Background: All the peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are found to be expressed in bone cells. The PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone has been shown to decrease bone mass in mice and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have recently been found to increase bone loss and fracture risk in humans treated for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of the PPARα agonist fenofibrate (FENO) and the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone (PIO) on bone in intact female rats. Methods: Rats were given methylcellulose (vehicle), fenofibrate or pioglitazone (35 mg/kg body weight/day) by gavage for 4 months. BMC, BMD, and body composition were measured by DXA. Histomorphometry and biomechanical testing of excised femurs were performed. Effects of the compounds on bone cells were studied. Results: The FENO group had higher femoral BMD and smaller medullary area at the distal femur; while trabecular bone volume was similar to controls. Whole body BMD, BMC, and trabecular bone volume were lower, while medullary area was increased in PIO rats compared to controls. Ultimate bending moment and energy absorption of the femoral shafts were reduced in the PIO group, while similar to controls in the FENO group. Plasma osteocalcin was higher in the FENO group than in the other groups. FENO stimulated proliferation and differentiation of, and OPG release from, the preosteoblast cell line MC3T3-E1. Conclusion: We show opposite skeletal effects of PPARα and γ agonists in intact female rats. FENO resulted in significantly higher femoral BMD and lower medullary area, while PIO induced bone loss and impairment of the mechanical strength. This represents a novel effect of PPARα activation.

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma is associated with bone loss and increased fracture risk, while PPARalpha activation seems to have positive skeletal effects. To further explore these effects we have examined the effect of the PPARalpha agonists fenofibrate and Wyeth 14643, and the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone, on bone mineral density (BMD), bone architecture and biomechanical strength in ovariectomized rats.

Context and objectives Low birth weight (LBW) has emerged as a risk factor of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Whether very low birth weight (VLBW) adults born preterm are at higher risk than term-born small for gestational age (tb-SGA) individuals is not established. We assessed metabolic outcomes, including relation with skeletal parameters, in these two LBW categories. Design, participants and outcomes This follow-up cohort study included 189 individuals (females 51%), 25 to 28 years; 55 preterm VLBW (≤1500g), 59 tb-SGA (<10^th percentile), and 75 controls (>10^th percentile). Outcomes were indices of MetS: blood pressure (BP), waist circumference, fasting glucose, lipid profile, and association between calculated MetS score and bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS), a measure of bone quality. Results Compared with controls, VLBW individuals displayed higher systolic [mean (SD) 126 (13.3) vs 119 (12.3), 95% CI 1.27, 11.48 mm Hg] and diastolic [71.9 (7.6), vs 68.6 (7.1), CI 0.3, 6.2 mm Hg] BP, higher glycated hemoglobin, higher C-peptide, increased insulin resistance (Homeostatic Model Assessment 2), and lower HDL-cholesterol [1.34 (0.3) vs 1.50 (0.4), CI 0.32, 0.01]. Significant differences were mainly seen between VLBW females and control females. Tb-SGA adults had higher waist circumference, and higher total and LDL-cholesterol compared with controls. In males, MetS score correlated positively with BMD and inversely with TBS. Conclusions The LBW groups, and preferentially females in the VLBW group displayed a less favorable metabolic profile than did controls. The inverse association between MetS score and bone quality suggests enhanced future fracture risk.

In observational studies, vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for low bone density and future fractures, whereas a causal relation has been difficult to show in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Similarly, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased bone turnover, but RCTs with vitamin D have not shown conclusive effects. This could be due to inclusion of vitamin D sufficient subjects and low vitamin D doses. In the present study 399 subjects with mean baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) 34.0 nmol/L completed a four months intervention with vitamin D3 20,000 IU per week versus placebo. Mean serum 25(OH)D increased to 89.0 nmol/L in the vitamin D group and decreased slightly in the placebo group. A small, but significant, decrease in the bone formation marker procollagen of type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) was seen in the vitamin D group as compared to the placebo group (mean delta P1NP -1.2 pg/mL and 1.5 ng/mL, respectively, P < 0.01). No significant effects were seen on serum carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX-1), Dickkopf-1, sclerostin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of nuclear factor ĸB ligand, or leptin. Subgroup analyses on subjects with low baseline serum 25(OH)D did not yield additional, significant results. In subjects with high baseline serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) > 6.5 pmol/L and post-intervention decrease in PTH, the decrease in P1NP was more pronounced, they also exhibited significantly reduced serum CTX-1 and increased serum sclerostin. In conclusion, supplementation with vitamin D appears to suppress bone turnover, possibly mediated by PTH reduction. Our findings need to be confirmed in even larger cohorts with vitamin D insufficient subjects.

Objective: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with substantial fracture risk. Bone mineral density (BMD) is, however, only modestly reduced, suggesting impaired bone microarchitecture and/or bone material properties. Yet, the skeletal abnormalities have not been uncovered. Men with T1D seem to experience a more pronounced bone loss than their female counterparts. Hence, we aimed to examine different aspects of bone quality in men with T1D. Design and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, men with T1D and healthy male controls were enrolled. BMD (femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine, whole body) and spine trabecular bone score (TBS) were measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry, and bone material strength index (BMSi) was measured by in vivo impact microindentation. HbA_1c and bone turnover markers were analyzed. Results: Altogether, 33 men with T1D (43 ± 12 years) and 28 healthy male controls (42 ± 12 years) were included. Subjects with T1D exhibited lower whole-body BMD than controls (P = 0.04). TBS and BMSi were attenuated in men with T1D vs controls (P = 0.016 and P = 0.004, respectively), and T1D subjects also had a lower bone turnover. The bone parameters did not differ between subjects with or without diabetic complications. Duration of disease correlated negatively with femoral neck BMD but not with TBS or BMSi. Conclusions: This study revealed compromised bone material strength and microarchitecture in men with T1D. Moreover, our data confirm previous studies which found a modest decrease in BMD and low bone turnover in subjects with T1D. Accordingly, bone should be recognized as a target of diabetic complications.