Alberto Budia

Prof. Alberto Budia

Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2003 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JQJ. A. Queipo
J. A. Queipo
EBE. Broseta
E. Broseta
MSM. Santos
M. Santos
JSJ. Sánchez-Plumed
J. Sánchez-Plumed
ABAlberto Budia
Alberto Budia
FJF. Jiménez-Cruz
F. Jiménez-Cruz
To describe the incidence and clinical characteristics of mycobacterial infection in renal transplant recipients. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of mycobacterial infection in a series of 1261 renal transplants carried out in our Unit of Renal Transplantation from 1980 to 2000. Demographic parameters and clinical antecedents such as age, cause of end-stage renal disease, time of follow-up of the graft, previous renal function and type of immunosuppression were considered. Moreover, the clinical onset, diagnostic tools, treatment policy and evolution were studied. The pathogenesis of the different types of mycobacteria isolated was also analyzed. Diagnosis was made with the Ziehl-Neelsen staining method. Culture was performed by the conventional Löwenstein-Jensen method and the Bactec-460 radiometric method. We found mycobacterial infection in 27 patients (2.1%), due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 20 cases, M. kansasii in five patients, and M. fortuitum in two patients. The mean elapsed time from the renal transplant was 20.5 months; the infection appeared in 18 patients during the first eight months after transplantation. The clinical onset was pulmonary infection in 17 cases (12 M. tuberculosis and five M. kansasii); five had urinary symptoms (three M. tuberculosis and two M. fortuitum); three cases of M. tuberculosis infection had abdominal symptoms; another one began with a perineal tuberculous abscess; the rest of the patients were asymptomatic. The types of specimen on which microbiological identification was carried out were, in decreasing order: sputum and/or bronchial washing/pleural aspiration, urine, feces, gastric and peritoneal fluids, bone marrow and blood. The first-line drug isoniazid had the highest resistance index in the susceptibility test. Clinical dissemination was observed in eight patients, four of whom died. Another three patients had a significant impairment in renal function, and in one of these patients an allograft nephrectomy was necessary due to a severe septic syndrome. Mycobacterial infection, mainly by M. tuberculosis, has an important impact on kidney transplant recipients, particularly during the first year after surgery. Diagnosis often presents some difficulties, and a delay in treatment represents a determinant factor for the evolution, with a risk of death or permanent damage in renal function. Therefore, early diagnosis is mandatory. When the Mantoux reaction is positive, antituberculous prophylaxis seems advisable.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAthanasios Papatsoris
Athanasios Papatsoris
ABAlberto Budia
Alberto Budia
JGJuan A. Galán-Llopis
Juan A. Galán-Llopis
Murtadha AlmusaferMurtadha Almusafer
Murtadha Almusafer
MAMohammed Alameedee
Mohammed Alameedee
CTChristian Tuerk
Christian Tuerk
Aim: To present state of the art on the management of urinary stones from a panel of globally recognized urolithiasis experts who met during the Experts in Stone Disease Congress in Valencia in January 2024.Options of treatment: The surgical treatment modalities of renal and ureteral stones are well defined by the guidelines of international societies, although for some index cases more alternative options are possible. For 1.5 cm renal stones, both m-PCNL and RIRS have proven to be valid treatment alternatives with comparable stone-free rates. The m-PCNL has proven to be more cost effective and requires a shorter operative time, while the RIRS has demonstrated lower morbidity in terms of blood loss and shorter recovery times. SWL has proven to be less effective at least for lower calyceal stones but has the highest safety profile. For a 6mm obstructing stone of the pelviureteric junction (PUJ) stone, SWL should be the first choice for a stone less than 1 cm, due to less invasiveness and lower risk of complications although it has a lower stone free-rate. RIRS has advantages in certain conditions such as anticoagulant treatment, obesity, or body deformity.Technical issues of the surgical procedures for stone removal: In patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, SWL, PCN and open surgery are at elevated risk of hemorrhage or perinephric hematoma. URS, is associated with less morbidity in these cases. An