Shimon Ginath

Dr. Shimon Ginath

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2012 in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGShimon Ginath
Shimon Ginath
ASAmir Shalev
Amir Shalev
RKRan Keidar
Ran Keidar
RKRam Kerner
Ram Kerner
ACAlexander Condrea
Alexander Condrea
RSRon Sagiv
Ron Sagiv

28 April 2017 in Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SGShimon Ginath
Shimon Ginath
YMYossi Mizrachi
Yossi Mizrachi
JBJacob Bar
Jacob Bar
ACAlexander Condrea
Alexander Condrea
MKMichal Kovo
Michal Kovo
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) following vaginal deliveries are the main reason for subsequent development of anal incontinence in women. The diagnosis of such tears is crucial for treating and preventing such a grave sequela. The reported rate of OASIs in Israel was between 0.1% and 0.6%, out of all vaginal births, which is 10-fold lower than that reported in Europe and the United States. Structured hands-on training in repair of OASIs in seven medical centers in Israel significantly increased the detection rate of third-degree perineal tears. The implementation of such programs is crucial for increasing awareness and detection rates of OASIs following vaginal deliveries.

23 August 2016 in The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OGOhad Gluck
Ohad Gluck
YMYossi Mizrachi
Yossi Mizrachi
SGShimon Ginath
Shimon Ginath
JBJacob Bar
Jacob Bar
RSRon Sagiv
Ron Sagiv
Objective: To study obstetric outcomes of emergency cerclage compared with elective cerclage. Study design: Retrospective cohort study of pregnancy outcomes of patients who underwent cervical cerclage, performed according to ACOG guidelines, between January 2006 and December 2014. Patients who underwent emergency cerclage, due to cervical shortening or cervical dilation (emergency cerclage group) were compared with patients who underwent history-indicated cerclage (elective cerclage group). Emergency cerclage was not performed in patients with uterine contractions, vaginal bleeding, or signs of chorioamnionitis. Procedure-related complications were defined as rupture of membranes or chorioamnionitis occurring after cerclage placement and before 24 weeks of gestation. Results: Overall, 154 patients with elective cerclage and 47 patients with emergency cerclage were included. Mean gestational age at cerclage operation was 13.1 ± 1 and 20.2 ± 3 weeks, respectively. There were no differences between the emergency cerclage group and the elective cerclage group regarding mean gestational age at delivery (36.1 ± 3 versus 35.6 ± 3, respectively, p = 0.7), rate of deliveries beyond 34 weeks of gestation (81.81% versus 78.72%, respectively, p = 0.67), rate of deliveries beyond 37 weeks of gestation (64.93% versus 59.57%, respectively, p = 0.6), cesarean deliveries (33.11% versus 39.13%, p = 0.48, respectively), or birthweight (2848 versus 2862 grams, respectively, p = 0.9). Regarding procedure-related complications, there were no differences between the elective and the emergency cerclage groups in the rate of chorioamnionitis (1.29% versus 4.34%, respectively, p = 0.22), or ruptured membranes (1.29% versus 4.34%, respectively, p = 0.22). Conclusion: Pregnancy outcomes of emergency cerclage are comparable with those of elective cerclage.

15 February 2017 in Birth
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YMYossi Mizrachi
Yossi Mizrachi
SLSophia Leytes
Sophia Leytes
MLMichal Levy
Michal Levy
ZHZvia Hiaev
Zvia Hiaev
SGShimon Ginath
Shimon Ginath
MKMichal Kovo
Michal Kovo

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElad Barber
Elad Barber
Michal KovoMichal Kovo
Michal Kovo
SLSophia Leytes
Sophia Leytes
RSRon Sagiv
Ron Sagiv
EWEran Weiner
Eran Weiner
SGShimon Ginath
Shimon Ginath
Objective: We aimed to investigate the likelihood of vaginal colonization with Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in pregnant and non-pregnant women with Coronavrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Materials and Methods: Vaginal swabs were taken from women diagnosed with mild to moderately acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, at Wolfson Medical Center, Israel, from March 2020 through October 2020. COVID-19 was diagnosed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) performed on nasopharyngeal swabs. Vaginal swabs were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: In total, 51 women diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in the study. Of the 51 women with COVID-19 enrolled in this study, 16 (31.4%) were pregnant at enrollment and 35 (68.6%) were non-pregnant. Mean age was 43.5 ± 15.3 years (range 21–74 years). Compared to the non-pregnant group, the pregnant group was characterized by a higher white blood cell and absolute neutrophil count (p = 0.02 and p = 0.027, respectively). The non-pregnant patients were more likely to have chronic diseases (p = 0.035) and to be hospitalized (p < 0.001). Only one patient (1.9%) aged 60 years tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in vaginal secretions. Mean gestational age at the diagnosis of COVID-19 of the pregnant group was 32.3 ± 7.8 weeks. Thirteen patients delivered during the study period; all delivered at term without obstetric complications and all neonates were healthy. Conclusions: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the vaginal secretions of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 is rare. Vaginal colonization may occur during the viremia phase of the disease, although infectivity from vaginal colonization needs to be proven.

21 June 2012 in International Urogynecology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGShimon Ginath
Shimon Ginath
AGAlan D. Garely
Alan D. Garely
ACAlexander Condrea
Alexander Condrea
MVMichael D. Vardy
Michael D. Vardy