen Birch
M. Eileen Birch
TKTim C. Keener
Tim C. Keener
Zifei LiuZifei Liu
Zifei Liu

10 September 2005 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zifei LiuZifei Liu
Zifei Liu
MLMingming Lu
Mingming Lu
MBM. Eileen Birch
M. Eileen Birch
TKTim C. Keener
Tim C. Keener
SKSoon-Jai Khang
Soon-Jai Khang
FLFuyan Liang
Fuyan Liang

1 April 2014 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zifei LiuZifei Liu
Zifei Liu
WPW. Powers
W. Powers
JMJ. Murphy
J. Murphy
RMR. Maghirang
R. Maghirang
Literature on NH3 and H2S emissions from swine production facilities in North America was reviewed, and a meta-analysis was conducted on measured emissions data from swine houses and manure storage facilities as well as concentration data in the vicinity of swine production facilities. Results from more than 80 studies were compiled with results from the 11 swine sites in the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study (NAEMS). Data across studies were analyzed statistically using the MIXED procedures of SAS. The median emission rates from swine houses across various production stages and manure handling systems were 2.78 and 0.09 kg/yr per pig for NH3 and H2S, respectively. The median emission rates from swine storage facilities were 2.08 and 0.20 kg/yr per pig for NH3 and H2S, respectively. The size of swine farm that may trigger the need to report NH3 emissions under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) is 3,410 pigs on the basis of the median NH3 emission rate (4.86 kg/yr per pig), but the threshold can be as low as 992 pigs on the basis of the 90th-percentile emission rates (16.71 kg/yr per pig). Swine hoop houses had significantly higher NH3 emission rate (14.80 kg/yr per pig) than other manure-handling systems (P < 0.01), whereas deep-pit houses had the highest H2S emission rate (16.03 kg/yr per pig, P = 0.03). Farrowing houses had the highest H2S emission rate (2.50 kg/yr per pig), followed by gestation houses, and finishing houses had the lowest H2S emission rate (P < 0.01). Regression models for NH3 and H2S emission rates were developed for finishing houses with deep pits, recharge pits, and lagoons. The NH3 emission rates increased with increasing air temperature, but effects of air temperature on H2S emission rates were not significant. The recharge interval of manure pits significantly affected H2S but not NH3 emission rates. The H2S emission rates were also influenced by the size of the operation. Although NH3 and H2S concentrations at the edge of swine houses or lagoons were often higher than corresponding acute or intermediate minimum risk levels (MRL), they decreased quickly to less than corresponding chronic or intermediate MRL as distances from emission sources increased. At the distances 30 to 1,185 m from emission sources, the average ambient concentrations for NH3 and H2S were 46 ± 46 µg/m3 and 4.3 ± 8.6 µg/m3 respectively.

18 January 2012 in Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QLQian-Feng Li
Qian-Feng Li
Lingjuan Wang-LiLingjuan Wang-Li
Lingjuan Wang-Li
Zifei LiuZifei Liu
Zifei Liu
AHAlbert J. Heber
Albert J. Heber
The tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) is one type of continuous ambient particulate matter (PM) monitor. Adsorption and desorption of moisture and semivolatile species may cause positive or negative artifacts in TEOM PM mass measurement. The objective of this field study was to investigate possible uncertainties associated with TEOM measurements in the poultry operation environment. For comparisons of TEOM with filter-based gravimetric method, four instruments (TEOM-PM10, low-volume PM10 sampler, TEOM-PM2.5, and PM2.5 speciation sampler) were collocated and tested inside a poultry house for PM2.5 and PM10 (PM with aerodynamic equivalent diameter ≤2.5 and ≤10 μm, respectively) measurements. Fifteen sets of 24-hr PM10 concentrations and 13 sets of 24-hr PM2.5 measurements were obtained. Results indicate that compared with filter-based gravimetric method, TEOM gave significantly lower values of both PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations. For PM10, the average ratio of TEOM to the gravimetric method was 0.936. For PM2.5, the average ratio of TEOM to the gravimetric method was 0.738. Particulate matter in the poultry houses possibly contains semivolatile compounds and moisture due to high levels of relative humidity (RH) and gas pollutants. The internal heating mechanism of the TEOM may cause losses in mass through volatilization. To investigate the effects of TEOM settings on concentration measurements, the heaters of two identical TEOMs were set at 50 °C, 30 °C, or no heating at all. They were collocated and tested for total suspended particle (TSP), PM10, and PM2.5 measurements in layer house for 6 weeks. For all TSP, PM10, and PM2.5 measurements, the internal TEOM temperature setting had a significant effect (P < 0.05). Significantly higher PM mass concentrations were measured at lower temperature settings. The effects of environmental (i.e., temperature, RH, NH3 and CO2 concentrations) and instrumental (i.e., filter loading and noise) parameters on PM measurements were also assessed using regression analysis.