Monoclonal antibodies that target amyloid-beta (Aβ) have the potential to slow cognitive and functional decline in persons with early Alzheimer's disease. Gantenerumab is a subcutaneously administered, fully human, anti-Aβ IgG1 monoclonal antibody with highest affinity for aggregated Aβ that has been tested for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. We conducted two phase 3 trials (GRADUATE I and II) involving participants 50 to 90 years of age with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease and evidence of amyloid plaques on positron-emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing. Participants were randomly assigned to receive gantenerumab or placebo every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the score on the Clinical Dementia Rating scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB; range, 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment) at week 116. A total of 985 and 980 participants were enrolled in the GRADUATE I and II trials, respectively. The baseline CDR-SB score was 3.7 in the GRADUATE I trial and 3.6 in the GRADUATE II trial. The change from baseline in the CDR-SB score at week 116 was 3.35 with gantenerumab and 3.65 with placebo in the GRADUATE I trial (difference, -0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.66 to 0.05; P = 0.10) and was 2.82 with gantenerumab and 3.01 with placebo in the GRADUATE II trial (difference, -0.19; 95% CI, -0.55 to 0.17; P = 0.30). At week 116, the difference in the amyloid level on PET between the gantenerumab group and the placebo group was -66.44 and -56.46 centiloids in the GRADUATE I and II trials, respectively, and amyloid-negative status was attained in 28.0% and 26.8% of the participants receiving gantenerumab in the two trials. Across both trials, participants receiving gantenerumab had lower CSF levels of phosphorylated tau 181 and higher levels of Aβ42 than those receiving placebo; the accumulation of aggregated tau on PET was similar in the two groups. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema (ARIA-E) occurred in 24.9% of the participants receiving gantenerumab, and symptomatic ARIA-E occurred in 5.0%. Among persons with early Alzheimer's disease, the use of gantenerumab led to a lower amyloid plaque burden than placebo at 116 weeks but was not associated with slower clinical decline. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; GRADUATE I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03444870 and NCT03443973, respectively.).

Purpose: Describe clinical characteristics and outcome of Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS)‐associated osteosarcomas. Methods: TP53 germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant carriers diagnosed with osteosarcoma in France between 1980 and 2019 were identified via the French Li–Fraumeni database at Rouen University Hospital. Sixty‐five osteosarcomas in 52 patients with available clinical and histological data were included. The main clinical characteristics were compared with data from National Cancer Institute's SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) for patients of the same age group. Results: Median age at first osteosarcoma diagnosis was 13.7 years (range: 5.9–36.7). Compared to unselected osteosarcomas, LFS‐associated osteosarcomas occurred more frequently in patients less than 10 years of age (23% vs. 9%), and when compared with osteosarcomas in patients less than 25 years were characterized by an excess of axial (16% vs. 10%) and jaw sites (15% vs. 3%) and histology with predominant chondroblastic component and periosteal subtypes (17% vs. 1%). Metastases incidence (25%) was as expected in osteosarcomas. After the first osteosarcoma treatment, the rate of good histologic response (62%) and the 5‐year progression‐free survival (55%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.6−71.1) were as expected in unselected series of osteosarcomas, whereas the 5‐year event‐free survival was 36.5% [95% CI: 25.3−52.7] due to the high incidence of second malignancies reaching a 10‐year cumulative risk of 43.4% [95% CI: 28.5−57.5]. Conclusion: In osteosarcoma, young age at diagnosis, axial and jaw sites, histology with periosteal or chondroblastic subtype, and synchronous multifocal tumors should prompt suspicion of a germline TP53 mutation. Standard treatments are effective, but multiple malignancies impair prognosis. Early recognition of these patients is crucial for tailored therapy and follow‐up.

Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare and aggressive pediatric cancer. Numerous studies have attempted to identify new prognostic biomarkers. The predictive value of serum LDH and CRP has not been clearly described, to date. Methods: The objective of our retrospective study was to investigate the prognostic value of LDH and CRP levels and their association with overall survival in a series of ES patients. Results: Between 2004 and 2019, 89 ES patients were included. In a univariable analysis, high levels of LDH and CRP were associated with the worst prognosis. In a multivariable analysis, only higher LDH values remained associated with a lower survival. The high-LDH-level group experienced all 21 deaths registered in our population (24%) and about 90% of disease progressions. The 5-year overall survival was 66.4% in the high-LDH-level group, while no deaths were observed in the low-LDH-level group. The 5-year progression-free survival was 57.9% in the high-LDH-level group versus 80.4% in the low-LDH-level group. Conclusions: In our study, LDH levels at diagnosis were strongly correlated with the prognosis, and they might be considered a prognostic factor in Ewing sarcoma. The LDH value, along with its very low cost and its reproducibility in almost all centers, make it suitable as a potential prognostic biomarker in clinical practice.

Background/Aims: In oncology, new combined treatments make it difficult to order dose levels according to monotonically increasing toxicity. New flexible dose-finding designs that take into account uncertainty in dose levels ordering were compared with classical designs through simulations in the setting of the monotonicity assumption violation. We give recommendations for the choice of dose-finding design. Methods: Motivated by a clinical trial for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, we considered designs that require a monotonicity assumption, the Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method, the modified Toxicity Probability Interval, the Bayesian Optimal Interval design, and designs that relax monotonicity assumption, the Bayesian Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Method and the No Monotonicity Assumption design. We considered 15 scenarios including monotonic and non-monotonic dose–toxicity relationships among six dose levels. Results: The No Monotonicity Assumption and Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Method designs were robust to the violation of the monotonicity assumption. Under non-monotonic scenarios, the No Monotonicity Assumption design selected the correct dose level more often than alternative methods on average. Under the majority of monotonic scenarios, the Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Method selected the correct dose level more often than the No Monotonicity Assumption design. Other designs were impacted by the violation of the monotonicity assumption with a proportion of correct selections below 20% in most scenarios. Under monotonic scenarios, the highest proportions of correct selections were achieved using the Continual Reassessment Method and the Bayesian Optimal Interval design (between 52.8% and 73.1%). The costs of relaxing the monotonicity assumption by the No Monotonicity Assumption design and Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Method were decreases in the proportions of correct selections under monotonic scenarios ranging from 5.3% to 20.7% and from 1.4% to 16.1%, respectively, compared with the best performing design and were higher proportions of patients allocated to toxic dose levels during the trial. Conclusions: Innovative oncology treatments may no longer follow monotonic dose levels ordering which makes standard phase I methods fail. In such a setting, appropriate designs, as the No Monotonicity Assumption or Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Method designs, should be used to safely determine recommended for phase II dose.

The occurrence of cancer in newborns within the first 28 days of life is uncommon, with different clinical presentation from other age groups. Prenatal diagnosis is reported in about half of patients, while a genetic predisposition condition is supposed. The management of a newborn with cancer can be challenging and needs to be tailored according to the histology and the primary tumor site; surgery represents the main strategy, while chemotherapy should be considered with caution because of the higher toxicity and mortality due to different pharmacokinetics in neonates compared to older children. We describe the first Italian series over a 15-year period of patients affected by both benign and malignant neoplastic diseases diagnosed within the first 28 days of life; 74 newborns were diagnosed with neonatal tumors, representing 1.5% of the cancer population in the same period, and a prevalence of germ cell tumors (55%) and neuroblastoma (16%) was observed. Surgery was performed on 80% of patients, while chemotherapy was necessary for about 20% of patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) exceeded 90%; treatment-related deaths are a major concern, representing 80% of overall deaths. A genetic/syndromic condition was detected in 16% of the population; additionally, a cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) was identified in about 10% of patients. According to our experience, all newborns affected by cancer should warrant genetic counselling and a screening test for CPS.