PURPOSE: Combination of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) plus anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (anti-CTLA-4) immunotherapy shows greater response rates (RRs) than anti-PD-1 antibody alone in melanoma, but RR after initial anti-PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody progression awaits robust investigation. Anti-CTLA-4 antibody alone after anti-PD-1/L1 antibody progression has a historical RR of 13%. We report the results of the first prospective clinical trial evaluating ipilimumab 1 mg/kg plus pembrolizumab following progression on anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced melanoma who had progressed on anti-PD-1/L1 antibody as immediate prior therapy (including non–anti-CTLA-4 antibody combinations) were eligible. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy. The primary end point was RR by irRECIST. After 35 patients, the trial met the primary end point and was expanded to enroll a total of 70 patients to better estimate the RR. RESULTS: Prior treatments included 60 on anti-PD-1 antibody alone and 10 on anti-PD-1/L1 antibody–based combinations. Thirteen patients had progressed in the adjuvant setting. The median length of prior treatment with anti-PD-1/L1 antibody was 4.8 months. Response assessments included five complete and 15 partial responses, making the irRECIST RR 29% among the entire trial population. The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months, and the median overall survival was 24.7 months. The median duration of response was 16.6 months. There was no difference in median time on prior anti-PD1/L1 or time to PD1 + CTLA4 initiation between responders and nonresponders. Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events occurred in 27% of patients. Responses occurred in PD-L1–negative, non-T-cell–inflamed, and intermediate tumor phenotypes. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus low-dose ipilimumab after anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy failure, demonstrating significant antitumor activity and tolerability.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved overall survival for cancer patients, however, optimal duration of ICI therapy has yet to be defined. Given ICIs were first used to treat patients with metastatic melanoma, a condition that at the time was incurable, little attention was initially paid to how much therapy would be needed for a durable response. As the early immunotherapy trials have matured past 10 years, a significant per cent of patients have demonstrated durable responses; it is now time to determine whether patients have been overtreated, and if durable remissions can still be achieved with less therapy, limiting the physical and financial toxicity associated with years of treatment. Well-designed trials are needed to identify optimal duration of therapy, and to define biomarkers to predict who would benefit from shorter courses of immunotherapy. Here, we outline key questions related to health, financial and societal toxicities of over treating with ICI and present four unique clinical trials aimed at exposing criteria for early cessation of ICI. Taken together, there is a serious liability to overtreating patients with ICI and future work is warranted to determine when it is safe to stop ICI.

Immune checkpoint blockade is therapeutically successful for many patients across multiple cancer types. However, immune-related adverse events (irAE) frequently occur and can sometimes be life threatening. It is critical to understand the immunologic mechanisms of irAEs with the goal of finding novel treatment targets. Herein, we report our analysis of tissues from patients with irAE dermatitis using multiparameter immunofluorescence (IF), spatial transcriptomics, and RNA in situ hybridization (RISH). Skin psoriasis cases were studied as a comparison, as a known Th17-driven disease, and colitis was investigated as a comparison. IF analysis revealed that CD4+ and CD8+ tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells were preferentially expanded in the inflamed portion of skin in cutaneous irAEs compared with healthy skin controls. Spatial transcriptomics allowed us to focus on areas containing TRM cells to discern functional phenotype and revealed expression of Th1-associated genes in irAEs, compared with Th17-asociated genes in psoriasis. Expression of PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and other inhibitory receptors was observed in irAE cases. RISH technology combined with IF confirmed expression of IFNγ, CXCL9, CXCL10, and TNFα in irAE dermatitis, as well as IFNγ within TRM cells specifically. The Th1-skewed phenotype was confirmed in irAE colitis cases compared with healthy colon.

