Late-stage Parkinson’s disease (LSPD) patients are highly dependent on activities of daily living and require significant medical needs. In LSPD, there is a significant caregiver burden and greater health economic impact compared to earlier PD stages. The clinical presentation in LSPD is dominated by motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS) that most of the time have a sub-optimal to no response to dopaminergic treatment, especially when dementia is present. Non-pharmacological interventions, including physiotherapy, cognitive stimulation, speech, occupational therapy, and a specialized PD nurse, assume a key role in LSPD to mitigate the impact of disease milestones or prevent acute clinical worsening and optimize the management of troublesome NMS. However, the feasibility of these approaches is limited by patients’ cognitive impairment and the difficulty in delivering care at home. The present care challenge for LSPD is the ability to offer a person-centered, home-delivered palliative care model based on Advanced Care Planning. An ongoing European multicentric project, PD_Pal, aims to address this challenge.

Background: Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Awareness and the evidence supporting the merits of palliative care (PC) approaches to people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) are increasing. Objective: This review aimed to address four key questions related to PC for PwPs and their caregivers: i) What are the indicators for timely access to PC? ii) When should PC be introduced? iii) What are the current care models for providing PC? iv) What are the barriers and facilitators at the organizational level? Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (2006–2024). Six reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, and thematic synthesis was applied to develop analytical themes. Reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. Results: Out of 894 studies, 70 were included. PwPs were infrequently referred to PC services, and while several referral criteria were identified, no consensus emerged. Barriers to accessing PC included insufficient information, inadequate education, difficulties determining referral timing, limited home-based care options, inconsistent provider support, and disparities linked to socioeconomic and cultural factors. Facilitators included improved care coordination and education for PwPs, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Effective PC models were identified, including home-based, hospital-based, and community-based approaches, which improved quality of life and reduced healthcare costs. Conclusions: Establishing consensus on referral timing and criteria is essential for integrating PC into Parkinson's disease care. Overcoming barriers requires enhanced education, better care coordination, and targeted interventions to address disparities, ensuring comprehensive, patient-centred care for PwPs and their caregivers.

A key distinguishing factor between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Parkinson’s disease (PD) lies in the notable decrease in functioning due to cognitive impairment. The Parkinson’s Disease-Cognitive Functional Rating Scale (PD-CRFS) was developed to assess functional limitations caused by cognitive impairment, while reducing the influence of motor impairment. The aim of this multicenter study was to (i) validate the Italian version of the PD-CFRS in PD, (ii) determine optimal cut-off scores for detecting MCI and dementia in PD, (iii) compare its performances with the most established functional assessment tool (IADL). Six hundred and sixty nine PD participants were recruited from 4 Italian Movement Disorders centers (Venice, Milan, Gravedona, and Salerno). They underwent Level-II cognitive evaluation, which resulted in 282 PD-NC, 310 PD-MCI, and 77 PDD. The PD-CFRS’s psychometric and clinimetric properties, applicability, and responsiveness were analyzed. The PD-CFRS showed high acceptability. Floor and ceiling effects were acceptable. It also displayed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.738), and test–retest reliability (ICC = .854). The PD-CFRS demonstrated higher coefficient of variation to detect dysfunction in PD-MCI patients in comparison to the IADL scale (PD-CFRS 96% vs IADL 22.5%). Convergent validity with the IADL was r = − 0.638 and − 0.527 in males and females, respectively. PD-CFRS total score negatively correlated with global cognition (MoCA corrected score r = − 0.61; p < 0.001). A cut-off score > 6.5 identified PDD with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 88% (AUC = .959). A cut-off value of > 1 detected PD-MCI with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 69% (AUC = .695). The Italian version of the PD-CFRS demonstrated to be an easy, valid and reliable tool that properly captures functional impairment due to cognitive decline in PD. It also proved to be particularly effective in the advanced stages of PD, and would be a useful support for the diagnosis of PD-MCI and PDD.

Device-aided therapies, such as levodopa-and apomorphine-based infusion pumps, are widely used for managing patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with symptoms inadequately controlled by oral medications. Cognitive impairment is a critical factor in selecting an appropriate therapy; however, the effects of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) on cognitive function remain debated. The aim of this review is twofold: i) to provide a comprehensive analysis of the short-term benefits of device-aided infusion therapies on cognitive function, and ii) to evaluate their impact on long-term cognitive trajectories. A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Narrative synthesis was applied to summarize results. Out of 1911 studies, 33 were included in this systematic review according to the selected criteria. No studies examined the effects of the newly introduced Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp) nor levodopa/entacapone/carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) pump therapy. Seventeen studies addressed the short-term effects of CSAI; seven reported cognitive slowing and two were suggestive of positive effects. Only two studies assessed its impact on long-term cognitive trajectory, showing no significant changes. Thirteen studies examined LCIG's short-term effects; seven reported cognitive changes, with some decreases in executive functions. Two studies explored its long-term cognitive impact, with one reporting improvements. The cognitive effects of device-aided treatments in PD show substantial variability, and their impact on cognitive function, processing speed, attention, and memory is inconsistent, with some studies reporting impairments and others indicating stability or slight improvements. The heterogeneity in study designs, neuropsychological assessments and coexisting vascular and amyloid pathology further complicates interpretation, underscoring the need for more controlled investigations.