Ana Goode

Dr. Ana Goode


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAna Goode
Ana Goode
MRMarina M Reeves
Marina M Reeves
EEElizabeth G. Eakin
Elizabeth G. Eakin

2 April 2020 in Annual Review of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NONeville Owen
Neville Owen
GHGenevieve Nissa Healy
Genevieve Nissa Healy
PDPaddy C Dempsey
Paddy C Dempsey
JSJo Salmon
Jo Salmon
ATAnna Timperio
Anna Timperio
DDDavid Dunstan
David Dunstan
In developed and developing countries, social, economic, and environmental transitions have led to physical inactivity and large amounts of time spent sitting. Research is now unraveling the adverse public health consequences of too much sitting. We describe improvements in device-based measurement that are providing new insights into sedentary behavior and health. We consider the implications of research linking evidence from epidemiology and behavioral science with mechanistic insights into the underlying biology of sitting time. Such evidence has led to new sedentary behavior guidelines and initiatives. We highlight ways that this emerging knowledge base can inform public health strategy: First, we consider epidemiologic and experimental evidence on the health consequences of sedentary behavior; second, we describe solutions-focused research from initiatives in workplaces and schools. To inform a broad public health strategy, researchers need to pursue evidence-informed collaborations with occupational health, education, and other sectors.

11 March 2015 in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAna Goode
Ana Goode
SLSheleigh Lawler
Sheleigh Lawler
CBCharlotte Brakenridge
Charlotte Brakenridge
MRMarina M Reeves
Marina M Reeves
EEElizabeth G. Eakin
Elizabeth G. Eakin

21 December 2015 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EEElizabeth G. Eakin
Elizabeth G. Eakin
SHSandra C Hayes
Sandra C Hayes
MHMarion R. Haas
Marion R. Haas
MRMarina M Reeves
Marina M Reeves
JVJanette Vardy
Janette Vardy
ERErin L. Robson
Erin L. Robson
Given evidence shows physical activity, a healthful diet and weight management can improve cancer outcomes and reduce chronic disease risk, the major cancer organisations and health authorities have endorsed related guidelines for cancer survivors. Despite these, and a growing evidence base on effective lifestyle interventions, there is limited uptake into survivorship care. Healthy Living after Cancer (HLaC) is a national dissemination and implementation study that will evaluate the integration of an evidence-based lifestyle intervention for cancer survivors into an existing telephone cancer information and support service delivered by Australian state-based Cancer Councils. Eligible participants (adults having completed cancer treatment with curative intent) will receive 12 health coaching calls over 6 months from Cancer Council nurses/allied health professionals targeting national guidelines for physical activity, healthy eating and weight control. Using the RE-AIM evaluation framework, primary outcomes are service-level indicators of program reach, adoption, implementation/costs and maintenance, with secondary (effectiveness) outcomes of patient-reported anthropometric, behavioural and psychosocial variables collected at pre- and post-program completion. The total participant accrual target across four participating Cancer Councils is 900 over 3 years. The national scope of the project and broad inclusion of cancer survivors, alongside evaluation of service-level indicators, associated costs and patient-reported outcomes, will provide the necessary practice-based evidence needed to inform future allocation of resources to support healthy living among cancer survivors. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12615000882527 (registered on 24/08/2015)

10 May 2016 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BFBrianna S Fjeldsoe
Brianna S Fjeldsoe
AGAna Goode
Ana Goode
PPPhilayrath Phongsavan
Philayrath Phongsavan
BABauman Adrian
Bauman Adrian
GMGenevieve Maher
Genevieve Maher
EEElizabeth G Eakin
Elizabeth G Eakin
Mobile and tablet apps, ubiquitous and pervasive computing, wearable computing and domotics for health.

1 November 2015 in American Journal of Health Promotion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAna Goode
Ana Goode
EWElisabeth A. H. Winkler
Elisabeth A. H. Winkler
MRMarina M Reeves
Marina M Reeves
EEElizabeth G. Eakin
Elizabeth G. Eakin
Purpose.: To examine associations of intervention dose with weight, physical activity, glycemic control, and diet outcomes in a randomized trial of a telephone counseling intervention. Design.: Study design was a secondary analysis of intervention group. Setting.: Study setting was primary care practices in a disadvantaged community in Australia. Subjects.: Participants were adult patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 151). Intervention.: Up to 27 telephone counseling calls were made during 18 months. Measures.: Intervention dose was assessed as the number of calls completed (in tertile categories). Primary outcomes were weight and HbA1c, and moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity via accelerometer. Secondary outcomes were dietary energy intake and diet quality via a validated questionnaire. Analysis.: Analyses employed were bivariate associations of call completion with sociodemographics, and confounder-adjusted linear mixed models for associations of call completion with outcomes (multiple imputation of missing data). Results.: Only previous diagnosis of depression/anxiety had a statistically significant (p= .008) association with call completion. Call completion was significantly associated with weight loss (p < .001) but not the other outcomes (p > .05). Relative to low call completion, mean weight loss (as a percentage of baseline weight) was greater in the high–call completion group by −3.3% (95% confidence interval, −5.0% to −1.5%). Conclusion.: Increased dose of intervention was associated with greater weight loss. More needs to be done to retain patients for the duration of weight loss and behavior change interventions, particularly those with diabetes and comorbid depression, who were the most difficult to engage.