Cannabis or its derivatives are widely used by patients with cancer to help with cancer symptoms and treatment side effects. However, cannabis has potent immunomodulatory properties. To determine if cannabis consumption during immunotherapy affects therapy outcomes, we conducted a prospective observatory study including 102 (68 immunotherapy and 34 immunotherapy plus cannabis) consecutive patients with advanced cancers who initiated immunotherapy. Cannabis consumption correlated with a significant decrease in time to tumor progression and overall survival. On the other hand, the use of cannabis reduced therapy-related immune-related adverse events. We also tested the possibility that cannabis may affect the immune system or the tumor microenvironment through the alteration of the endocannabinoid system. We analyzed a panel of serum endocannabinoids (eCBs) and eCB-like lipids, measuring their levels before and after immunotherapy in both groups. Levels of serum eCBs and eCB-like lipids, before immunotherapy, showed no significant differences between cannabis users to nonusers. Nevertheless, the levels of four eCB and eCB-like compounds were associated with patients’ overall survival time. Collectively, cannabis consumption has considerable immunomodulatory effects, and its use among cancer patients needs to be carefully considered due to its potential effects on the immune system, especially during treatment with immunotherapy.

Introduction: A flowering plant of variegated ingredients and psychoactive qualities, Cannabis has long been used for medicinal and recreational purposes. Regulatory approvals have been gained across a broad range of palliative and therapeutic indications, and in some cases, included in standard treatment guidelines. Areas covered: The use of Cannabis and cannabinoid-based-medicines in oncology is summarized in this article. Cannabinoids were classified according to natural and synthetic subtypes and their mechanisms of action expounded. The variability of available products is discussed in the clinical context and data regarding chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, cancer-related pain, anorexia, insomnia and anxiety are presented. Moreover, immunological and antineoplastic effects in preclinical and clinical trials are addressed. Concepts such as synergism or opposition with conventional treatment modalities, sequence of administration and dosage, molecular cross-talk and malignancy-cannabinoid congruence, are explored. Finally, side-effects, limitations in trial design and legislation barriers are related. Expert opinion: Sufficient evidence supports use of Cannabis for palliative indications in oncology, however, patients should be carefully selected, guided and followed. Promising research suggests potent antineoplastic activity, but more data must be accrued before conclusions can be drawn.

Checkpoint inhibitors effectively enhance the natural immune response against cancer, but they are also known to induce a unique spectrum of immune-related adverse events. Here, we report the first case of isolated neutropenia subsequent to nivolumab therapy. Prominent activated T-cells were found in the patient’s serum and bone marrow alongside evidence of maturational defects in neutrophil precursors. Antineutrophil antibodies were not detected despite reliable testing techniques. A T-cell-mediated response is probable, consistent with the established mechanism for the development of other immune-related toxicities. Awareness of this rare and severe side effect reinforces the importance of early diagnosis and prompt initiation of proper treatment.

The existing data with regard to immune-related neutropenia (irN), a rare (incidence—1%) immune-related adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors, are scarce. Eight patients with irN were identified through internal databases of 3 participating Israeli cancer centers. In addition, 11 original articles focusing on the clinical course of 24 patients with irN were selected during the PubMed search. Descriptive analysis of clinical and pathologic factors related to irN was performed (n=32); the effect of these on the irN outcomes was assessed. An algorithm for irN evaluation and treatment was proposed. The median time-to-onset of irN (n=32) was 60 days (range, 10–465 d). Grade 3–5 irN, febrile neutropenia, and irN-related death occurred in 81%, 50%, and 9% of patients, respectively. In all, 56%, 22%, 62%, and 25% of patients received PO corticosteroids, IV corticosteroids, granulocyte colony–stimulating factor (GCSF), and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), respectively, with an improvement/resolution rate of 84%. Odds ratios for irN improvement/resolution were as follows: 1.40 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03–68.72], 0.43 (95% CI, 0.04–4.22), 2.60 (95% CI, 0.07–97.24), 0.36 (95% CI, 0.03–4.38), 4.02 (95% CI, 0.16–99.48), 2.01 (95% CI, 0.32–12.70), 1.08 (95% CI, 0.02–49.89), 0.42 (95% CI, 0.06–2.91), and 2.73 (95% CI, 0.42–17.51) for granulocyte hyperplasia, granulocyte/all lineage hypoplasia, granulocyte maturation blockade, lymphocyte infiltration on bone marrow biopsy, IV corticosteroids, PO corticosteroids, cyclosporine, IVIG, and GCSF, respectively (P>0.05 for all factors). IrN recurrence rate following immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge was 80%. IrN is a rare, life-threatening, early-onset immune-related adverse event. Differentiating between the central, peripheral, and modified peripheral types allows a better prognosis definition. Corticosteroids and GCSF represent the main treatment approaches; IVIG and cyclosporine should be used as salvage treatment.

Introduction Digital social networks have become a key player in the ecosystem of young patients with cancer, with regard to their unique perspectives and unmet needs. This study aims to investigate the web-based social community tools and to characterise the user profile, unmet needs and goals of young patients with cancer. Methods A web-based survey was distributed via large-scale social network designated for young patients with cancer (age 18–45 years) Stop Cancer. The survey collected demographic data and oncological status. Primary outcome was potential goals of accessing the network; secondary outcomes were emotional impact, effect of disease status, education, marital status and employment, on user satisfaction rate. Results The survey was available for 5 days (10/2018) and was filled by 523 participants. Breast cancer, haematological malignancies and colorectal cancer were the most common diagnoses. The majority had non-metastatic disease at diagnosis, 79% had no evidence of disease at time of the survey. Forty-five per cent considered the network as a reliable source for medical information. Academic education was associated with higher satisfaction from the platform. There were no differences between cancer survivors and patients with active disease in patterns of platform usage. The social network had an allocated section for ‘patient mentoring’ of newly diagnosed members by survivors. Discussion Our study portrayed the user prototype of a social digital network among young adult patients with cancer, indicating challenging trends. Whereas social media may prove a powerful tool for patients and physicians alike, it may also serve as a research tool to appraise wide practices within a heterogeneous population. Nevertheless, it acts as a double-edged sword in the setting of uncontrolled medical information. It is our role as healthcare providers to join this race and play an active role in shaping its medical perspectives.