Despite remarkable recent progress in developing anti-cancer agents, outcomes of patients with solid tumors remain unsatisfactory. In general, anti-cancer drugs are systemically administered through peripheral veins and delivered throughout the body. The major problem with systemic chemotherapy is insufficient uptake of intravenous (IV) drugs by targeted tumor tissue. Although dose escalation and treatment intensification have been attempted in order to increase regional concentrations of anti-tumor drugs, these approaches have produced only marginal benefits in terms of patient outcomes, while often damaging healthy organs. To overcome this problem, local administration of anti-cancer agents can yield markedly higher drug concentrations in tumor tissue with less systemic toxicity. This strategy is most commonly used for liver and brain tumors, as well as pleural or peritoneal malignancies. Although the concept is theoretically reasonable, survival benefits are still limited. This review summarizes clinical results and problems and discusses future directions of regional cancer therapy with local administration of chemotherapeutants.

Background: Patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal involvement have a dismal prognosis. Recent clinical trials have shown that anti-Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) antibody (zolbetuximab) enhances survival in patients with GC expressing high levels of CLDN18.2. However, the effectiveness of the zolbetuximab in patients with peritoneal metastases (PMs) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the expression of CLDN18.2 in disseminated lesions to assess the clinical utility of zolbetuximab in the treatment of GC with PM. Methods: In 42 patients diagnosed with stage IV GC with PM, biopsy samples from the primary tumors and peritoneal metastatic nodules were collected and immunostained using the specific antibody (43-14A, Ventana). The expression of CLDN18.2 was comparatively evaluated based on staining intensity and the proportion of positive cells. Results: Positive immunoreactivity of CLDN18.2 was observed in 37 (88%) of the primary tumors. Specifically, CLDN18.2 positivity was identified in 26 (62%) or 12 (29%) patients based on moderate to strong membrane staining in at least 40% or 75% of tumor cells, respectively. In comparison, the staining intensity in tumor cells was consistently reduced in PM across all patients. CLDN18.2 expression was absent in PM of 29 (69%) patients, while 3 (7.1%) cases were determined to be CLDN18.2-positive based on a cutoff value of 40% for high staining. This trend was particularly pronounced in cases with undifferentiated type and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative primary tumors. Conclusions: Although CLDN18.2 expression in PM mirrored that in primary lesions, the levels were generally reduced. When zolbetuximab is used for GC patients with peritoneal involvement, it is preferable to assess the expression of CLDN18.2 in the disseminated lesions.

Introduction: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most common site of recurrence following curative resection for advanced gastric cancer (GC). Along with disease progression, it can lead to complications such as intestinal obstruction, hydronephrosis, obstructive jaundice, and ascites, significantly impairing the patient’s quality of life. Therefore, peritoneal metastasis is considered a critical target for treatment. In general, these patients are treated with systemic chemotherapy; however, the therapeutic effect is often limited due to the anticancer agents’ poor penetration into the peritoneal cavity. We aim to identify factors associated with the best overall survival (OS) in GC patients with peritoneal metastasis. Methods: Patients with advanced GC who were diagnosed as having macroscopic PM or positive peritoneal cytology by staging laparoscopy were enrolled. We introduced intraperitoneal Paclitaxel (IP-PTX) combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX). Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection was performed as conversion surgery when the PM showed an excellent response. Results: Ninety-six patients received IP-PTX + SOX, with a median of 16 courses. The 1- and 5-year OS rates were 70.2% and 24.5%, respectively, with a mean survival time (MST) of 20.0 months. No chemotherapy-related mortality was observed. Conversion surgery was performed in 44 patients (45.8%), with a 1-year OS rate of 100%. Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy using the IP-PTX + SOX regimen is highly effective and is recommended as induction chemotherapy for patients with PM from GC. Conversion gastrectomy should be considered following an excellent response, particularly in patients with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores below 20.

Gastrointestinal cancer with massive nodal metastases is a lethal disease. In this study, using a porcine model, we infused the anti-cancer drug Paclitaxel (PTX) into thoracic ducts to examine the efficiency of drug delivery to intra-abdominal lymph nodes. We established a technical method to catheterize the thoracic duct in the necks of pigs. We then compared the pharmacokinetics of PTX administered intrathoracically with those of systemic (intravenous) infusion. Serum, liver, and spleen concentrations of PTX were significantly lower following thoracic duct (IT) infusion than after intravenous (IV) administration approximately 1–8 h post-infusion. However, PTX levels in abdominal lymph nodes were maintained at relatively high levels up to 24 h after IT infusion compared to after IV infusion. Concentrations of PTX in urine were much higher after IT administration than after IV administration. After IT infusion, the same concentration of PTX was obtained in abdominal lymph nodes, but the serum concentration was lower than after systemic infusion. Therefore, IT infusion may be able to achieve higher PTX doses than IV infusion. IT delivery of anti-cancer drugs into the thoracic duct may yield clinical benefits for patients with extensive lymphatic metastases in abdominal malignancies.