Per Nilsson

Prof. Dr. Per Nilsson

Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82 Kalmar, Sweden
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2019 in Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ETEbbe Billmann Thorgersen
Ebbe Billmann Thorgersen
ABAndreas Barratt‐Due
Andreas Barratt‐Due
HHHåkon Haugaa
Håkon Haugaa
MHMorten Harboe
Morten Harboe
SPSøren Erik Pischke
Søren Erik Pischke
TMTom Eirik Mollnes
Tom Eirik Mollnes
The liver is both an immunologically complex and a privileged organ. The innate immune system is a central player, in which the complement system emerges as a pivotal part of liver homeostasis, immune responses, and crosstalk with other effector systems in both innate and adaptive immunity. The liver produces the majority of the complement proteins and is the home of important immune cells such as Kupffer cells. Liver immune responses are delicately tuned between tolerance to many antigens flowing in from the alimentary tract, a tolerance that likely makes the liver less prone to rejection than other solid organ transplants, and reaction to local injury, systemic inflammation, and regeneration. Notably, complement is a double‐edged sword as activation is detrimental by inducing inflammatory tissue damage in, for example, ischemia–reperfusion injury and transplant rejection yet is beneficial for liver tissue regeneration. Therapeutic complement inhibition is rapidly developing for routine clinical treatment of several diseases. In the liver, targeted inhibition of damaged tissue may be a rational and promising approach to avoid further tissue destruction and simultaneously preserve beneficial effects of complement in areas of proliferation. Here, we argue that complement is a key system to manipulate in the liver in several clinical settings, including liver injury and regeneration after major surgery and preservation of the organ during transplantation.

10 April 2017 in Nature Nanotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWPeter Popp Wibroe
Peter Popp Wibroe
AAAaron C. Anselmo
Aaron C. Anselmo
Per NilssonPer Nilsson
Per Nilsson
ASApoorva Sarode
Apoorva Sarode
Vivek GuptaVivek Gupta
Vivek Gupta
Seyed Moein MoghimiSeyed Moein Moghimi
Seyed Moein Moghimi

1 September 2011 in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KEKristina N. Ekdahl
Kristina N. Ekdahl
JLJohn D. Lambris
John D. Lambris
HEHans Elwing
Hans Elwing
DRDaniel Ricklin
Daniel Ricklin
Per NilssonPer Nilsson
Per Nilsson
BNBo Nilsson
Bo Nilsson

17 July 2008 in Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OHO. A. Hamad
O. A. Hamad
KEK. N. Ekdahl
K. N. Ekdahl
Per NilssonPer Nilsson
Per Nilsson
JAJ. Andersson
J. Andersson
PMP. Magotti
P. Magotti
BNB. Nilsson
B. Nilsson

1 November 2021 in Bioactive Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSina Sharifi
Sina Sharifi
MIMohammad Mirazul Islam
Mohammad Mirazul Islam
HSHannah Sharifi
Hannah Sharifi
RIRakibul Islam
Rakibul Islam
DKDarrell Koza
Darrell Koza
MGMiguel González-Andrades
Miguel González-Andrades
Gelatin based adhesives have been used in the last decades in different biomedical applications due to the excellent biocompatibility, easy processability, transparency, non-toxicity, and reasonable mechanical properties to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM). Gelatin adhesives can be easily tuned to gain different viscoelastic and mechanical properties that facilitate its ocular application. We herein grafted glycidyl methacrylate on the gelatin backbone with a simple chemical modification of the precursor, utilizing epoxide ring-opening reactions and visible light-crosslinking. This chemical modification allows the obtaining of an elastic protein-based hydrogel (GELGYM) with excellent biomimetic properties, approaching those of the native tissue. GELGYM can be modulated to be stretched up to 4 times its initial length and withstand high tensile stresses up to 1.95 MPa with compressive strains as high as 80% compared to Gelatin-methacryloyl (GeIMA), the most studied derivative of gelatin used as a bioadhesive. GELGYM is also highly biocompatible and supports cellular adhesion, proliferation, and migration in both 2 and 3-dimensional cell-cultures. These characteristics along with its super adhesion to biological tissues such as cornea, aorta, heart, muscle, kidney, liver, and spleen suggest widespread applications of this hydrogel in many biomedical areas such as transplantation, tissue adhesive, wound dressing, bioprinting, and drug and cell delivery.

1 March 2010 in The Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OHOsama A Hamad
Osama A Hamad
Per NilssonPer Nilsson
Per Nilsson
DWDiana Wouters
Diana Wouters
JLJohn D. Lambris
John D. Lambris
KEKristina N. Ekdahl
Kristina N. Ekdahl
BNBo Nilsson
Bo Nilsson
It has been reported that complement is activated on the surface of activated platelets, despite the presence of multiple regulators of complement activation. To reinvestigate the mechanisms by which activated platelets bind to complement components, the presence of complement proteins on the surfaces of nonactivated and thrombin receptor-activating peptide-activated platelets was analyzed by flow cytometry and Western blot analyses. C1q, C4, C3, and C9 were found to bind to thrombin receptor-activating peptide-activated platelets in lepirudin-anticoagulated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood. However, inhibiting complement activation at the C1q or C3 level did not block the binding of C3 to activated platelets. Diluting PRP and chelating divalent cations also had no effect, further indicating that the deposition of complement components was independent of complement activation. Furthermore, washed, activated platelets bound added C1q and C3 to the same extent as platelets in PRP. The use of mAbs against different forms of C3 demonstrated that the bound C3 consisted of C3(H2O). Furthermore, exogenously added soluble complement receptor 1 was shown to bind to this form of platelet-bound C3. These observations indicate that there is no complement activation on the surface of platelets under physiological conditions. This situation is in direct contrast to a number of pathological conditions in which regulators of complement activation are lacking and thrombocytopenia and thrombotic disease are the ultimate result. However, the generation of C3(H2O) represents nonproteolytic activation of C3 and after factor I cleavage may act as a ligand for receptor binding.