Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky

Prof. Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky

Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Moskva, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 March 2003 in Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlexander I. Archakov
Alexander I. Archakov
VGVadim M. Govorun
Vadim M. Govorun
ADAlexander V. Dubanov
Alexander V. Dubanov
YIYuri D. Ivanov
Yuri D. Ivanov
AVAlexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
PJPaul Janssen
Paul Janssen
Protein‐protein interactions play a central role in numerous processes in the cell and are one of the main fields of functional proteomics. This review highlights the methods of bioinformatics and functional proteomics of protein‐protein interaction investigation. The structures and properties of contact surfaces, forces involved in protein‐protein interactions, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of these reactions were considered. The properties of protein contact surfaces depend on their functions. The contact surfaces of permanent complexes resemble domain contacts or the protein core and it is reasonable to consider such complex formation as a continuation of protein folding. Characteristics of contact surfaces of temporary protein complexes share some similarities with active sites of enzymes. The contact surfaces of the temporary protein complexes have unique structure and properties and they are more conservative in comparison with active site of enzymes. So they represent prospective targets for a new generation of drugs. During the last decade, numerous investigations were undertaken to find or design small molecules that block protein dimerization or protein(peptide)‐receptor interaction, or, on the contrary, to induce protein dimerization.

1 November 2002 in Journal of Molecular Recognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AVAlexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
YIYu. D. Ivanov
Yu. D. Ivanov
AIAlexis Ivanov
Alexis Ivanov
AAA. I. Archakov
A. I. Archakov
PLP. Lewi
P. Lewi
PJP. Janssen
P. Janssen

1 March 2003 in Current Drug Targets - Infectious Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AVAlexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
AIAlexis Ivanov
Alexis Ivanov
Modern strategies of computer-aided drug design (CADD) are reviewed. The task of CADD in the pipeline of drug discovery is accelerating of finding the new lead compounds and their structure optimization for the following pharmacological tests. The main directions in CADD are based on the availability of the experimentally determined three-dimensional structure of the target macromolecule. If spatial structure is known the methods of structure-based drug design are used. In the opposite case the indirect methods of CADD based on the structures of known ligands (ligand-based drug design) are used. The interrelationship between the main directions of CADD is reviewed. The main CADD approaches of molecule de novo design and database mining are described. They include methods of molecular docking, de novo design, design of pharmacophore and quantity structure-activity relationship models. New ways and perspectives of CADD are discussed.

11 December 2019 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAlexey Egorov
Alexey Egorov
MRMaya Rubtsova
Maya Rubtsova
VGVitaly G. Grigorenko
Vitaly G. Grigorenko
IUIgor Uporov
Igor Uporov
AVAlexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Bacterial resistance to β-lactams, the most commonly used class of antibiotics, poses a global challenge. This resistance is caused by the production of bacterial enzymes that are termed β-lactamases (βLs). The evolution of serine-class A β-lactamases from penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) is related to the formation of the Ω-loop at the entrance to the enzyme’s active site. In this loop, the Glu166 residue plays a key role in the two-step catalytic cycle of hydrolysis. This residue in TEM–type β-lactamases, together with Asn170, is involved in the formation of a hydrogen bonding network with a water molecule, leading to the deacylation of the acyl–enzyme complex and the hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring of the antibiotic. The activity exhibited by the Ω-loop is attributed to the positioning of its N-terminal residues near the catalytically important residues of the active site. The structure of the Ω-loop of TEM-type β-lactamases is characterized by low mutability, a stable topology, and structural flexibility. All of the revealed features of the Ω-loop, as well as the mechanisms related to its involvement in catalysis, make it a potential target for novel allosteric inhibitors of β-lactamases.

21 May 2018 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Olga TarasovaOlga Tarasova
Olga Tarasova
Vladimir Vassilievich PoroikovVladimir Vassilievich Poroikov
Vladimir Vassilievich Poroikov
AVAlexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Currently, millions of people are living with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. However, the spread of the HIV-1 resistance to antiviral agents is the major problem in the antiretroviral therapy and medical management of HIV-infected patients. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) is one of the key viral targets for HIV-1 inhibition. Therefore, the studies on the combatting the HIV resistance that occurs due to the structural changes in RT, are in great demand. This work aims to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art molecular docking approaches applied to the studies of the HIV-1 resistance, associated with RT structure changes. We have reviewed recent studies using molecular docking with mutant forms of RT. The work discusses the modifications of molecular docking, which have been developed to find the novel molecules active against resistance mutants of RT and/or recombinant strains of HIV-1. The perspectives of the existing algorithms of molecular docking to the studies on molecular mechanisms of resistance and selection of the correct binding poses for the reverse transcriptase inhibitors are discussed.

14 April 2022 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Haytham O. TawfikHaytham O. Tawfik
Haytham O. Tawfik
Anwar A. El-HamakyAnwar A. El-Hamaky
Anwar A. El-Hamaky
EEEman El-Bastawissy
Eman El-Bastawissy
KSKirill A. Shcherbakov
Kirill A. Shcherbakov
AVAlexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
Alexander Vladimirovich Veselovsky
MEMervat Hamed El-Hamamsy
Mervat Hamed El-Hamamsy
Telomeres serve a critical function in cell replication and proliferation at every stage of the cell cycle. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein, responsible for maintaining the telomere length and chromosomal integrity of frequently dividing cells. Although it is silenced in most human somatic cells, telomere restoration occurs in cancer cells because of telomerase activation or alternative telomere lengthening. The telomerase enzyme is a universal anticancer target that is expressed in 85–95% of cancers. BIBR1532 is a selective non-nucleoside potent telomerase inhibitor that acts by direct noncompetitive inhibition. Relying on its structural features, three different series were designed, and 30 novel compounds were synthesized and biologically evaluated as telomerase inhibitors using a telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay. Target compounds 29a, 36b, and 39b reported the greatest inhibitory effect on telomerase enzyme with IC50 values of 1.7, 0.3, and 2.0 μM, respectively, while BIBR1532 displayed IC50 = 0.2 μM. Compounds 29a, 36b, and 39b were subsequently tested using a living-cell TRAP assay and were able to penetrate the cell membrane and inhibit telomerase inside living cancer cells. Compound 36b was tested for cytotoxicity against 60 cancer cell lines using the NCI (USA) procedure, and the % growth was minimally impacted, indicating telomerase enzyme selectivity. To investigate the interaction of compound 36b with the telomerase allosteric binding site, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were used.