individualized combined evaluation of risks of bleeding and thromboembolism should determine the perioperative thromboprophylactic strategy. Pre-interventional urine culture and antibiotic therapy are mandatory although UTI treatment is becoming more challenging due to increasing resistance to routinely applied antibiotics. The use of an intrarenal urine culture and stone culture is recommended to adapt antibiotic therapy in case of postoperative infectious complications. Measurements of temperature and pressure during RIRS are vital for ensuring patient safety and optimizing surgical outcomes although techniques of measurements and methods for data analysis are still to be refined. Ureteral stents were improved by the development of new biomaterials, new coatings, and new stent designs. Topics of current research are the development of drug eluting and bioresorbable stents.Complications of endoscopic treatment: PCNL is considered the most invasive surgical option. Fever and sepsis were observed in 11 and 0.5% and need for transfusion and embolization for bleeding in 7 and 0.4%. Major complications, as colonic, splenic, liver, gall bladder and bowel injuries are quite rare but are associated with significant morbidity. Ureteroscopy causes less complications, although some of them can be severe. They depend on high pressure in the urinary tract (sepsis or renal bleeding) or application of excessive force to the urinary tract (ureteral avulsion or stricture).Diagnostic work up: Genetic testing consents the diagnosis of monogenetic conditions causing stones. It should be carried out in children and in selected adults. In adults, monogenetic diseases can be diagnosed by systematic genetic testing in no more than 4%, when cystinuria, APRT deficiency, and xanthinuria are excluded. A reliable stone analysis by infrared spectroscopy or X-ray diffraction is mandatory and should be associated to examination of the stone under a stereomicroscope. The analysis of digital images of stones by deep convolutional neural networks in dry laboratory or during endoscopic examination could allow the classification of stones based on their color and texture. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in association with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) is another fundamental research tool for the study of kidney stones. The combination of metagenomic analysis using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques and the enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) protocol can be used to evaluate the urobiome of renal stone formers. Twenty-four hour urine analysis has a place during patient evaluation together with repeated measurements of urinary pH with a digital pH meter. Urinary supersaturation is the most comprehensive physicochemical risk factor employed in urolithiasis research. Urinary macromolecules can act as both promoters or inhibitors of stone formation depending on the chemical composition of urine in which they are operating. At the moment, there are no clinical applications of macromolecules in stone management or prophylaxis. Patients should be evaluated for the association with systemic pathologies.Prophylaxis: Personalized medicine and public health interventions are complementary to prevent stone recurrence. Personalized medicine addresses a small part of stone patients with a high risk of recurrence and systemic complications requiring specific dietary and pharmacological treatment to prevent stone recurrence and complications of associated systemic diseases. The more numerous subjects who form one or a few stones during their entire lifespan should be treated by modifications of diet and lifestyle. Primary prevention by public health interventions is advisable to reduce prevalence of stones in the general population. Renal stone formers at "high-risk" for recurrence need early diagnosis to start specific treatment. Stone analysis allows the identification of most “high-risk” patients forming non-calcium stones: infection stones (struvite), uric acid and urates, cystine and other rare stones (dihydroxyadenine, xanthine). Patients at “high-risk” forming calcium stones require a more difficult diagnosis by clinical and laboratory evaluation. Particularly, patients with cystinuria and primary hyperoxaluria should be actively searched.Future research: Application of Artificial Intelligence are promising for automated identification of ureteral stones on CT imaging, prediction of stone composition and 24-hour urinary risk factors by demographics and clinical parameters,...