The long-term benefits demonstrated by immunotherapy in select tumors have failed to generalize to most nonhematologic solid tumors. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT)—a treatment on the basis of the isolation and engineering of living T cells and other immune cells—has shown early clinical advances. ACT, through tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, has shown activity in traditionally immunogenic tumors such as melanoma and cervical cancers, and has the potential to improve immune reactivity in these tumor types where traditional therapies have failed. Engineered T-cell receptor and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies have also shown activity in select nonhematologic solid tumors. Through receptor engineering, and improved understanding of tumor antigens, these therapies have the potential to target poorly immunogenic tumors to deliver long-lasting responses. Additionally, non–T-cell therapies such as natural killer–cell therapy may allow for allogeneic forms of ACT. Each form of ACT has trade-offs that will likely limit their application to specific clinical settings. Key challenges with ACT include the logistical challenges of manufacturing, accurate antigen identification, and the risk of on-target, off-tumor toxicity. The successes of ACT are built on decades of advances in cancer immunology, antigen identification, and cell engineering. With continued refinements in these processes, ACT may extend the benefits of immunotherapy to more patients with advanced nonhematologic solid tumors. Herein, we review the major forms of ACT, their successes, and strategies to overcome the trade-offs of current ACTs.

In a T-cell-inflamed phenotype, tumor eradication works best and is potentiated by immunotherapy such as checkpoint blockade. However, a majority of patients die despite receiving immunotherapy. One reason is insufficient T cell priming and infiltration in the tumor. Nature provides us with innate immune mechanisms in T-cell-inflamed tumors that we can adopt for more personalized immunotherapy strategies. Tumor sensing through innate signaling pathways and efficient antigen-presenting possess a significant role in bridging innate and adaptive immunity and generating a T-cell-inflamed tumor. One approach to strengthen these innate immune mechanisms is to deliver innate immune factors such as STING or activated DCs into the tumor microenvironment, in particular in patients resistant to checkpoint blockade. The low number of DCs in the tumor bed could potentially be increased with the growth factor FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L). CD103+ DCs are integral for three phases of anti-tumor immunity: priming, recruiting, and re-invigoration of effector T cells. Re-activation of dysfunctional T cells is achieved via co-stimulatory molecules such as the 4-1BB ligand. The presence of myeloid-cell-derived CXCL9 and CXCL10 in the tumor microenvironment can predict response to immunotherapy. We outline recent preclinical and clinical approaches to deliver these crucial components bridging innate and adaptive immunity into the tumor microenvironment.

Background: Patients with cancer were excluded from phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials, and the immunogenicity and side effect profiles of these vaccines in this population is not well understood. Patients with cancer can be immunocompromised from chemotherapy, corticosteroids, or the cancer itself, which may affect cellular and/or humoral responses to vaccination. PD-1 is expressed on T effector cells, T follicular helper cells and B cells, leading us to hypothesize that anti-PD-1 immunotherapies may augment antibody or T cell generation after vaccination.Methods: Antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and spike protein were assessed in patients with cancer (n=118) and healthy donors (HD, n=22) after 1, 2 or 3 mRNA vaccine doses. CD4⁺and CD8⁺T cell reactivity to wild-type (WT) or B.1.617.2 (delta) spike peptides was measured by intracellular cytokine staining.Results: Oncology patients without prior COVID-19 infections receiving immunotherapy (n=36), chemotherapy (n=15), chemoimmunotherapy (n=6), endocrine or targeted therapies (n=6) and those not on active treatment (n=26) had similar RBD and Spike IgG antibody titers to HDs after two vaccinations. Contrary to our hypothesis, PD-1 blockade did not augment antibody titers or T cell responses. Patients receiving B-cell directed therapies (n=14) including anti-CD20 antibodies and multiple myeloma therapies had decreased antibody titers, and 9/14 of these patients were seronegative for RBD antibodies. No differences were observed in WT spike-reactive CD4⁺and CD8⁺T cell generation between treatment groups. 11/13 evaluable patients seronegative for RBD had a detectable WT spike-reactive CD4⁺T cell response. T cells cross-reactive against the B.1.617.2 variant spike peptides were detected in 31/59 participants. Two patients with prior immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adrenal insufficiency had symptomatic hypoadrenalism after vaccination.Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccinations are safe and immunogenic in patients with solid tumors, who developed similar antibody and T cell responses compared with HDs. Patients on B-cell directed therapies may fail to generate RBD antibodies after vaccination and should be considered for prophylactic antibody treatments. Many seronegative patients do develop a T cell response, which may have an anti-viral effect. Patients with pre-existing adrenal insufficiency may need to take stress dose steroids during vaccination to avoid adrenal crisis.