1 January 2006 in Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlberto Budia
Alberto Budia
JPJosé Luis Palmero
José Luis Palmero
EBEnric Broseta
Enric Broseta
STSusana Tejadillos
Susana Tejadillos
ABAntonio Benedicto
Antonio Benedicto
JCJ. Fernando Jiménez Cruz
J. Fernando Jiménez Cruz
Objective. To investigate the role of semen cultures versus segmented urine cultures for the diagnosis of bacterial chronic prostatitis. Material and methods. We retrospectively examined 895 patients (age range 17–67 years) who met the consensus criteria for clinical chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, 50.1% of whom had dysuria and/or perineal discomfort, 37.4% infertility of unknown etiology and 12.5% erectile dysfunction. Segmented urine cultures, including expressed prostatic secretions (EPSs) and semen culture, were performed in all patients. Results. Of the 895 patients, 182 had significant positive cultures for Gram-negative microorganisms (Escherichia coli was the commonest specimen isolated: 70.4% of cases) and 283 had significant positive cultures for Gram-positive microorganisms. We compared the culture yield in EPS and/or the urine voided after prostatic massage (VB3) sample (four-glass method) with that of the semen sample. In the Gram-negative group, 32 patients were diagnosed by means of semen culture (negative EPS and/or VB3 sample) and in only five cases was a positive diagnosis made despite a negative semen culture (positive EPS and/or VB3 sample). In the remaining subjects, diagnosis was performed with the aid of both EPS/VB3 sample and semen (both of which were positive). In the Gram-positive group, there was significant growth of such microorganisms in semen in every case considered positive, but in only 46 cases was diagnosis achieved via EPS and/or VB3 sample. A diagnosis of chronic prostatitis by Gram-positive microorganisms in these patients was only considered when the same microorganism was retrieved in repeated cultures without previous treatment. Only three cases met such criteria (all of whom had negative EPSs). To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the semen and EPS samples, we analyzed their sensitivity and specificity, obtaining higher sensitivity in semen than EPS samples for significant Gram-negative cultures: 97% vs 82.4%. In significant Gram-positive cultures, the sensitivity of semen samples was 100%, compared to only 16.1% for EPS. Conclusions. A semen sample has higher sensitivity than an EPS for the diagnosis of bacterial chronic prostatitis. In our clinical work-up, first-void urine and a semen culture are considered the only tests necessary to diagnose chronic prostatitis.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAthanasios Papatsoris
Athanasios Papatsoris
BOGDAN GEAVLETEBOGDAN GEAVLETE
BOGDAN GEAVLETE
DRDaniel George Radavoi
Daniel George Radavoi
MAMohammed Alameedee
Mohammed Alameedee
Murtadha AlmusaferMurtadha Almusafer
Murtadha Almusafer
Alberto TrinchieriAlberto Trinchieri
Alberto Trinchieri
The formation of kidney stones is a complex biologic process involving interactions among genetic, anatomic, dietary, and environmental factors. Traditional lithogenic models were based on urine supersaturation in relation to the activity of crystallization promoters and inhibitors. However, modern research has added new principles such as the “renal epithelial cell response” and the role of inflammation and oxidative stress leading to the development of a “multi-hit hypothesis”. A strong correlation between urinary stones and kidney damage has been well demonstrated by both cohort and case-control studies. The main contributors to chronic kidney damage associated with urinary stones include crystal deposition within the renal parenchyma, associated comorbidities, repeated obstructive and infectious episodes, as well as the potential adverse effects of stone removal procedures. Most hereditary stones may cause high urinary saturation levels promoting obstruction of the Bellini ducts and consequent glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis in the cortex. These include hereditary hypercalciurias, primary hyperoxalurias, cystinuria, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) deficiency (associated with 2,8-dihydroxyadenine lithiasis) and xanthinuria. Complete distal renal tubular acidosis occurs in childhood and presents deafness, rickets, and a short life expectancy. The incomplete form usually manifests in adulthood, primarily with recurrent urinary lithiasis, and less frequently with nephrocalcinosis. In all stone formers stone analysis and a basic metabolic evaluation, including blood biochemistry, urine sediment examination, urinary pH and culture are mandatory, in contrast high-risk stone formers require a more specific metabolic evaluation, including a 24-hour urine sample to measure calcium, phosphate, citrate, oxalate, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and proteinuria. The morpho compositional analysis of kidney stones offers essential insights beyond merely identifying their predominant chemical component. This approach reveals key aspets of the stone formation, such as nucleation sites, crystal growth patterns, and the presence of specific lithogenic processes. The ideal analytical protocol combines stereoscopic microscopy (StM), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and, when necessary, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Recurrence prevention and managing residual fragments require complementary strategies such as lifestyle modifications, dietary interventions, and pharmacological therapies. Among pharmacological options, alkaline citrate salts, particularly potassium citrate, are widely used due to their ability to modify urinary chemistry and inhibit stone formation. Recently, novel molecules have been introduced into the management of renal stone disease. Phytate a naturally occurring polyphosphorylated carbohydrate, exibits a potent inhibitory effect on calcium salt’s nucleation, growth, and aggregation. Theobromine, another natural compound, has been shown to effectively inhibit uric acid crystallization. The co-administration of urinary alkalinizing agents, such as potassium citrate, alongside theobromine has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy to optimize uric acid solubility and to reduce the risk of excessive alkalinization and subsequent sodium urate precipitation. Struvite stones are caused by urinary tract infection with urease- producing microorganisms. Their treatment requires specific measures including complete surgical stone removal, short or long-term antibiotic treatment, to maintain urinary acidification to a pH below 6.2, and a urine volume of at least 2 litres/24 hours. L-methionine has been shown to effectively lower urine pH and the relative supersaturation of struvite. An essential aspect of medical management of urinary stone disease is treatment adherence, which depends on perceived benefit, treatment duration, and side effect profile. The side effects of citrate treatment are mild gastrointestinal disorders whereas thiazide diuretics tend to cause hypokalemia-related symptoms and less frequent metabolic and dermatologic side effects. Urease inhibitors for struvite stones and drugs used to enhance cystine solubility are more frequently associated with side effects. The use of smartphone applications can support patients by promoting adequate hydration, adherence to dietary recommendations, and compliance with prophylactic medication. Endoscopic techniques currently play a prevalent role in the removal of renal stones, while extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is today marginally used for specific indications. Different technical modalities can be used for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), each with its own advantages and disadvntages (standard vs. mini, prone vs. supine, fluoroscopic vs ultrasound-guided). Flexible ureteroscopy or retrograde intrarenal renal surgery (RIRS) has extended its indications due to technological advancements in endoscopes and their accessories. The availability of new laser technologies (thulium fiber laser and pulse-modulated Ho:YAG laser) has enhanced stone fragmentation and dusting capabilities. However, their use exposes the renal parenchyma to high temperatures and pressures which could potentially contribute to renal damage. Factors influencing heat release include laser type and settings, exposure time, stone location, fiber-to-stone distance, irrigation volume and fluid circulation. Reduction of heat release can be achieved by limiting the laser settings to reasonable values or by improving fluid circulation with use of ureteral access sheaths, especially those navigable and equipped with suction. High intrarenal pressure is also closely associated with renal damage. Sustained high pressure or even pressure spikes may increase this risk, highlighting the importance of real-time pressure monitoring through sensors...

13 July 2010 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLSaturnino Lujan
Saturnino Lujan
ABAlberto Budia
Alberto Budia
CCCarlos Di Capua
Carlos Di Capua
EBEnrique Broseta
Enrique Broseta
FCFernando Jiménez Cruz
Fernando Jiménez Cruz

1 August 2015 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FSFederico Soria
Federico Soria
EMEsther Morcillo
Esther Morcillo
ASAlvaro Serrano
Alvaro Serrano
JRJorge Rioja
Jorge Rioja
ABAlberto Budia
Alberto Budia
Francisco Miguel Sánchez MargalloFrancisco Miguel Sánchez Margallo
Francisco Miguel Sánchez Margallo